By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Official 2020 US Presidential Election Thread

KLXVER said:
sundin13 said:
Personally, I think we should celebrate when people who have made poor decisions in the past change their ways. To say that someone is guilty by association because they respected someone who was able to break themselves out of the cycle of hatred seems entirely backwards to me. I think this commands respect, as it takes a lot of strength of character to disavow your entire worldview. Even more so when you then spend the rest of your life fighting to undo the damage you've done, even if you never manage to achieve that goal. At the end of the day, I am not to be the judge of that.

As such, I see nothing wrong with Biden expressing his respect for someone who had broken out of that cycle. I never knew Robert Byrd and I am far from an expert on him, but from what I know, I too respect him, just as I respect anyone who fights to right the wrongs of their past.

lol Virtue signaling much?

You know by making this statement you do no good to your own arguments.  Basically you are trying to argue that the President should be given reason of doubt and that we should excuse his past to what he is today.  But then you conflict that argument by making statements like this.  



Around the Network
Machiavellian said:
KLXVER said:

lol Virtue signaling much?

You know by making this statement you do no good to your own arguments.  Basically you are trying to argue that the President should be given reason of doubt and that we should excuse his past to what he is today.  But then you conflict that argument by making statements like this.  

Ok. What did I mean by that statement since you seem to be an expert on what I think?



KLXVER said:
Machiavellian said:

I like how you twist things.  First you show some video of Biden commending someone who use to be within the KKK clan and use that as your argument, then when confronted with information that shows you was gaslighting because you did not know the whole history, you come with this argument.  What I mean by that is that your tactics is the same as most tired political tactics.  You only present a part of the story to try and justify your argument leaving out very important parts hoping no one would actually do any research.  Then when you find your ploy blown up, you go back to strawman tactics to cover your tail.  You seem to totally dismiss the part where Byrd went from KKK to an active stalwart to civil rights.  Its not that he just opps and changed but he also proved his transformation by actually doing something.  See that is the difference between someone who says something and do nothing to someone who says they have changed and actually work their entire career later to prove that point. You see action is the biggest thing you can do to show how you have changed and evolved over the year.  In the President situation, he has done nothing.  He is all over the place and during the debate he has a softball question no teleprompter needed to give a concise answer.

Sorry. Ill be sure to include their entire life story the next time I argue.

Yes, you should include relevant context. Please do next time.

KLXVER said:
JWeinCom said:

Look. Honestly, fuck this bullshit right here at this point.

I brought up the reasons why I believe Trump is racist and why I did not believe his statements against white supremacy. You offered nothing as a counterargument. Instead, you suggested that Biden was as bad. So, I gave you a chance to back that up, and I looked at your evidence and evaluated it with an open mind.

I actually did the research, and presented a position backed by facts and logic. I asked a very reasonable question as to why I should not vote for Biden based on your evidence. 

Instead of giving a valid answer to that question, you accuse me of bias and rant against the left.

I have at no point accused you of bias or dishonesty, and this is the second time you're doing so to me. I expect to be shown the same courtesy as I'm showing you.

Oh stop playing the victim. I havent accused you of anything. Calm.the.fuck.down.

I am perfectly calm. I use curse words when appropriate. Fuck this bullshit right here is the perfect response in that situation.

Claiming that I'm giving Biden the benefit of the doubt and not Trump is 100% an accusation of bias. 

KLXVER said:
sundin13 said:
Personally, I think we should celebrate when people who have made poor decisions in the past change their ways. To say that someone is guilty by association because they respected someone who was able to break themselves out of the cycle of hatred seems entirely backwards to me. I think this commands respect, as it takes a lot of strength of character to disavow your entire worldview. Even more so when you then spend the rest of your life fighting to undo the damage you've done, even if you never manage to achieve that goal. At the end of the day, I am not to be the judge of that.

As such, I see nothing wrong with Biden expressing his respect for someone who had broken out of that cycle. I never knew Robert Byrd and I am far from an expert on him, but from what I know, I too respect him, just as I respect anyone who fights to right the wrongs of their past.

lol Virtue signaling much?

At this point you're drifting straight into trolling which seems to be a pattern as you get shut down. This comment wasn't even addressed to you. Sundin is perfectly entitled to express his opinion without this snarky flaming. It adds nothing to the conversation, and only serves to criticize a user. 

