1. No force. UBI. Here's enough money to do with whatever you please, so you can't argue that you don't have enough money, since you and the baby will both be given the basics financially. If you have another reason as to why you want to abort then you're free to voice that.

2. You wanted to know what a more humane choice would be because you asked if terminating the fetus was worse than having a baby/child where it cannot be properly cared for. Well what would be worse, allowing astronauts to potentially end up in a situation without heat or oxygen, or not sending them into space so that doesn't happen? Basically, ending all future potential careers of astronauts, like ending all future potential of fetus'. To boldly go where no aborted fetus has gone before?  

"You know the greatest danger facing us is ourselves, an irrational fear of the unknown. But there's no such thing as the unknown — only things temporarily hidden, temporarily not understood."

"Without freedom of choice there is no creativity. The body dies."

"Live long and prosper."

3. You wanted to know how trying to ensure the well being of the mother and child is inconsistent. If both she and the baby get UBI, then money should not be a problem since it will allow them the basic necessities.

If they came together to create another, I don't know how that would imply anything else other than they decided to procreate. If this isn't the case, then you could simply say we don't know the reasons why the husband and wife got married either. Maybe he pretended to be something he's not and that's why she keeps getting crazier and drives him nuts, because she wants revenge for all we know. Maybe this, maybe that. If that's not what both parties agreed to then what good was the contract now that she's dead?

Even if two people come together and act in a manner that could potentially create a fetus, that shouldn't necessarily let them off the hook. If you learn to drive, pass your test, get your license, and then crash into another vehicle because you had an accident, the outcome isn't simply, 'sorry other driver, you should have known an accident could occur and a write off was a possibility, too bad so sad.' No, you're forced to have insurance to cover the costs of whatever damage you caused in the act and you pay for that, however much it is and however much it sucks. Heck if you get in enough accidents, you'll lose your license to operate any road legal vehicle for some period of time. Yet we allow people to 'come together' and be reckless or have accident after accident, and instead of using the 'insurance' to solve the problem, we just allow them to 'write it off' no matter the damage. No one loses their 'license to drive on the roads'. Mad Max rules?

So to say what she feels is irrelevant....? Equality? If people's feelings don't matter well then...

'Adults' are also incapable of making comprehensive decisions at times. Some more so than others. Some more often than others. At what age or classification is the point in time when all your decisions are always all knowing perfection?

Earth and it's biosphere are biological. Without mother Earth's womb she dies. In good faith, in terms of people themselves, how long does she have to live to be able to truly say she can survive entirely on her own? An hour? A week? A year? Just longer than a fetus could?

It's voluntary manslaughter, not murder.

So if you 'know' a law is wrong, you will follow it anyway, meaning you yourself are aware that you're doing something wrong, but that's ok because it's the 'laws fault', yet if someone snaps and beats someone else to death, feeling justified since they've been pushed to the suicidal edge by them, and that's against the law, they should be held accountable because you 'know' those laws are right?

Well if the fetus doesn't have full autonomous control over the mother's body so it doesn't get to dictate the terms, as you pointed out earlier, then if the wife doesn't have full autonomous control over the husband, she doesn't get to dictate the terms either, correct?

If you used your own 'IP' and 'product' to help create that fetus, how can you have no rights to it? Who decides if the mothers decision is an adult decision, and who's to say the fathers adult decision isn't 'more comprehensively adult' than her's?

If a law was passed that said nobody can procreate anymore, and the reason given was because it's possible that someday, that being could grow up and become a truck driver and may aimlessly run into a woman and her newborn baby, would you agree that law would be justified?

I had a GF for 3 years that was a paramedic. She told me quite a few stories about her encounters, on which a few occasion's she had people begging her to end their life, in which case she told me she wouldn't ever do that to someone because she felt it was wrong, no matter the pain. Her go to line if I ever showed too much weakness was "toughen up buttercup", typically said in a lighthearted, "I'm not entirely joking though" kind of tone.

Odds are pretty high they wouldn't attempt it unless necessary. They would of course have to do much planning, and what they would have to build up and send would be more Navy and Air Force focused, initially at least. This would be necessary as you say, because boots on the ground would be much tougher. There are also the allies that would come to the aid of Aus, but if it was America that was attacking, that would make choosing sides considerably more complicated. While short term may be doable, if you're up against the mightiest, long term is not something I would gamble on in the outback. (My paramedic GF's extended family all lived throughout Aus and she'd been there and seen much, more than a few times, before she met me.)

It's still here and stronger than it was during the cold war era. China is becoming a threat which is why the trade war is happening. America has gotten too soft and has let China run wild, at America's own overall expense.

He does have a choice, which is why he hasn't and isn't backing down and is pushing even harder. Rome wasn't built in a day.

One day another country will be on top, and China's growth will continue regardless, but depending on what happens with the American tariffs, it will either increase or decrease, more than potentially expected, depending on the outcome and any ripple effect.

I'd prefer Canada to be a little more like America. Somewhere near the middle of where we both stand now. Less socialism would be better.

Some Canadians try to take credit for it, and from time to time try to use it against the Americans to little avail. They know who the red coats really were.

It is still the strongest military by far in spite of fluctuations. China's military is improving but has a long way to go. 

Wages can only be kept so low for so long. Good that your relationship is friendly and mutual.

I don't see those historical ties changing anytime soon either. Unless of course China wins bigly and you side with them going forward. lol

We try and do the same but America is next door and while that's a good thing most of the time, it can be detrimental at times.

1&3.  No. Welfare is one thing, but enough for the basics so you don't have to work is way too much, especially at the expense of who has to fund it. I'm for people taking responsibility and owning it. I know I said one or the other before, but that was in reference to whoever wants to push for both. Offering both contradicts each other and it makes them look bad.

2.  You just forgot to mention that astronauts were at one point in time fetus' themselves.

Allowed or not, always murder.

I thank Odin every year for murdering my only child through miscarriage.  If not then Id have been stuck with bitch ex from college.

Actually, with the Trump-appointed judges the states that make these laws might see a chance that it goes to the supreme court and leads to overturning Roe vs. Wade. That might be the reason for the extreme laws put up, so that they are more likely to be challenged in court.

That's exactly what their gameplay is and they even stated it.  Alabama can go fuck itself with it not even excluding rape or incest after short 8 weeks which most women probably don't even know they are pregnant by then.  Alabama went so far that most GOP congress reps are like whoa that's too far.

I can never understand the far left and right extremist views of the US.

Why not compromise like the rest of the world, allow for abortion under certain extreme circumstances, and only within a certain period.

Never mind philosophical or political ideologies, just seems like the common sense thing to do given everything this issue involves.

"like rest of the world" is a very broad statement as abortion laws differ a lot between different parts of the world:

https://www.pewresearch.org/interactives/global-abortion/

http://www.worldabortionlaws.com/map/

The far majority of western nations have relatively liberal abortion laws and while the period during which you can legally have an abortion differs between the countries most do not require any special circumstances as far as I've understood.

That's a dreadful joke, really.

I hope nobody have cursed Odin for you being actually born.