If you were planning to dismiss the example anyway then don't ask for examples.

There is no such thing as "objective" value or 2:1. If someone doesn't consider something important than the value for that person of such thing is 0. It is just as simple as that. And if really there were more value to the market on full HH plus console as you imply Switch would not only sell more than PS4, but they would also be able to charge more for the ports and no one would complain. And since some will complain if a multiplat cost more on Switch than on PS4X1 then you can confirm that the market doesn't see this added value of double you are preaching.

Every single game launched could run better. I'm talking same platform don't try to put other things on the mix that have nothing to do with it. And again you don't have any hard fact showing what priorities made the game look or perform as is, so you are just assuming. And again I haven't said that running at 648p on Switch against 720p WiiU makes Switch weaker (could be, we don't have the data for that). What I said is if one game runs at 480p30fps and another at 720p60fps on Switch if you don't have any other data that can sustain your assumption of it not being more demanding, then by default the way it was coded for the first is more demanding to the system.

Yeah I asked for one game, and you gave me, but point is that game like those are very rear (not if you can find me one game), 99% of games dont offer that, one or few examples dont change hole picture.

There are a lot more cross-buy games that support three playstation platforms (PS4 + PS3 + Vita):

And even more that only support two of them (but nevertheless you get full handheld mode and full home console mode)

So, not $40.

And you will need to buy two different type of hardware to have that option for some games while huge majority of games of course don't offer that in any case, Switch offer full handheld mode and full home console mode for every game out of box.

I think there is a option to reduce memory speed as well to conserve battery life and there is always the pressure on storage for a portable system. Rayman Legends was worse on Switch too due to greater file compression and keeping the games storage requirements low meant loading/decompressing was slower and onscreen artifacts due to compression effects, it was impressively small though.

Prioritising battery life is as stated a reason for performance to go lower.  The extra memory and greater CPU performance of Switch isn't really required here. Having to allow good battery runtime and minimise storage space are technical reasons why a wii u may exceed the performance of Switch in portable mode sometimes surely. All that really matters is the end result. The reason the PS3 often had better soundtracks than 360 and longer and/or higher quality fmv sequences on some games was mainly down to greater storage of a bluray disc nothing more. It still enhanced those games despite having little to do with the main chipset performance of those consoles. The wii u had cheap storage with a single layer bluray disc providing 25GB of capacity and no difference in cost to manufacture a 500MB game on its optical disc or a 25GB game because the disc has a fixed capacity that you can use up to. I don't think you can just cancel out battery runtime and limited storage when it comes to Switch games and expect to be seen as fair. 

Saying that its difficult to get too worked up about either wii u or Switch as it looks so amazing emulated. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGdA686roRo

You can also run the emulator with 3D patches for Zelda for example to give VR reality or support for 3D tv's. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNREdbwizks

So its horrible to say it but often the Nintendo gaming experience can be better on non-Nintendo hardware anyway. It's why for me these Switch ports of wii u games without new content are not very interesting as a wii u owner who already owns these games and it still seems nothing really has been achieved of any significance porting the game from wii u to Switch except to play an old game at the same performance level overall. A little less resolution in portable mode, a little more docked.

Sure there are ton that doesn`t defend and also part of those are vocal against it. Still I didn`t see you attacking the ones defending and talking about agenda. And seems like you also didn`t read the other posts on the thread where I explain that this notion came from several threads in defense of pratices like this.

Tabletop mode count too? It's a big plus for me to play with friends on the go. DK would be a nice addition but it's too pricey for me.

There are a lot more cross-buy games that support three playstation platforms (PS4 + PS3 + Vita):

And even more that only support two of them (but nevertheless you get full handheld mode and full home console mode)

Yeah as a Wii U owner myself these rehashed ports offer nothing of value to me either.

Just saying, in the grand scheme of things, games like this and Rayman are the outliers when the majority of games run better on a portable Switch than on Wii U. And those outliers seem to be down to developer choice; very likely the games could've been on par or better if not for Ubisoft going nuts with unnecessary compression or DKC apparently going for maximum battery life over visual fidelity.

I have no patience for "attacking" the kind of people who'd defend a 4 year old game selling for $60 USD, that's basically banging my head against a brick wall. If some people are that willing to let a multi-billion dollar corporation rip them off, there's not much I can do about that. But if you go into threads and articles about this even on Nintendo fan sites and you'll see tons of people rightly condemning this anti-consumer pricing.

Not $60 and its the only one above $40. Your point.

It doesn't count because of arbitrary rules... and notebooks aren't portable and stationary as well... and PSP being able to hook up to the TV without another console also doesn't count... only Nintendo endeavors count.

Someone that ask for 1 example and ignore it even so, wouldn't accept 100 as well... and you saw that he just did it.