For a very long time I was against the system in Brazil as everything can be hacked. And after I saw how Nato was able to cause damage to Iran nuclear system that was totally disconnected from the internet I just thought I could never trust elections in Brazil again.

Then I listened to a podcast with a guy that works with the system in Brazil and started to explain all the tricks that happened in the past with paper voting and were so common, some really crazy stories on how the votes could be manipulated from the voting point up to the tabulation. So today I became a supporter of the electronic system.

There are also multiple observers standing near the box's the votes are collected into.
They follow the boxes, and the counting until done.

Its not possible to cheat, by destroying votes, or tossing them out or the like, without observers noticeing.

You get your paper ballot, go to a voteing place, hand it in (they check your social security number/name/adr, ect to see if you are who you are, and your checked off a list (they know how many people live in area and are voteing there). Theres no chance to vote multiple times.

The waiting in line in denmark is like 5-10mins at most.
You go home after and eat, and usually the same day (3-4hours after voteing closes) you have results.

Honestly our way seems vastly better than the american one.
Like someone said above, its just about manpower.

The American system is all about rigging the election within the confines of the law, because the GOP knows that an actually fair and democratic process would be unfavorable for them.

The electoral college itself allows that a minority can win the election. In the current election Biden has received about four million votes more than Trump, but it's still not a 100% confirmed thing that Biden won.

In the senate the republicans held the majority of seats (53 of 100) despite only getting ~45% of the votes in the elections for the senate. This is where the "winner takes it all" system strikes again, because voting districts get redefined to play the system. It's called gerrymandering and isn't a thing in countries where plain majorities win elections. The point of gerrymandering is to draw lines on the map that concentrate a large amount of opposing voters into one district while the own voters get a better spread across a multitude of districts. The idea is to lose one or two districts by huge margins, but in turn win a great number of remaining districts by small margins. That's how a minority can be declared winners of an election, because it's about how many districts you win, not how many votes you get.

Voting on a Tuesday favors the republican party, because many people who vote for the democrats won't be able to show up in time due to work. The reduction of places where people can vote is another means to prevent people from voting. In a proper democracy it's the norm that every town has its dedicated place to cast votes, but not so much in the USA. Voting ID, badmouthing mail-in ballots are other tricks in the book, just like revoking the right to vote for a lifetime for people who have served a prison sentence (this differs by state), regardless of the severity of the crime that was committed.

This leaves the question why the DNC hasn't made a bigger effort to change the rules to a more democratic process, because that would obviously favor them. It's because they are idiots and too concerned about the moral high ground, just like on the topic of nominations for the supreme court where they gave in to the republicans and did not get in their own nominee while the republicans did not return the same favor. This is why the tolerant left is dangerous for the USA.

This is how it's gonna feel for both sides.

To the record

I worked for 16 months as an intern on our electoral court. And I'm major in technology. There they explained to us how the electronic machines works and why is not factible to hack them. It's an embedded system, it's like saying you can hack an electronic calculator from distance.

The machines votes also do not cross the internet except in few smaller regions in the rural island-like areas and villages of the North, those cities does not have an access to the mainland by land, only by river. Otherwise all votes are transported into a intranet  managed by the state itself, it has no point to internet connection except on the supreme electoral court (I call it TSE) in the Capitol. This is the only server that in practice can be invaded or hacked

 Even if TSE were hacked, there is a hundred other regional and local courts called TRE. Each TRE counts it's own votes, only votes for president are aggregated and counted on TSE, and those TRE system cannot be hacked as they don't have worldwide web access. 

TSE mission is just take a look on TRE votes and make them public available. If anything on TSE were be hacked (which never happened by the way), it's just a matter of destroying TSE votes and asking TRE to send their numbers again. 

I'm also volunteer since I was 16 to work on my session in election days and as I worked I saw how the process in handled 

And the process is crazy secure. The only way to corrupt it is with a mutual agreement between the citizens representatives, the electoral courts workers, and the parties involved (in Brazil we have over 50 parties competing against each other), all them in the electoral zone, which can happen but it's very unlikely 

To the record

I worked for 16 months as an intern on our electoral court. And I'm major in technology. There they explained to us how the electronic machines works and why is not factible to hack them. It's an embedded system, it's like saying you can hack an electronic calculator from distance.

The machines votes also do not cross the internet except in few smaller regions in the rural island-like areas and villages of the North, those cities does not have an access to the mainland by land, only by river. Otherwise all votes are transported into a intranet  managed by the state itself, it has no point to internet connection except on the supreme electoral court (I call it TSE) in the Capitol. This is the only server that in practice can be invaded or hacked

 Even if TSE were hacked, there is a hundred other regional and local courts called TRE. Each TRE counts it's own votes, only votes for president are aggregated and counted on TSE, and those TRE system cannot be hacked as they don't have worldwide web access. 

TSE mission is just take a look on TRE votes and make them public available. If anything on TSE were be hacked (which never happened by the way), it's just a matter of destroying TSE votes and asking TRE to send their numbers again. 

I'm also volunteer since I was 16 to work on my session in election days and as I worked I saw how the process in handled 

And the process is crazy secure. The only way to corrupt it is with a mutual agreement between the citizens representatives, the electoral courts workers, and the parties involved (in Brazil we have over 50 parties competing against each other), all them in the electoral zone, which can happen but it's very unlikely 

Just to give you some perspective of scope here, Houston had only one single polling station for all it's 5 million inhabitants. Meanwhile, during our last election here in Luxembourg, our little capital city of Luxembourg has 27 polling stations despite only having barely 100k inhabitants. Heck, even just our town with it's 2500 inhabitants, while just having one polling station, had 6 lines depending on your last name (A-C, D-G, H-L, M-O, P-S, T-Z), and casting a vote only takes you 1-3 minutes depending how sure you are who to give your vote.