Being what he supposedly stands against.

It's virtue signalling. The loudest people are always the biggest hypocrites.

Guy's on here, being condescending and poisonous to anyone who replies to him. All high and mighty. Claiming to be educated and unbiased, then you see that he's a massive hack.

Which is...?

Unless you're trying to suggest having a sexual kink that's the business of two consenting adults as being equivalent to pedophilia, rape, and domestic abuse.. which would be laughably embarrassing on your part. 

Ah, got it. You're one of THOSE people. Yeah I won't be engaging with you any further. 

Also, I've never been ashamed of the things I like. If anyone looks hard enough they can literally find gay porn of me online (Same username, by the way). Your ad hominem attacks mean nothing to me! this isn't even my final form! 

Please help me out here: what posts of mine gave you that impression?

https://acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/

"An Overwhelmingly Peaceful Movement

The vast majority of demonstration events associated with the BLM movement are non-violent (see map below). In more than 93% of all demonstrations connected to the movement, demonstrators have not engaged in violence or destructive activity. Peaceful protests are reported in over 2,400 distinct locations around the country. Violent demonstrations, meanwhile, have been limited to fewer than 220 locations — under 10% of the areas that experienced peaceful protests. In many urban areas like Portland, Oregon, for example, which has seen sustained unrest since Floyd’s killing, violent demonstrations are largely confined to specific blocks, rather than dispersed throughout the city."

Pretty stark difference from the narrative being pushed by conservative media.

You can't sit there and tell people to avoid shaming people and then in the same breath accuse someone of poisoning discussion based on your previous interactions with them. 

Also, what RJTM did 'was' targeted harassment. They attempted to dig up "dirt" on the user and use it to out them as a way to shift the conversation to shaming them for their expressed preferences on an entirely different website. Perfectly legal between two consenting adults by the way, so not sure why it gave RJTM the right to try to equate a legal preference with pedophilia, rape, and abuse. 

I don't understand the both-siding here. Runa's past interactions with people shouldn't absolve anyone of responsibility to follow the rules of this forum to not take things to such a personal level in such an inflammatory way.

I don't want to distract from the point of this thread much further, but all I can attest to is my prior experience on the mod team, and situations where Runa had stepped out of line it was dealt with several times. I don't really think it's a call either of us should be discussing, and I feel like if it's something that bothers you a lot, you should talk to either CGI or one of the other mods who have been here a while, if only to clear the air and being able to express how you're feeling. 

What the hell is happening in here,thought this was US politics thread and not the official dogpiling like on twitter thread.
Imo it is also unjustified.

As that guy got banned, you also went on and used Runa's personal Reddit account to shame her / as a personal attack.

I can't even say you're both siding when you already came with a negative preconception about Runa that made you defend an alt-right homophobe to try and appear balanced.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/04/white-supremacists-terror-threat-dhs-409236

"White supremacists present the gravest terror threat to the United States, according to a draft report from the Department of Homeland Security...Russia “probably will be the primary covert foreign influence actor and purveyor of disinformation and misinformation in the Homeland,”...None of the drafts POLITICO reviewed referred to a threat from Antifa...This draft document seems to be consistent with earlier intelligence reports from DHS, the FBI, and other law enforcement sources: that the most significant terror-related threat facing the US today comes from violent extremists who are motivated by white supremacy and other far-right ideological causes...Violent extremists almost certainly will continue their efforts to exploit public fears associated with COVID-19 and social grievances driving lawful protests to incite violence, intimidate targets, and promote their violent extremist ideologies,” the second and third drafts reviewed by POLITICO say. “Simple tactics – such as vehicle ramming, small arms, edged weapons, arson, and rudimentary improvised explosive devices – probably will be most common..."