Miyamotoo said:
Notebooks are part of PC platforms and PC platforms is very difrent than consoles platform from plenty of reasons. No, PSP didnt could hook up to TV out of box, and again you didnt had full home console experience like Switch offers, reality is that nobady almost relly cared about fact that PSP could be connect to TV, while one of main reason why Switch is selling so great is fact that Switch are buying handheld and home consoles users. But of course you again fail to see totally obvious things, so I relly dont understand whats your point with this, what exatly you trying to proof here!? No I didnt ignore your 1 example, it wasnt point about one example, or more more them, but about fact that huge majority of games on console market dont offer cross-buy, they are exceptions. |
https://www.lifewire.com/psp-games-on-your-tv-2792615
To hook your PSP to the TV you only needed a cable, is that your "not able to hook up to TV out of box"? And you see, you yourself is defining value as something subjective. PSP could do it, you and several didn't care about it, so didn't saw value in it. So your point of Switch games having more objective value falls flat.
Yes you dismissed them as soon as they were presented after you asked.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."