I really don't like getting involved as a mod in situations where I'm also posting as a user... but your behavior in this thread is increasingly appearing to be in bad faith. We're falling into a pattern of making broad allegations you have not researched, failing to back them up, then getting really snippy and trolly when counterarguments are presented. If the pattern continues, I'll report the posts, and in the interest of fairness will take no part in discussing how to handle them with the other moderators.



JWeinCom said:

KLXVER said:

Sorry. Ill be sure to include their entire life story the next time I argue.

Yes, you should include relevant context. Please do next time.

KLXVER said:

Oh stop playing the victim. I havent accused you of anything. Calm.the.fuck.down.

I am perfectly calm. I use curse words when appropriate. Fuck this bullshit right here is the perfect response in that situation.

Claiming that I'm giving Biden the benefit of the doubt and not Trump is 100% an accusation of bias. 

KLXVER said:

lol Virtue signaling much?

At this point you're drifting straight into trolling which seems to be a pattern as you get shut down. This comment wasn't even addressed to you. Sundin is perfectly entitled to express his opinion without this snarky flaming. It adds nothing to the conversation, and only serves to criticize a user. 

I really don't like getting involved as a mod in situations where I'm also posting as a user... but your behavior in this thread is increasingly appearing to be in bad faith. We're falling into a pattern of make broad allegations you have not researched, fail to back them up, then get really snippy and trolly when counterarguments are presented. If the pattern continues, I'll report the posts, and in the interest of fairness will take no part in discussing how to handle them with the other moderators.

You do that. Get other people to cancel me and then when everyone you find offensive is gone, you and Sundin and the other lefties can have a party. The fact that you dont see that you treat me like shit as well is astonishing. Do whatever you want. I really dont care anymore.

Edit: I'll just respond here to avoid further derailment.

If you think I have in any way treated you unfairly, please report any posts where I have. I do not have the power to hide reports from CGI, who handles all accusations against mods. You can also PM him directly. Anyone else who finds my posts problematic can do the same. You can also explain to me via a PM if there's anything that qualified as "treating you like shit" that is not technically a violation. I don't think I've posted anything that qualifies, but I've been wrong in the past and have apologized when called on it.

If you have anything further to say direct it to me or CGI through PMs.

Last edited by JWeinCom - on 05 October 2020

EDIT: Nvm, not worth...



Around the Network
sundin13 said:

EDIT: Nvm, not worth...

Damn right not worth it. But you keep snuggling up to former KKK members while supporting groups who tears down statues of people like Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass because they werent perfect in every way. Hypocrite.

Edit: At this point it seems like you just want to go down swinging. So, the prudent thing to do is thread ban. Claim it's because the evil leftists don't like what you're saying, but Sundin decided not to continue the argument, and you decided to antagonize and attack. Right or left, this is not appropriate behavior. The thread ban may or may not be lifted depending on what the mod team thinks. As I mentioned, I will not take any part in any further decisions regarding this. However, I would personally suggest cooling down, and probably take a little time off before posting in any other topics.

-JWeincom

Last edited by JWeinCom - on 05 October 2020

Oh come on J, why haven't you disavowed your Klan ties? I mean...

Ya have to admit it's at least creative when someone manages to fabricate a way in which NOT supporting Donald Trump is a form of anti-black racism. I think Huey Newton over here has totally called your bluff.



Jaicee said:

Oh come on J, why haven't you disavowed your Klan ties? I mean...

Ya have to admit it's at least creative when someone manages to fabricate a way in which NOT supporting Donald Trump is a form of anti-black racism.

Not really fair to keep going when they can't reply, so lets move on.



JWeinCom said:

Not really fair to keep going when they can't reply, so lets move on.

Sor-ry!



Jaicee said:
EricHiggin said:

Do you think the Prez condemning a hate group will really change their minds if they're that lost and can't reason? The Prez considers Antifa a terrorist group and yet his opponent and the FBI think, 'it's just an idea', so no big deal, no reason to condemn it. Isn't supremacy, just an idea as well?

When a certain group of individuals needs to be reminded not to cheer for the Presidents demise because he's ill, that should be all you need to know about hate groups, their beliefs, who they listen to, and how they react regardless. Seeing some of the reactions, clearly unreasonable people just don't listen or learn.

