Again since woman can also have surgery, and certainly can fell if there is a condom or not and likely also see before (very different from making holes and not taking pills), doesn't make sense to again want a bigger burden "because he is a man".

Each one is responsible for own actions. So you can't say the woman got pregnant because the guy didn't do vasecthomy.

Both men and women are responsible about pregnancy, men shouldn’t be making babies if they don’t have enough money to raise their children, and women shouldn’t let unresponsible men make them pregnant.
Some countries in Africa have a average birth rate of 6 per woman, these are the type of countries that are producing the migrants that are flooding the west, and the civilized world has to pay health care for them.

From what I know even legal visitors doesn't have right to free healthcare nor in USA, nor in most countries as they aren't citizens.

Nations with universal healthcare (Most developed western nations!) they have the right to free healthcare.

Is the offering of benefits, sanctuary cities and discouraging enforcment of throwing illegals not examples of enouragement? Meh... maybe Im just making assumptions...

You seem to have the impression I support republicans blindly. I am not registered as one.

Hehe, you really believe tax hikes would only be on the rich? Thats funny, naive and not reflectice of other welfare states.

California's growth has gone down significantly. People are escaping or simply not moving there in the significant numbers because its becoming a liberal shithole. I live in Arizona and I meet people who moved from blue states regularly. Its the same reason everytime why they moved, cost of living. So if you have the impression dems only wanna tax the rich...

Right, many billions are spent providing services to illegals. Whether its healthcare, education, etc. It also varies by state and taxes will go to support them.

I'm gonna assume you havent met many people on welfare. I've had family getting like $500 in foodstamps for years and never working. They may have cut down on that because the economy has improved and people do abuse it.

That's the thing, dems want to little to no limit on the number of people entering while giving them all free stuff like healthcare. That literally is dealing with the world's problems. The failures of those countries is causing this illegal immigration. Yet those corrupt leaders stay in power and we are expected to pay bills of their people.

Its a good deal for those countries though. The remittances Mexico gets is a nice boost for their economy and a free welfare system.

Now maybe youre thinking if they all just become citizens they can pay taxes too! But the problem is they would not generate enough tax revenue to support a welfare state unless we are all taxed heavily... like other social states. You also cant tax the rich too much or they just leave, other social states consider that as well.

Do a little research please, your ideology doesnt work.

The concept of universal healthcare is nice, its just paying for it thing people won't like. We're gonna need a massive tax hike and that is going to push many millions of people out of private healthcare.

Again, what the democrats are proposing is far more ambitious and generous than what other countries provide. Especially if we have a massive number of people entering legally or otherwise.

I've gotten to a point I actually wish democrats were actually honest about what Europe or Canada actually provide, be honest who is affected by the taxes (spoiler: not just the rich) and of course admit other countries aren't as generous as democrats want to be. I also don't believe the other western countries have the same number of illegals coming in either. I assure you the democrats in the US do not want to just emulate other countries, that isn't ambitious or irresponsible enough.

There is a massive number of children with no father around in this country and that's mostly due to women doing a terrible job at selecting fathers.

You're absolutely right, men do pressure women to not use a condom. I've done it and its totally worth it! However, I'm also not a dirtbag who would neglect a child.

Its the women who get pregnant and therefore they need to really consider who's jizz gets in their vagina. If they want the jizz of a loser because the government will provide anyway, then the tax payers suffer. I actually want the government to really go after deadbeat dads, like maybe we shouldn't provide services to women with children until we figure out what is happening with the father. That would absolutely deter irresponsible women from making children with losers.

The onus of baby making is on the woman. Therefore I will point my finger at them (unless its rape ofcourse). I don't care if their lovers want some bareback sex, women should consider the risks or maybe they just don't care. "I don't need no man in my life! I got tax payer money!"

Yes, man need to be so conscious to shoulder the concerns of health and unwanted babies of woman as well while woman don't need to concern about it shoving the responsibility to man. All you say just show that you put man responsibility on this much much much above woman, just missing man being the sole responsible by a thin margin.

I do hope on your life you don't expect others to take responsibility for your actions because they led you to it as if you were completely passive on it.

https://fra.europa.eu/en/theme/asylum-migration-borders/healthcare-entitlements

Doesn't seem like most developed western nations offer free healthcare for immigrants.

Where do you get the stats from that men are mostly responsable for unprotected sex,do you assume that because you personally think it is logical or do you have a source to go to see the numbers?

Bolded:Do you mean that sarcastically or you think the "knight" part makes it a positive term ?

White knighting women is by definition is a pretty ugly behaviour.

White knighting:

A person with low self esteem who combats this with a unwavering need to aid others who may or may not need it. They usually have very isolated personal lives as they are very judgmental of others, surrounding themselves only with those who feed their desire to help and feel as a savior. Most commonly sighted in young men in regards to women, this is only a lesser form as it is usually only temporary, fading with life experience. More serious cases occur in correlation with chronic self esteem problems where the person needs to maintain a high view of themselves through self rightious acts of kindness. These people enjoy surrounding themselves with troubled individuals, who form a farm which is harvested for what they use as pseudo self esteem.

It might be discussable if it borders to or is sexism.