Yeah, I've seen that pic in one of my old Nintendo Powers, mailing label said Oct 7, which sounds about right. Here's a pic from the article it was in. Fair Warning, fairly huge picture.
http://img371.imageshack.us/img371/4278/nintendopowerox5.jpg
Yeah, I've seen that pic in one of my old Nintendo Powers, mailing label said Oct 7, which sounds about right. Here's a pic from the article it was in. Fair Warning, fairly huge picture.
http://img371.imageshack.us/img371/4278/nintendopowerox5.jpg
what's up with this onslaught of new members posting on outdated threads?
It was basically one guy, who got banned and then clearly came back for some more. I think it's over now...except for the fact that now regulars are posting on these threads again...which I suppose isn't necessarily bad...just annoying...
LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release. (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )
(at the risk of being on of those "regulars [who] are posting on these threads again...which I suppose isn't necessarily bad...just annoying...")
But... what is his motive? Is there anything to be gained from this at all from his part?
being a nuisance perhaps?
He got banned for it, and then came back again with a different username to do the exact same thing.
I PM'd him about it, telling him that bumping old threads was quite annoying, and that he wasn't even contributing to those old threads. I told him to stop, he never responded, but instead he kept bumping. I banned him, he came back with a different username, bumping even more topics than before. If that's not being a nuisance I don't know what is.
In the least he could have at least messaged me back and apologized or explained himself. But no.
LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release. (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )
your mother said: May the force be with you on this one, Obi-wan. Reminds me of when a buddy got his first PC, about 4-5 years ago. He wanted games, so I ftp'd him some (back then) state-of-the-art games (HL, Undying, etc). He thought the graphics were the shiznit. Then I told him to download one more game I uploaded, a 6mb file. He said, "You're joking, right? Can a 6mb game be any good?" Six months later, he was STILL raving about the game - discussing strategies and tactics with me almost daily. Graphics sucked elephant 'nads - try VGA 320x200. No voice-overs. Even the MIDI sounds were craptastic, even back then. However, the gameplay rocked him so hard he didn't even play any "graphics-whore" games until he passed this 6mb game three times. This game is being revamped by indie developers/fans even today, to try to bring the graphics to today's standards while keeping the gameplay intact. I believe you can download it for free. The game? It's called X-Com. Man, some of the best games ever (for me at least) are turn-based strategy games. I don't care how you dress one of these games up, but if you've ever played X-Com, or Civilization for that matter, you can see while graphics do make the game look nice, the gameplay is what makes these games seriously rock. You want fancy-schmancy immersive graphics that cross the uncanny valley and look hot-shit? Rent a movie. LOTR is highly recommended. Otherwise, gameplay will, at least for me, ALWAYS come first. |
Oh, X-Com was great. As I played I first, I remember I was wondering, why it became so light in the outside: I played through the whole night, without noticing.