By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - [Variety] Disney's Boy Trouble: Corp seeking ways to win back young men

mZuzek said:
chakkra said:

1) Star Wars has ALWAYS had female characters. Leia was an important part of the first trilogy, Padme was an important part of the second trilogy. Ahsoka was an important part of the Clone Wars series. And there were many secondary female characters sprinkled in there: Mon Mothma, Shakti, Assaj Ventress, The Night Sisters, etc.

Dude. "Having" female characters doesn't make a story interesting for women. Look at the first female characters that come to your mind when you think of Star Wars. Leia and Padme. Two extremely shallow characters whose arcs are always somewhere in between damsel in distress and trophy wife. They're both there just to serve as plot devices for the male heroes. No woman in the world looks up to those characters and goes like "she's awesome, I wanna be like her".

Yeah, Disney took things in the extreme other direction with Rey, by trying so hard to make her look cool that they forgot to write an actual arc for her, so she just spends 3 movies getting everything handed to her for free and never making a mistake. Maybe young girls can look at her and say "she's awesome, I wanna be like her", but anyone who likes good character work and storytelling will only see a boring shallow character.

Ultimately the best female characters in the series, both before and after Disney's takeover, came in spin-offs. Haven't seen Clone Wars stuff but yeah, Ahsoka seems pretty cool. And Jyn was awesome in Rogue One (the one actually good Star Wars film Disney put out).

But the female characters are the female fantasy. Problem with Leia and Padme is that they're side characters. Rey on the other hand is Elsa in Star Wars universe. People like Leia and Padme because they're believable.

Whether you like damsell in distress or not, female fantasy is that someone who they love will save them just like male fantasy is to be the hero.



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

Around the Network

I don't think anybody is against inclusion when it fits the storyline. People are against forced inclusion where the story is force fit around politics.

Nobody was upset over Samus or Aloy.



i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED

the-pi-guy said:
chakkra said:

Okay, here's the thing, stories targeted to the female demographic (books, TV series, movies, etc) have always been told from a female perspective. Why? because most women relate more to a character from their perspective. There's nothing wrong with that, that is basic nature, everybody understands that. That's why you have never seen men complaining, calling women sexist for watching stories from their perspective, and demanding to have more "representation" in female-targeted stories.

But somehow we got to a point in time where a group of people in charge looked at the things that men were watching and said "Wait a minute! why do men prefer stories told from their perspective? That's wrong!".

The problem is not preference. There's nothing wrong with preferring stories told from male perspectives, as a male.  

Acting like it is offensive, when more stories are told from female perspectives is when it starts to be a problem.

When you act like Star Wars is "supposed" to be targeted towards men, that's a problem. 

You can complain that Star Wars doesn't make enough content that is geared towards you, but that isn't the same thing as "Star Wars is *supposed* to be targeted at men. 

There is a difference between having a preference and insisting that something has to be a certain way and getting morally outraged because the universe won't pander to you specifically.  

The thing is its stupid though.
85%+ of their audience for these IPs were males.

This is like Mattel that make Barbie dolls, suddenly going on whatever the reverse of a feminist trip would be... Imagine a man takes over Mattel, and he hates women.... so he says, we won't make Barbie dolls that are Female in form.

Kids will just have to learn to play with male barbie dolls.... from now on, its just Ken. It's "kenough". 
Don't like it? You sexist monster! teach your kid to play with male dolls!

Then if anyone says anything about it on the internet, you get replies from defenders that go "I don't understand why people are offended!"


 
"When you act like Star Wars is "supposed" to be targeted towards men, that's a problem. "

Gender rolls are real.
If I told you a story was about Mid-evil Knights, that have swords of light, that run around decapitating one another.... in space, on big space ships.
Its a story about good vs evil, honor and doing the right thing. 

You don't automatically think "Wow the women love stories like that, I bet it will be a big hit with the ladies!".

Lets not be stupid about this.
Yes Starwars is 100% ment to be for the guys.
That is okay.

There are plenty of things that target women, that guys don't enjoy.
Why is it bad that guys have their own thing?



mZuzek said:
chakkra said:

1) Star Wars has ALWAYS had female characters. Leia was an important part of the first trilogy, Padme was an important part of the second trilogy. Ahsoka was an important part of the Clone Wars series. And there were many secondary female characters sprinkled in there: Mon Mothma, Shakti, Assaj Ventress, The Night Sisters, etc.

Dude. "Having" female characters doesn't make a story interesting for women. Look at the first female characters that come to your mind when you think of Star Wars. Leia and Padme. Two extremely shallow characters whose arcs are always somewhere in between damsel in distress and trophy wife. They're both there just to serve as plot devices for the male heroes. No woman in the world looks up to those characters and goes like "she's awesome, I wanna be like her".

Yeah, Disney took things in the extreme other direction with Rey, by trying so hard to make her look cool that they forgot to write an actual arc for her, so she just spends 3 movies getting everything handed to her for free and never making a mistake. Maybe young girls can look at her and say "she's awesome, I wanna be like her", but anyone who likes good character work and storytelling will only see a boring shallow character.

Ultimately the best female characters in the series, both before and after Disney's takeover, came in spin-offs. Haven't seen Clone Wars stuff but yeah, Ahsoka seems pretty cool. And Jyn was awesome in Rogue One (the one actually good Star Wars film Disney put out).

Women don't need to be the ones fighting to be worthy of looking up too.
I think your downplaying Leia and Padme's roll in the story and the impact they have.

Rey is a feminist power trip gone wrong, and should not be a roll model imo.

