Yeah, my knee jerk reaction to it all, then followed by cautious optism was truly nothing in comparison to the takes I'm reading from back then ...
"don't want Nintendo to fail as a company but Switch isn't what the masses wanted and it isn't what big developers wanted either... Nintendo lightening up on who gets dev units isn't a bad thing but it doesn't mean only good things are coming either. "
Then you had @Veknoid_Outcast litteraly predicting the exact strategy that would make the Switch the actual success it is :
" But I think Nintendo can carve out a corner of the industry for itself. It doesn't need to offer 4K resolution, eight cores, or six teraflops. It just needs an attractive price point and a steady supply of Nintendo games, with a few interesting third-party games filling in the gaps. Nintendo doesn't need to sell 80 million units. It just needs to turn a consistent profit. "
Fantastic re-read. Actually aside from the few debates that were had with a certain person a few months ago due to supposed specs, DLSS and Red Dead Redemption (lol), we didn't really get much of these kind of speculation threads during the Switch sucessor speculation era.
Don't know if I miss in part but it sure made the forum more lively lol