You weren't talking to me here, but this post implicitly addressed me (second paragraph) and also commented on a topic I haven't really voiced my opinion on very clearly as yet that maybe I should -- Antifa -- so I just wanted to respond:

Regarding Antifa: I've had my own run-ins with people calling themselves antifa on the social medias and on a certain level I actually agree with you: they're "just an idea" like Al Qaeda or ISIS was/is "just an idea". They're very real people and they're legitimately scary and dangerous. I really do think their whole "anti-fascism" hook is an exercise in projection because their entire purpose is to harass and attack (sometimes physically) really anyone who disagrees with their aggregate worldview in any way. I mean I know from first-hand experience that these people will gang up on you in huge numbers and collectively threaten your life over and over and over and over again, try and hack your web accounts, and will not leave you alone once they learn you hold one view they expansively define as "fascist". And you don't have to be a "Nazi" or even a Donald Trump supporter or a conservative at all for this to happen to you, you can be assured. Most of the antifa people call themselves anarchists in terms of their broader politics, but frankly they act more like the tyrants they claim to be fighting. I would denote in particular their fetish for Jacobin-inspired imagery, like their cutesy cardboard guillotines they often carry around. This is a serious psychological problem that much of the like "democratic socialist" left in this country has, in my observation. Like the Democratic Socialists of America, similarly, runs a newspaper called Jacobin. The main thing the historical Jacobins have been known for was publicly beheading their critics. ...Their's just something interesting implied there about the crux of what these people's goals are and it has nothing to do with making the world a better place or freer or more socialistic or whatever. There is something that's legitimately hateful about it.

These things said, it also isn't truly fair to suggest that antifa people, as they call themselves, are actually, literally analogous to like ISIS or to white supremacist organizations or others that have a body count because, at the end of the day, Antifa doesn't have a direct body count (...so far anyway). Like for example, a recent study of 893 terrorism incidents in the U.S. since 1994 found no murder that was specifically attributed to antifa people or other self-identified "anti-fascists" while, by contrast, 329 deaths were attributed directly to right wing perpetrators. These are also facts, to which end I don't know that "terrorist" is necessarily the right descriptor for Antifa. I'd characterize them more as simply political hate/crime network. They're also not "highly organized" like President Trump claimed in the debate. Antifa is decentralized network of anti-right activists. So I mean like when President Trump infamously compared the people protesting the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville to the "Jews..will not..replace us! Jews..will not..replace us!" people on the other side of that event who shot at people with live ammunition and of course conducted an ISIS-style car attack that killed Heather Heyer and injured more than a dozen other people, even if he were specifically and exclusively condeming the antifa activists on the counter-protest side and not anyone else there (like Heather Heyer!), the comparison still wasn't a truly fair one. It was still a false equivalency just objectively. To be clear, it's precisely because (unlike antifa people) I legitimately believe in freedom of speech that I'm against any terrorism designation that's not truly earned. Crimes should be punished, but people should be allowed to hold whatever opinions they want, in my view; even hateful ones. I don't believe in treating them the same way they would treat me. I'm better than they are.

All this said, I am human myself. To that end, it's fair to say that I legitimately hate Donald Trump. I have already said that I hope he dies from this covid infection and I maintain that position. That's NOT the same thing as saying that I hate you or conservatives in the abstract or just people who support President Trump in the abstract or wish harm on any of you. Your actions haven't killed anyone (to my knowledge)! And I mean, living where I do on the map, I know enough Donald Trump enthusiasts to know full-well that many Trump supporters really are well-intentioned in their own way and are by no means all a bunch of racists and whatnot. Like I'm not broad-brushing here. And yeah, I can understand why my aggressive way of condemning President Trump could be hurtful to you and other such well-meaning people who perhaps really just wish for America, or for their particular communities, to have more respect or at least acknowledgment as being of value in the world and not just forgotten or disrespected. I get that. But look...this president has the highest body count of any like almost in the whole history of this country to date, has utterly disrespected me as a woman as well my family and what it represents to me, and just caused me untold volumes of very real trauma ever since entering upon the political stage more than five years ago now, and I really, really don't think he's well-intentioned at all or has a soul or is even loyal to this country. He makes fun of people like my dad for dying! I reserve the right to be human and wish ill on such a person. I don't think that's unfair. I'm sorry if you feel indirectly hurt by that, but I really can't help seething with hate whenever I think about this man. I'm human! I ask simply that you allow me to be human instead of politically correct.