Also "No woman in the world looks up to those characters and goes like "she's awesome, I wanna be like her".

Have you never seen cosplay?
Also plenty of women actually like the idea of the damsel in distress and a strong man showing up to save them from their troubles.
There's tons of love stories that sell very well to women, based on that concept.

Again a topic is about Guys feeling that they have had their thing trashed by Disney.
Reguardless of how much defense force, allies here run for them everytime a topic is about this stuff.....
the end results in the real world, are less guys watching this crap, and less money made by Disney.

I feel like certain people are off tracking the topic here, trying to play defense.



JRPGfan said:


Lets not be stupid about this.
Yes Starwars is 100% ment to be for the guys.
That is okay.

There are plenty of things that target women, that guys don't enjoy.
Why is it bad that guys have their own thing?

You clearly did not understand what I am saying.

There is a difference between the concern being that you don't have enough content for you, and when you have to go out of your way to exclude other people.  

I'm not sure how many ways I can say that.

JRPGfan said:

 he hates women.... 

And again, this is what I'm talking about. 

You guys for some bizarre reason want to go out of your way to being stepped on.  

A bad sequel is probably just a bad sequel, but instead you guys want to imagine a universe where the film makers got together to collectively hate you.  

Execs frequently want to expand their userbase, and a lot of times that means appealing to people that they currently don't. That doesn't mean that they despise the old fanbase - and it certainly can happen that they make a misstep and end up losing both their user base and the people they're trying to expand appeal to. 

But that's not the same thing as hating their user base. 

JRPGfan said:

"When you act like Star Wars is "supposed" to be targeted towards men, that's a problem. "

Gender rolls are real.
If I told you a story was about Mid-evil Knights, that have swords of light, that run around decapitating one another.... in space, on big space ships.
Its a story about good vs evil, honor and doing the right thing. 

You don't automatically think "Wow the women love stories like that, I bet it will be a big hit with the ladies!".

Yeah, because women didn't watch Game of Thrones, and they don't watch Star Wars. 

 

Gender roles are largely a cultural invention, that shifts. Plenty of female dominated things used to be male dominated things, and vice versa.

There are several surveys that show that the fanbase of Star Wars is about 60/40.  40% are women.

https://www.jeditemplearchives.com/2024-06-12-the-demographics-of-star-wars-fans/



Around the Network
the-pi-guy said:
coolbeans said:

Both in your response and some of the other posts since my first comment, it's genuinely baffling how some people are approaching this situation.  You understand the type of specialized fandom Star Wars has cultivated since its OG release, right?

It's baffling to me why men feel like they're under attack, when someone is just trying to include more people. 

"Remember: Star Wars is primarily for 12-year-old boys." - as far as I can tell this part is the actual quote that was said by George Lucas, and you're arguing that Star Wars was for everyone. 

But suggesting that the Force is Female (in a different context), is dismissive for men.  

That's how it generally feels when these kinds of comments come up. If you specify women, it must be pushing away men. If you specify men, it gets argued it is for everyone.  

I mean... I guess part of our disagreement stems from reading the room differently.  This kind of overinflated proportionality to these complaints just doesn't ring as genuine - aside from the most radical of responses.  Most people rebuking Disney Wars aren't mentally framing this as a mini-9/11 or whatever, but rather directly responding the elephant in the room.  To see why Disney's lost their influence with this particular market just look at the slop they've recently made.

Not quite.  Let me clarify: that GL quote is really a fusion of sentiments he's shared before.  I was using some creative license to reflect how I interpret his quotes: the broader mythical tale is consumable for all ages, but his biggest focus was the pre-teen boy audience.  This is reflected by both word and deed.  I vaguely recall a story about GL interviewing child psychologists to see how they'd handle the darker tone in Empire Strikes Back, for example.

I think you're missing the point.  I'm less concerned about it being "dismissive of men" and more about showcasing a peculiar contrast.  It's like the perfect representation of Disney's fundamental disregard for GL's creative drive & ethos; even his fictional cosmic energy field can't avoid being roped into a silly gender tagline.  To be clear: labeling The Force as either male or female is stupid and reductive.   



November 2025 Articles:

Battlefield 6 (XS) Review -- 6.5/10 |

Disney should buy the rights to 50 Shades of Grey and continue the franchise in their image...



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.

bdbdbd said:

female fantasy is that someone who they love will save them just like male fantasy is to be the hero.

That's just centuries of misogyny being fed straight into your brain.



mZuzek said:
bdbdbd said:

female fantasy is that someone who they love will save them just like male fantasy is to be the hero.

That's just centuries of misogyny being fed straight into your brain.

That's just human nature. When you let men and women or boys and girls choose their roles, that's what they choose.

I didn't quite understand how what I said have anything to do with misogyny? I even pointed out the behaviour or both sexes, not just women.



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

bdbdbd said:
mZuzek said:

That's just centuries of misogyny being fed straight into your brain.

That's just human nature. When you let men and women or boys and girls choose their roles, that's what they choose.

I didn't quite understand how what I said have anything to do with misogyny? I even pointed out the behaviour or both sexes, not just women.

I think it's misogyny because the two roles aren't equal. And my basis for thinking that the two roles aren't equal is that women seem to have happily taken over some of these more masculine roles while men rarely are willing to take over in the other direction. It seems pretty common to me that men that laud the roles that women once took as standard (like staying in the home and taking care of the kids) say that those are really important and great roles, but never appear to want to do them. 

Describing both roles doesn't necessitate a lack of misogyny if one roll is superior to the other. 



...