Fixed it for you

Women in the USA were granted the right to vote in 1920 with the ratification of the 19th Amendment to the constitution. The law was passed by the House and the Senate in 1919. Over 100 years ago.

its abit ago... probably under the brexit thread.... but I remember we briefly talked about modern day slavery.
It popped up in reguard to some area in the UK, where apparently it was "commond knowledge" that UK firms were exploiting people (slaves), and the politicans/police and everyone basically just looked through their fingers with it.  Was it clothes related? sweat shops? .... I remember being shocked that it was supposedly a issue in the UK (and more so, that apparently, leadership rolls in goverment reguarded it as "common knowledge" and just choose to not do anything about it (for years and years, and didnt plan to, even after journalists exposed it).

Wouldnt be surprised if in the USA, theres tons of illegals (mexicans) working under slave like conditions (effectively slaves, modern day versions), that then do stuff like pick fruit/veggies for the farms in the US, and stuff like that.

You think something like this only could happend in asia/africa or such but nope...

Nah, libs are way worse because they're hypocrites. One day they're protesting against cops and then you kill one for them and suddenly you're the bad guy.

Don't forget it brought us female Trump voters. The worst deal in the history of deals.

I highly doubt that K will actually read any of those sites.  Look at the lawsuits submitted to the courts and their rulings and why but instead just believe the talking points of the people who make claims in public but do not make the exact same claim in court.  I have made the exact same argument with some of my friends who support the belief that the election was stolen from Trump.  I asked them to go to any court case were they actually brought up fraud claims instead of procedural issues instead.  I even showed them a case in Wisconsin where the court Judge asked the Trump lawyers to bring all the evidence of fraud that the president was claiming in tweets to be reviewed and when giving the opportunity, they declined.

Even court cases that try to bring up dead people voting, out of state, not registered, when you look at their data, there is no way they can actually prove any of it or even show that these scenarios benefited Biden over Trump.  When you really research the cases you see that the lawyers had no intention of these cases actually succeeding, instead they were used as a means for the President to continue his public statements of fraud, while in court his lawyers had nothing.

It is a pretty damn good proposal. I love how so many people were like "Biden is basically a Republican and will never push for $15 minimum wage" and then it turns out to be the very first thing he does.

No, this is frankly stupid. Protesting is legal no matter what you're protesting. That doesn't mean it's good no matter what you're protesting. Which was the clear point of the original post. 

At this point, burden's on you to show that they were protesting something worth protesting. That they were indeed there simply to "protest election irregularities" rather than to demand their chosen candidate is installed, and that there was a legitimate basis for believing such irregularities to exist. Hiku and Machiavellian's posts are a good point to start. And, the response should contain clear positive evidence rather than allusions to the mere possibility of confirming evidence somewhere out there. No need to respond to this post (in fact I'd prefer you didn't because you have enough people who are wasting time on this), but just wanted to let you know expectations, in the case that moderation happens which is looking possible.

Fixed it properly. There was never any proven systemic irregularities that could have changed the result of the election. There's a reason Trumps 60+ cases were almost all thrown out right away, it was all just Trump trying to avoid looking like a loser, pandering to his base's echo chamber, and grifting money through his "donate to stop the steal" fundraisers.

First hand account from an officer guarding the Capital 

The Next Generation of politician in the Democratic Party that are now coming through that will slowly replace the old conservative Dems, a Young Democratic Socialist