Hiku said:
When I said unwanted, I specifically meant unwanted by either party. But that's besides the point, so I edited that part out of my post. What does matter is that the frequency of pregnancy cons is not comparable to the frequency of unprotected sex. The biggest problem is men's insistence on having unprotected sex during those days, while refusing to get a vasectomy. Which is a safe low risk procedure, that is reversible. And would prevent any unwanted pregnancies completely. While also sparing women from the horrible side effects and risks of birth control. |
Again since woman can also have surgery, and certainly can fell if there is a condom or not and likely also see before (very different from making holes and not taking pills), doesn't make sense to again want a bigger burden "because he is a man".
Each one is responsible for own actions. So you can't say the woman got pregnant because the guy didn't do vasecthomy.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."