By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - VGChartz Standard and Premium Memberships

 

What if VgChartz starts charging a monthly fee to view sales numbers?

I won't pay. 334 75.57%
 
I'll pay. 23 5.20%
 
I'll go to BugriChartz instead. 85 19.23%
 
Total:442
Snake612 said:
If that happens, I will finally have a good excuse to leave this site forever.

I changed my mind. Charge for the data.

Kidding

But some more clarification from ioi would be nice. I think the only reason he hasn't provided it is because it's not set in stone yet.

I like loadestatement's suggestion.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Around the Network
darthdevidem01 said:

I know, I used to always think how this site was financially viable for ioi. I for one am happy he is going for this.

VGChartz is still the definitive sales site for us though, as we will STILL get weekly hardware sales & weekly software sales (albeit just the top 50)

but did any of you ever go past the top 50 page anyway? (I really didn't, except for when MGS4 released & I wanted to see where it ranked for months on)

We will still have excellent forums!

And if the subscription based system can make this site more popular & reputable, it will only be better for everyone imo.

I love going through the top 200 and seeing which titles made it. Lemme tell ya, #150-200 contains some fierce competition of titles trying to stay alive.

But like I said (and what you're saying), still having the top 50 overall and top 10 for each console is plenty for the average forum goer/lurker. But still... the option that LoadedStatement made is a beautiful thing...



Kantor said:
Snake612 said:
If that happens, I will finally have a good excuse to leave this site forever.

I changed my mind. Charge for the data.

Kidding

But some more clarification from ioi would be nice. I think the only reason he hasn't provided it is because it's not set in stone yet.

I like loadestatement's suggestion.

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@smeags

thanks for agreeing to agree with me!

Us dog people need to stick together !!!



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Will VGC 3.0 feature PC games sales data?



ioi said:

Well since this thread has been created, it makes sense to fill you in on some of the plans.

For VGC 3.0 we are planning 3 levels of access for data:

  • Free where you can see top 20 charts each week (top 50 rankings), top 10 per console (top 30 rankings), hardware, top 10 preorders (top 30 rankings), new features like milesones, weekly records. Will be enough to have an overview and to discuss trends.
  • Standard membership (~$99 per year) where you can see top 200 per week, top 50 per console, top 50 per publisher, top 100 preorders, extra comparison tools, maybe top level download charts, maybe no ads.
  • Premium membership (for industry) where you can see all data as well as some fancy tools for analysing revenues, year on year data, anticipation metrics plus much more.

So you won't HAVE to pay to view data but if you do subscribe it gives you access to more data. Unfortunately, the data-collection side to VGChartz has got to a point now where it is costing more to run than it is generating in ad revenue, therefore we need to move to a new costing model to continue to grow and improve the service. The data certainly won't be going anywhere but you'll only be able to see top-level data for free with the new site. It's more a case of adding new stuff and charging to use it than charging for what is already there.

Does the VG Chartz staff have to pay?



Around the Network

I might still come to the site for news/forum that I have heavily invested in. I have also donated in the past, however, I won't pay for the sales data.

I will donate again, if the donate button was easier to access. I also have used the store to buy from amazon.

I think just better front page support of these features would drive better additional money to the site.



ioi said:

Well I though my original post was fairly clear but just to address a couple of points.

  • We will have the option to run standard membership for just a month if people want to just try it out or find a yearly subscription too cost-prohibitive
  • The cost of a standard membership isn't set in stone yet - $99 is there as a rough idea and I'm keen for feedback. Maybe $70 or $50 would seem more appropriate ($6 or $4 per month really isn't a lot)
  • The cost of premium membership is in the many hundreds of dollars per year and is aimed at industry clients
  • Standard membership will be everything you have now, plus new features such as weekly records, milestones, pre-order charts, more advanced comparison tools
  • Free membership will be limited to only top-level data each week, with rankings for games below that. The actual cut-offs we use have not been decided yet, but will be along the lines of what I said in the original post.
  • On game pages, you will still be able to see the first ten weeks of sales (free membership) or all weeks of sales (standard / pro membership) along with LTDs for all. So you can still see, even with a free membership, how many copies have been sold in total.

It's no different really, to only being able to see the top 200 games now in a given week and the top 50 per console or platform (we track 5000 skus per week). Any data for games outside of those filters is still there and will still show up in LTDs and on game comparison charts etc but you can't easily get to them in the weekly charts.

By paying for a standard membership (or ultimately a premium membership) you make the data more accessible and also add lots of new features that are not available at the moment. I see it as a forward step, not backward.

I'll be happy wit that!

so if its between $70 - $99

are we talking like £40 - £50 a year?



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

ioi said:
  • On game pages, you will still be able to see the first ten weeks of sales (free membership) or all weeks of sales (standard / pro membership) along with LTDs for all. So you can still see, even with a free membership, how many copies have been sold in total.

That's pretty huge if you ask me. I've always wanted to see how the title did after week 10... and now Standard users will be able to do just that. Hot dang... that's pretty cool.



ioi said:
And yes, the plan is to start showing PC data in the future - this is something we already have the capability to do.

If this comes true, you'll definitely get my money (I would have most probably paid for a standard membership anyway, but PC sales data would be the icing on the cake for me).



ioi said:

Well since this thread has been created, it makes sense to fill you in on some of the plans.

For VGC 3.0 we are planning 3 levels of access for data:

  • Free where you can see top 20 charts each week (top 50 rankings), top 10 per console (top 30 rankings), hardware, top 10 preorders (top 30 rankings), new features like milesones, weekly records. Will be enough to have an overview and to discuss trends.
  • Standard membership (~$99 per year) where you can see top 200 per week, top 50 per console, top 50 per publisher, top 100 preorders, extra comparison tools, maybe top level download charts, maybe no ads.
  • Premium membership (for industry) where you can see all data as well as some fancy tools for analysing revenues, year on year data, anticipation metrics plus much more.

So you won't HAVE to pay to view data but if you do subscribe it gives you access to more data. Unfortunately, the data-collection side to VGChartz has got to a point now where it is costing more to run than it is generating in ad revenue, therefore we need to move to a new costing model to continue to grow and improve the service. The data certainly won't be going anywhere but you'll only be able to see top-level data for free with the new site. It's more a case of adding new stuff and charging to use it than charging for what is already there.

I knew this day would come and I don't like it one bit.

First I'd like to say that I understand that you plan on charging 'advanced' data for the industry, it take a lot of work to make all that. But that standard membership? I understand that you're not getting enough revenue, but the premium membership will cover (a part of?) it. Besides, if the ads aren't bringing in enough money, than you should try and get more members.

VGChartz has something unique no other site has next to the (p)review and news you see everywhere:  accurate sales data. Yet, this community is very small compared to gamespot, ign, neogaf, gamefaqs, ... by having the industry pay you for data, I think you've proven to everyone that the data is accurate.

And you say you're not going to charge for data we already have? I check the top 200 of worldwide sales every week, top 50 of most platforms and some publishers.
And I'm sure that over time, you'll start to 'persuade' us to pay for the data (delaying the data for free users, removing certain data, ...)

Like Mummelman said: this site grew big (and continues to grow) because it's free. Don't change that.