There was an interesting article on Quillette with the above headline, so I wanted to share it:
Some hightlights in my opinion:
It assumes that great powers must compete economically and militarily, and that one power can only rise by knocking down another. But for most of world history, powers great and small have cooperated to their mutual advantage more often than they have rushed into conflict. Just because powers are great doesn’t mean they have to fight each other. When powers decline the most important causes are usually internal, not external.
That is very true. Big powers can cooperate for mutual benefit.
The Chinese government is not trying to export communist ideology the way the Soviets did; it is more interested in exporting semiconductors.
To the point. What do people expect China does? They are a power based on trade, not ideology. So the biggest threat they offer is flooding us with products.
When educated people are familiar with another country’s language and culture they are less likely to demonize it.
Something I think is very much true. An interesting point that people pointed out, is that many chinese people learn english and other western languages, understand western media and science and are willing to learn. But the other way around is very unusual.
Let’s stop accusing our political opponents of being “soft on China.” Let’s be rational on China.
I think it is a general good rule to be rational on any political topic. All the 'we need to show strength' rhethoric shows restricted thinking and therefore a good chance to find only suboptimal solutions to a problem.Last edited by Mnementh - on 24 May 2020