Alex_The_Hedgehog said:
Switch is selling a lot, everyone already knows that. But the system is almost 4 and a half year old, and some people are already seeking the idea of a future "Switch 2".
The Switch 2 would be, in theory, a new model of the current Switch with "next-gen" graphics and more power overall. But I was thinking, what if Nintendo is not planning a new Switch at all? What if they are brainstorming ideas to a brand new concept? Would that be too dangerous?
What do you think?
|
Your missing the "point", that nintendo explained themselves.
The "why" of why they made the switch, and it was the logical path forwards for them.
Software developement costs are riseing (even for nintendo).
(not nearly as much for nintendo, as their games dont chase hyper realism to the same degree as other platform holders)
It makes it so haveing 2 systems ( a handheld and a home console, that each require their own software, or ports) less attractive.
Ei. its costly, timely, and limits the amount of great games, you can then have on both.
Solution? do a system that can funktion as both.
Tada! the Switch is born. (the oppersite route, they went with the Wii U (a homeconsole that could work abit like a handheld)).
a Handheld that can dock, and draw abit more power, and act like a home console.
A hybrid if you will.
The endgoal, was always to save on costs, and time, with exclusives, to make sure you have a better catalog, and to have higher profits on software.
That is the reason behinde the Switch.
The question is..... why wouldn't Nintendo do a Switch 2?
Are you suggesting, either they go full on Handheld (no dock ability, no home consoles? or full home console (give up handheld users)?
Or go back to doing both, but then leave either 1 of them, as a weak system, due to limited resources for 1 of them?
Nintendo will do a Switch 2.
The question is.... will they be smart about the name?
The next switch, they dont want to fall into a Wii U situation, where people dont understand that its the "next gen switch", and you need that to play new gen nintendo games.
The obvious thing, that consumers understand, is higher number = newer.
Is it time nintendo adopts to the norm when it comes to names?
Or will it be "Super" "new" (although this could confuse, with the new oled model) ect ect names.