All sounds like deep rooted psychological problems to me. Doctors these days would probably be able to give a better diagnosis than they did back then.

Or maybe demonic possesion???

Of which there is no evidence. Logically, there's more evidence supporting psychological problems (especially when others exhibit similar symptoms) than for demonic posession.

Simple. We would be in Stone Age again. Why? Because we would soo advanced that we would have developed mass destruction weapons that destroy whole civilizations.

Just like Albert Einstein once said: "I don't know how World War 3 will look like, but I'm sure in World War 4 we are fighting with clubs and stones again."

No religion, ever? Which is to say, no system of beliefs for explaining the way in which the world around us functions, without scientific evidence? Humanity would probably never have evolved. We would have remained simple animals, going about our everyday lives until some natural event or another drove us to extinction. We would have no civilisation without anything to tie us together. Oh, and even if we did survive, no justification to do things which were morally right, anarchy, huge wars, and destruction that way.

No religious institutions? Now, that's a very different thing. No crusades, no dark ages, no Spanish inquisition, so if Family Guy is to be believed, we would be a thousand years in the future, and Meg Griffin would be attractive.

I'm pretty sure those things happened anyway, and religion contributed to them in certain situations, rather than prevent them.

I never said he didn't help  here, all I'm saying is... An insult is still an insult... The situation is equal to a white prider calling a black man a dumb nigger then helping him because of a self degrading quip he makes.

Jesus was prejudice any way you spin it.

is visual evidence the only evidence that satisfies you people? Stop finding excuses and telling yourself" "maybe she had a pscychological problems".Pscychological problems of that kind dont just apper like that out of nowhere. They have roots and reasons. Why is it so hard for you to accept the fact that she was possesed?

There's no maybe about it, she had psychological problems. Again, many roots and reasons can be attributed to her psychological problems, and demonic possession would feature as last on a very long list. Why is it so hard for you to accept demonic possesion is incredibly unlikely? For one thing you have to prove the existence of a "demonic or supernatural" entity, which in itself has never been done.

Why are you so quick to jump to ridiculous assumptions in the face of logic and reason? Surely logic and reason should be looked to before making assumptions and turning to the occult and unknown.

And what do you mean by visual evidence? There was NO evidence in this case, visual or otherwise. I haven't read any detailed reports of a psychological assesment, nothing audio, visual or chemical about the room she stayed in and obviously in that day and age they didn't have the ability to do brain scans.

Lastly, just because you say something is fact doesn't make it so. You need evidence to back up a claim, and nothing you've presented is evidence.

More evidance:

http://www.wackyowl.com/5-notable-examples-demonic-possession-exorcism/

Care to explain how people can change their voices, speak demonic langluages (that are proved to be real by priests), make people levitating vertically and horizontally, kill thier family for no reason, and sometimes, when priest speaks the prayers, the bizzare behavior strangely stops?

Dont worry, Im sure you'll come up with some psycho thing that explains how people can fly...