By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Future FF7 Remake parts could be smaller than FF7R Part 1 to ensure a faster release schedule

Scoobes on 30 April 2020
Xxain said:
vivster said:

Is he really trustworthy, though?

No because:

Spoiler!
They already told us before the game came out that it be separate from the Compilation of Final Fantasy 7 and .. its not true. They made 3 references to it. Then we have the the ending statement that said " The journey to the unknown continues" . That was specifically requested by Kitase.

But the story is separated from the original compilation in that it's not the same arc.

Spoiler!
The presence of the wider Avalanche group near the start is already showing the "timeline" is separate from the beginning as it invalidates the events of the Before Crisis mobile game.



Get your Portable ID!

Around the Network
Hynad on 30 April 2020
Xxain said:
vivster said:

Is he really trustworthy, though?

No because:

Spoiler!
They already told us before the game came out that it be separate from the Compilation of Final Fantasy 7 and .. its not true. They made 3 references to it. Then we have the the ending statement that said " The journey to the unknown continues" . That was specifically requested by Kitase.

That's silly. How is making nods and references to the compilation, or building a new version of the story by taking elements of all the FF VII projects to make one cohesive whole mean that Kitase isn't trustworthy?



DonFerrari on 30 April 2020
Hynad said:
Xxain said:

No because:

Spoiler!
They already told us before the game came out that it be separate from the Compilation of Final Fantasy 7 and .. its not true. They made 3 references to it. Then we have the the ending statement that said " The journey to the unknown continues" . That was specifically requested by Kitase.

That's silly. How is making nods and references to the compilation, or building a new version of the story by taking elements of all the FF VII projects to make one cohesive whole mean that Kitase isn't trustworthy?

Because we gotta hate everything FFVIIR.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

HoangNhatAnh on 01 May 2020
DonFerrari said:
HoangNhatAnh said:

Other JRPG remakes could be done with just one game. FFVIIR is dividing into more and more parts to milk more money from the customers. It could be 10 parts, and $60 for each. I will wait till the complete edition come out, then get it on sale. Episode 1 was only 30 hour for the main plot of an incomplete story, not worth $60. I already made a comparison with Xenoblde 2 Torna, 30 hours to complete everything and cost $30 only. Still, this is very good for FFVIIR fans, they could play each part a lot sooner, and Square will get a lot more money for their next part. If I was them, i will divide FFVIIR into 20 parts ($60 for each) for maximum profit.

Um, but this news mean FFVIIR would be more than 3 parts, even 10 parts or more. At first, i want to buy the first part for $20 when people still believe it is 3 parts (though not completely sure, so i still wait for more information). And now, definitely not just 3 parts, 4 5 6 or even 10 parts, at this point, just wait for the complete edition and a sale.

Except so far no real number of parts was disclossed and the OP plus title was already dismissed as news because it is basically what was already said over 2 years or more. That they cut the game in smaller parts to allow faster shipment of the game. Not really that they are cutting it even smaller.

If all the next parts will be smaller than part 1 then of course there will be more than just 3 parts, common logic.



DonFerrari on 04 May 2020
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

Except so far no real number of parts was disclossed and the OP plus title was already dismissed as news because it is basically what was already said over 2 years or more. That they cut the game in smaller parts to allow faster shipment of the game. Not really that they are cutting it even smaller.

If all the next parts will be smaller than part 1 then of course there will be more than just 3 parts, common logic.

That is a IF, thus why I also used if.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
Farsala on 04 May 2020

Can't wait for Part 2 in 3 years :). Which sadly would still be faster than part 1, so they would consider that fast.



HoangNhatAnh on 04 May 2020
DonFerrari said:
HoangNhatAnh said:

If all the next parts will be smaller than part 1 then of course there will be more than just 3 parts, common logic.

That is a IF, thus why I also used if.

Considering Square's track record, that would be a very small "if" unless they want each episode takes several years to come out.

Last edited by HoangNhatAnh - on 04 May 2020

DonFerrari on 04 May 2020
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

That is a IF, thus why I also used if.

Considering Square's track record, that will be a very small "if" unless they want each episode takes several years to come out.

Until that, it is all speculation so no reason to call anyone a liar.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

HoangNhatAnh on 04 May 2020
DonFerrari said:
HoangNhatAnh said:

Considering Square's track record, that will be a very small "if" unless they want each episode takes several years to come out.

Until that, it is all speculation so no reason to call anyone a liar.

You mentioned it first, not me.



DonFerrari on 04 May 2020
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

Until that, it is all speculation so no reason to call anyone a liar.

You mentioned it first, not me.

As far as I recall you said I was lying, then changed to they are lying.

What I said is that it would end up making more parts than 3. And how would he be lying about it if he never said how many parts we are going to see?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."