By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Assassins Creed Valhalla runs at 30fps on Xbox Series S

Otter on 05 November 2020
foodfather said:
We knew it would be running at 30fps on the XX since May, why would it run at 30fps on the XS?

Why wouldn't it? Series S is marketed as being in parity with X but at lower resolutions. MS built it with the same fps performance in mind but we're seeing developers are having to make additional compromises

Edit. Well yeah for clarity PS5/Series X versions are 60fps. Thats why this is news

Last edited by Otter - on 05 November 2020

Around the Network
JRPGfan on 05 November 2020

The 364 GB SSD storage for games was dissapointing enough (on a all digital platform).
Gears 5 would have dips down to 720p.
Now Assassins Creed Valhalla runs half speed? 30fps?



JRPGfan on 05 November 2020
foodfather said:

We knew it would be running at 30fps on the XX since May, why would it run at 30fps on the XS?

https://www.vg247.com/2020/05/12/assassins-creed-valhalla-30fps-xbox-series-x/

7 days old news:
https://www.dualshockers.com/assassins-creed-valhalla-ps5-xbox-4k-60fps/

"Don’t Worry, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Runs at 4K/60fps on Both PS5 and Xbox Series X"



burninmylight on 05 November 2020
RolStoppable said:
Today Microsoft lost me as a customer.

Which Linux distro are you going with?



vivster on 05 November 2020

XSS has always been the worst value proposition out of all consoles. Its specs do not fit the things it's supposed to run. Expect a bunch more disappointments.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Around the Network
DonFerrari on 05 November 2020
vivster said:
XSS has always been the worst value proposition out of all consoles. Its specs do not fit the things it's supposed to run. Expect a bunch more disappointments.

MS expect Series S to outsell X, will they be disappointed as well?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Barkley on 05 November 2020

If Series X is doing 4k 60fps then the S should do 1080p 60fps bare minimum. This is lame.



vivster on 05 November 2020
DonFerrari said:
vivster said:
XSS has always been the worst value proposition out of all consoles. Its specs do not fit the things it's supposed to run. Expect a bunch more disappointments.

MS expect Series S to outsell X, will they be disappointed as well?

MS doesn't give a shit about any of this console nonsense. So no.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

OlfinBedwere on 05 November 2020

Lately there's been a lot of absolutely dire ports of AAA games to the Xbox One v1/Xbox One S, with it being obvious that the developers just didn't consider that platform a priority in the slightest. It wouldn't surprise me if a lot of developers carry on with that mentality into the next generation.



chakkra on 05 November 2020

Yeah, the issue here is trying to force a 1440p resolution on it. It just doesn't make sense. To render a game at 1440p-60fps you would need exactly half the power than to render it at 4K-60fps, and we all know that Series S doesn't have half the power of SX. The math just doesn't add up. In fact, I am actually quite surprised that quite a few games are offering half the resolution with the same performance as the SX.