True.

And it would certainly help if a certain "superpower" would mind to ease a little on the bombings. One would almost believe that this "superpower" intended to cripple Europe and the countries of the refugees.

Ka-pi96 said: I mean, what he's saying isn't wrong, but that still makes him a massive hypocrite considering he fled Tibet as a refugee rather than attempted to "develop" there.

He would instantly get arrested by the Chinese government if he returned to Tibet.

I would never tell a refugee to return. What they fled is horrifying, and even if the Islamic State is completely crushed soon, another terror organization will rise in it's ashes. If you kill one extremist another rises to takes his/her place. One can't rebuild or develop a country or a part of the world overrun with that kind of mentality, and pressuring those to return who have seen their entire lives destroyed based on some principle of developing their homelands seems rather strange to me.

I don't see why Europe should be obligated in accepting "refugees" The west aren't the only developed nations on this planet.

Europe was overrun by that kind of mentality 400 year ago. Now it isn't.

The EU is trying to replicate the USA without English Law (they're doomed to fail).

British Empire (ie British laws/customs) = BAD.

Millions of people moving to Britain to live under British laws/customs = GOOD.

The modern economy has convinced Europeans to reinvent the slave trade. "The immigrants will pay our pensions". This worked well for the USA when there was no welfare state/unlimited benefits. Unfortunately it will lead to Europe's downfall because the idea of small government is anti-thetical to everything a (non-brit) european believes.

Taxation

*expel the jews*

Is the

*pogrom 'em*

Price 

*round 'em up*

We pay for

*genocide 'em

Civilisation

To make my post clearer, all the black/white, islam/noislam, immigration stuff is an identity politics 'cold war' taking place across the West/Internet (culture war). Most of it is due to our fucked up economic system just like Weimar Germany. (my personal opinion is that it's the countryside-city divide on a grand scale).

The EU wants to be a 'good' version of the US but doesn't understand that the US became what it was due to English Law and no/small state. The idea of 'no taxation' is antithetical to every (non-english) european. The EU thinks it can repeat the US but be 'benelovent'. Euros don't understand that it's government that funds genocides and they think money comes from thin air/jewish tricks.

As we all know, the only thing worse than a religious nutjob is an ''ideological continental european''. I could say 'white' but that would put the English and Euros in the same category.

The US constitution is the modern tablets of stone. The US will survive if it sticks to the constitution. Europe has nothing.

Refugees to the Dalai Lama: "Right back at you!"

What you're saying is still very confusing. All I understood was Euro-bashing and that would be completely off topic.