I said if its not badly implemented, Blightown was a case of bad implementation, it had dips bellow 15 FPS, if Blightown was stbale 30 FPS it wouldnt have been a problem at all.

Devs keep shitting in the bed, stfu already, 30fps is NOT better than 60fps, but is not a deal breaker either.

http://whatculture.com/film/8-actresses-who-tricked-you-into-thinking-you-saw-them-nude.php/2

Lol I hate when I'm right.

Nintendo runs their games at 720p because the hardware just isn't up to snuff. The PS4/XBONE struggle with 1080p gaming (more the latter.) If Nintendo had the hardware I'm sure their games would be at a minimum 900p at 60fps (not all games, but many.) 

Yeah, all the while playing Bayonetta 2 I was thinking "This framerate hold back the action"...............

It is actually funny how one's perception of frame-rate can change when one actually experiences 60 fps in their game. I was playing skyrim on my laptop at about 28fps (constant - locked) with no ENB but on high settings 1080p. It was an alright experience. I just built a new PC and with enb/maxed settings/many more graphics mods I can run the game at >60fps (I just lock it to 60fps though.) It was like night and day. Then I tried adding more details to the ENB like SSAO, lighting effects, etc, etc and my frame-rate dropped to 50 fps. Then I wanted to get rid of jaggies so I super-sampled my resolution from 1440p and my frame-rate is about 35 fps, but I lock it at 30fps to eliminate tearing with v-sync. Even though it looks a lot better super-sampled, I just can't get over the frame-rate drop (even though it is a constant 30fps, actions feel blocky and slow.) So for days now I've been looking for a nice AA method (hardware MSAA doesn't work with ENB) to alleviate the aliasing problems I have without using super-sampling, but also keep my 60 fps. A month ago I was playing skyrim with lesser graphics at 30 fps and was content lol. I just know my PC can get it just how I want it, and that is why I am trying more, I guess. The same feeling is present when certain games run at only 30fps on the PS4, a console many espouse as equivalent to mid-ranged gaming PCs.

There is no reason, in my opinion, why the original Dark Souls for the PC ran at 720p 30fps, regardless of your rig, other than laziness or incompetence and that is something that I just chalked up to being a lazy port, but the problem seems to be more integral to the company. I say this despite Bloodborne being my most anticipated PS4 game, and the one that might just make me buy the system. Hopefully the game at least runs at a constant 30 fps.

You jest with us, Pullu. When are you ever wrong. You hater of yourself and everything else. Roflmao. 

I find 3rd person / open world games are better in 30fps so I fail to see how this is a problem.

30 fps is NEVER better than 60 fps. Anyone arguing otherwise is an idiot. This of course assuming all other factors of the game are identical.

Obviously in this case the developer of bloodbourne thought that visuals were more important than fluidity of the gameplay. From what little i've seen of the game that seems fine. Seems like a very slow paced game, so hardly need fluidity.

Why do devs even comment on the framerate and resolution outside of stating what they are?