The problem is who holds the power to decide what can and cannot be said. Because whomever holds that power has a ton of influence and control. Just not a good idea.

Threats are already illegal. Nothing needs to change there. Jokes about marginalized groups are not intrinsically threats unless it's suggestive of an actual threatening action. So I'm just kind of confused as to what you're suggesting. 

Everybody knows ISIS started as a comedy improv. Inflation would be lower if comedians finally got to it the right way. And people are killed every day in Israel, Ukraine, Syria, Afghanistan etc. by insensitive jokes. Why can't stand-ups stop cutting wood unsustainably? And finaly: the basis of good mental health for any well adjusted person is a comedians take on them. So we should really hold them to a higher standard.

I think I should be the one deciding on what hate speech is. -Then our world would be a much better place.

Well, a comedian can try to get away with his threatning speech by saying "it was just a joke", but that was just one example. I have been saying is that the boundary must be the law, so you can include anything that attempt to break a law desguised as a joke. 

I think this just goes without saying though. I don't think anyone here is saying that comedians are above the law. 

1. Moral, of course.

2. The comedian.

3. It depends on how historical do you mean.  5 years ago or 500 years ago?  It also helps if you parse your joke in that history. 

1. Data and statistics can delineate the shitters from the shittees.  Socioeconomic factors of groups, crimes against groups, limitation of representation in society/government, etc... If you understand the difference between individual and group circumstances, It's not difficult to recognize how jokes can add insult to injury and should be refrained. Kicking those that are already down is the low hanging fruit of stand up.

2. See above about who implements the boundaries.

No. And I recall a conversation about horseshoe theory a while ago. Here's another one, there are specific faction on the far left and far right tend to hate comedy and be overly critical of it. Perhaps it is that correlation doesn't equal causation and that the extreme ends of the political spectrum are attractive toward toxic assholes.

That said, I aspire toward libertarian communism and consider myself on the far left :D

Also say you are not allowed to joke about disabled people anymore. Would really suck for comedians with disabilities to not be able have the freedom to talk about themselves like other comedians do...or is it ok for them to joke about it since they are affected by it? If yes, then you cant really have any rules that goes for everyone then.

Well, you'd think that most countries giving comedians creative freedom would be the best thing, because whatever solution the woke population yearns for would create more problems than the original issue.

***To the mods, this topic should be in the politics forum, as it concerns state matters such as when freedom of speech should legally end.*** 

I guess it comes down to each comedian determining what they are and aren't willing to joke about. There obviously isn't going to be some official rules that outlines what can and cannot be joked about.