Calling Antifa terrorists is going a little overboard, as Trump does, yet no less worse than pretending like Antifa is just an idea. Aryan supremacy was also just an idea, and look at what it lead to. It's one thing if something is just an idea near conception. It's another if it's being put into violent practice, or used as cover for ill means. Antifa is tougher to properly label because they don't operate in a typical format. It makes it much easier to defend, whether that's by design or not. It doesn't however change the hate, chaos, violence, destruction, etc, caused because of it.

Well in terms of the numbers, it looks as though the accuracy is questionable. That's not to say they're false entirely. It does show left wing deaths which aren't zero, so if Antifa isn't considered terrorist then it should be considered left wing you would think. What exactly constitutes right wing for example, and at times, things that obviously don't seem right wing, are called right wing, can't help but make you wonder. Then there's the question about everything else besides direct deaths? Direct deaths are one thing, indirect are another, along with everything else. If a group burns down half a city, country wide in total, what does that equate to? That's not exactly easy to calculate and answer.

People need to be allowed to think freely and hold certain views, yes. It's how they put them into action if they decide to bring them into the public sphere. It's the reason why peaceful protests are legal, so as avoid hostile protests, for good reason. Just because you protest peacefully, doesn't mean you'll automatically get what you want either. Sometimes that's a good thing, and sometimes not. All people can do, is offer their best, and hope for the best. Nothings perfect and you don't always get what you want. Life's a waiting game, and to say it's complicated would be an understatement. Multiply that by 300 million unique viewpoints and you can't help but wonder how progress is ever made period. Gotta rise above. I agree.

The reason a conservative would have an issue with wishing death on someone has more to do with a question of morals. Now death penalty through the law is a little different because it's a system we put together and agreed to, but you still don't wish death on them, you decide logically based on their actions as per the system. While I would assume there is a very small fraction of people on the far right who might hate Dem politicians enough to wish an illness related death on them, which is vile, that doesn't speak for the vast majority of conservatives. That's not to say conservatives don't want people to pay for what they've done, but it must be agreed upon by the people, like the justice system. While it's not perfect, it's sure as heck more civil than many other ways we used to deal with people. Conservatives also don't like winning by default. Heaven forbid Biden got covid and died before the election. Conservatives would be sympathetic and disappointed. They don't want anyone to die unnecessarily and want to attempt winning legitimately based on playing by the rules of the system and what it allows.

Trumps not perfect and not the only one to blame. When you have an entire country to run, you're always going to piss some people off, especially those who don't vote for you. The American people being seemingly so divided also makes it harder for one leader to please both sides equally. The covid count is questionable in a lot of ways. The flu/cold typically kills around 60,000 Americans per year. How many of these people got covid instead of the flu and died? What about people dying up to 60 days after testing positive for covid, who recovered, then died in say an auto accident for example, which counted towards covid deaths? Forcing hospitals to hold off on services to focus on covid, while also heavily incentivizing them to diagnose as covid to keep money coming in was also brought to light. That's not to say no blame whatsoever lies with Trump, but the more information we have, the better we can ascertain how poor or well he handled things. The media likes to say American covid testing hasn't been the best because it should be based on pop, yet they don't do the same for deaths. Imagine that. Something people also don't ask themselves, if you want to put the blame solely on him, is how many Americans aren't dead because of Trump, like due to a booming economy for years? Beyond that, how many people worldwide aren't dead because of Trumps lack of war? I know these aren't easy to calculate, some would say impossible, but it's tough for everyone to do so because people don't like to focus on the good, typically the most negative, which is natural.

You can feel and think how you wish, but the problem is politics has been seeping into everyday life and in extremely negative ways like cancel culture for example. Conservatives didn't start that. They didn't bring political movements into sports, entertainment, etc. Everything that seems positive, also has a negative side to it. I don't hate anyone even if they hate me. I do dislike some people, but never to the level I wish them ill. It's a mindset that has served me well, so for people who do flat out hate, it makes me question them overall, but also makes me hope they can better themselves. I didn't always used to think as I do now, so people can change and hopefully for the better. Sometimes all you need is time.

A civil response is always welcome btw.