By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Do you dream of a day where gaming is more accessible?

 

Do you want gaming to be more accessible?

YES! 6 27.27%
 
NO! 6 27.27%
 
This is a dumb question 10 45.45%
 
Total:22

Gaming is far more open-ended and involved than books, film/tv, listening to music, etc. because of interactivity. I do dream of a day where you can play Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft games all on one platform. While there could be negative aspects to that, there would be a lot of positives. People can disagree with me all they want but I think dedicated game hardware will die in the 2030s or 2040s. Computers and smart devices will be virtually the only way (if not the only way) to play video games by then.



Lifetime Sales Predictions 

Switch: 161 million (was 73 million, then 96 million, then 113 million, then 125 million, then 144 million, then 151 million, then 156 million)

PS5: 122 million (was 105 million, then 115 million) Xbox Series X/S: 38 million (was 60 million, then 67 million, then 57 million. then 48 million. then 40 million)

Switch 2: 120 million (was 116 million)

PS4: 120 mil (was 100 then 130 million, then 122 million) Xbox One: 51 mil (was 50 then 55 mil)

3DS: 75.5 mil (was 73, then 77 million)

"Let go your earthly tether, enter the void, empty and become wind." - Guru Laghima

Around the Network

Gaming as it feels like it's too accessible. Going to sound elitist. It's a very mass market and when you go mass market you as a corp try to appeal to the masses more than the core. So many devs are so risk-averse now. It's a greedier industry now than ever. Way worse than Arcades ever was. 90s was best as it was still somewhat niche and devs were more prone to try new ideas to appeal to this core group. No one will care about Fortnite in 20 years. While people still remember and play their fave arcade games of yesteryear that were designed to fuck you over to spend more money...except if you were skilled enough you could beat em on 1 credit. Where the term 1cc came from. Do you think we will get a 1MTX term? So I wish for the opposite. To become more exclusive again.

The day everything is on one platform is the day creativity fully dies from big publishers. When SEGA went multiplatform, they abandoned most of their classic IPs and just focused on their big mainstays. You no longer worry about profiting from a game selling on 1 platform..but multiple. More expensive and easier to get lost in a release shuffle of other games. SEGA used to be an IP machine...then became a Sonic factory. If Nintendo left consoles in 2016 after Wii U. Series like Xenoblade would die. Astral Chain likely would have never happened. Those smaller budget games trying something new would not happen.

Last edited by Leynos - on 10 April 2020

Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

How more accessible can it realisticaly be? All software need a platform to work on, so it's not like we aren't going to need whatever hardware to play any time soon, and the technological advancements mean that better and better tech will be needed over time. If you don't want that, you could use streaming (which still needs your own hardware compatible with the service plus controllers and such) or just go to the arcade, or some of those gaming bars where you can play any console.



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

Ultravolt said:

Think about it. Pretty much any other form of entertainment is much more accessible than gaming. Want to read a book? Buy one for 20 bucks or less, then read it. Want to watch a movie? Go to a theater, or use a streaming service (Netflix), or pop in a Blu-Ray, etc etc... Want to listen to music? Buy a song or album for $20-$30 (maybe cheaper), stream it online, download it onto your phone, etc etc...

A brand-new movie for $15 - $20 in the movie theater or a new Blu-ray release for $15 - $20 will entertain you for 2 - 3 hours.

Most brand-new games for $40 - $70, less than one year old games for $20 - $40 and a bit older games for $5 - $20 will entertain you for dozens of hours.

Gaming is a lot cheaper per hour than watching new movies.  

Ultravolt said:

But with video games, there are *much* more barriers. Want to play a video game? First, buy either a $300-$500 game console, or $1000 gaming PC. Then, let's pay EVEN MORE money for the games themselves! $60, Brilliant! Oh, the console you bought doesn't play every game you wanted to play? Well, time to buy ANOTHER console, amiright?! Oh, is your PC not powerful enough? Too bad! I know you could use the argument, "But you need a TV or monitor to watch movies, and you have to buy individual movies as well." Except... it's not NEARLY as expensive an investment as gaming! Not to mention, you need things like a TV or monitor for games as well (handhelds excluded), on top of all the other things I listed!

First, buy a used Xbox One S for around $100, then buy GamePass for a few bucks per month. Enjoy all these games for a few bucks per month, including new games, classics, AAA games, AA games and indie games...

Or buy a last gen console with dozens of games included for around $100...

Or buy a used PC for $100 - $200 and play free games (f.e. the Epic freebies every week, many itch.io games), very cheap games (Humble bundles, Steam deals, GOG classics, Indiegala bundles, Fanatical bundles...)

Or buy a Switch lite for $200 and buy cheap eShop games...

Or play games on the device you already have (smartphone, tablet)... between the shovelware there are also very good games (most of them port from other systems)

And if your child/relative/friend can't play with normal controllers: buy him/her an Xbox adaptive controller.

Gaming has never been as affordable and accessible than today.

Last edited by Conina - on 10 April 2020

Do i hate it when people point to other media to give example how videogaming can be improved. Blatant ignorance.

Try develop AAA with nothing but a typewriter...



Hunting Season is done...

Around the Network

Yes, definitely. Console gaming is something pretty exclusive here, most people can only afford some cheaper PC games, because they can't afford a console and triple A games



People are coming down a bit hard on you,it's a valid question and there's always something that can be improved.



Immersiveunreality said:
People are coming down a bit hard on you,it's a valid question and there's always something that can be improved.

Or some things can be made worse. And that happens.



Hunting Season is done...

Hiku said:

OP, what is your solution?
That consoles be given out for free? Or that everyone uses services like Stadia?

Game costs more than books and music. Yes, because they also cost a lot more to develop.
Games require an additional system to play. Because that's the nature of games.

You don't seem to be describing any actual problems that can be overcome. Just stating facts.

Video games are a lot more tied to their hardware and its abilities than books and movies/TV. The latter two are pre-recorded images that play out exactly the same every time. Video games are meant to change, in varying degrees, with the player's input, whether you're playing Call of Duty or Animal Crossing, even with streaming, and streaming will never be as good as dedicated hardware on the user's end.