| Carl2291 said: On the point of post histories being removed - bad On the new mod team - good On the old mod team - lololol |
win.
| Carl2291 said: On the point of post histories being removed - bad On the new mod team - good On the old mod team - lololol |
win.
morenoingrato said:
Could someone on this forum elaborate what was wrong with the old moderators? The forums have started to slowly become worse after the change, and some stuff has just been plain dumb (Max-Seece conflict). People can now get away with many stuff that was deservedly punished when the old team was working, and that is coming from someone that was moderated by most of the old mods |
One word - Maxwell
![]()
Carl2291 said:
One word - Maxwell |
Oh please. At least Maxwell did his job, whether you liked it or not (although it's no surprise you don't) and you wouldn't see the same amount of trolling aand BS when he took care of a thread as you see today. Yeah he was more focused on Nintendo threads, but with good reason.
Quite frankly, threads were more civilized when he was around.
Current PC Build
CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"


lestatdark said:
Oh please. At least Maxwell did his job, whether you liked it or not (although it's no surprise you don't) and you wouldn't see the same amount of trolling aand BS when he took care of a thread as you see today. Yeah he was more focused on Nintendo threads, but with good reason. |
I actually somewhat agree, given I think he was harsh on carl a couple of times, but he was generally good at his job. Carl surprised you didn't say Dunno.

Acevil said:
|
Maxwell had his share of unfair bans, Carl did suffer with him that's true, but he was pro-active and did much more good than bad. Now Dunno was a bad mod, even though he was an overall good member before he went to the modding staff.
Current PC Build
CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"
lestatdark said:
Oh please. At least Maxwell did his job, whether you liked it or not (although it's no surprise you don't) and you wouldn't see the same amount of trolling aand BS when he took care of a thread as you see today. Yeah he was more focused on Nintendo threads, but with good reason. |
Wow, a moderator who banned trolls. That's a surprise. The fact is, his nose was stuck inside a Nintendo shaped butthole and he couldn't handle someone saying something ill of Nintendo. Add in the well known fact he held grudges against several members... Bad mod.
![]()
The problem with banning on intent, is that you can never be 100% sure of the intent in a lot of posts made.
Bias also clouds that decision. Maxwell was the most biased mod we had.
![]()
RolStoppable said:
I have to agree. Maxwell used to ban people based on intent, something that isn't really done anymore. You have instances where everyone knows the motive behind a specific post, but nothing is done about it, because the moderators are bounded by the forum rules like the police is by law. There are people who don't contribute in any positive way to these forums, but they are left to do what they want, because they know about the restrictions that are put on the mods. This may be a little bit ironic coming from me, but I do think that in my time here I have made much more positive contributions than negative ones. |
The thing is, any long time member here in VGC should easily spot those who have actual malicious intent or ulterior motives/hidden agenda behind their posts from those who posts light-hearty stuff and overall fun grabbing threads to lighten the mood (your Rol "troll" threads are a good example of that). Having the ability to distinguish between both, should be a pre-requisite for being able to moderate a forum/site/whatever.
To make myself clear, I'll give the example of Starcraft. He was probably one of the biggest trolls/trouble starters I've seen, yet his actions remained unchecked most of the times because he cleverly stealthed his trolling. Anytime he went further with the trolling, he got banned. If he were still around today, probably he could get away with pretty much anything, and that's the biggest difference from how moderation used to be to what it is now.
Current PC Build
CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"
well i think everything is being said for me. i think the mods are doing an ok job at this point. the situation affects business/flow as usual and thats the problem.
we're going to have these problems hell its a web site. i just hope it gets fix'd soon. even though there are work arounds we shouldn't have to resort to them to keep the flow going smoothly, but hey nothings ever smooth on VGC.
i'm not even sure i'm saying anything?