vivster said:
KLAMarine said:
"Even off duty cops have the moral obligation to stop violence, rather than profiting from it." >I don't think this is so if police are heavily outnumbered: they can try to persuade people from going too far but getting too aggressive with a mob could potentially incite the mob further. On-duty or off-duty, an officer should prioritize their own safety first. Everything else comes secondary. One good thing about this latest mob is they weren't wearing masks: they could be picked up later after reviewing footage and photos from the attack. |
So then why would an officer walk with a violent mob? Why not just not be there? Why not just walk away as soon as the perimeter is breached? You know, for safety. I can tell you why, because they were the same racist assholes as the mob and they wanted to be there, they wanted trouble. |
"So then why would an officer walk with a violent mob?"
>To keep an eye on them?
"Why not just not be there?"
>Maybe abandoning a post comes with serious repercussions?
"Why not just walk away as soon as the perimeter is breached? You know, for safety."
>Gotta try something? Quitters never win?
"I can tell you why, because they were the same racist assholes as the mob and they wanted to be there, they wanted trouble."
>Don't speak for others. It's not good form.