Wyrdness said:
Not necessarily as it depends on design for example if smaller model used a new dock like lets say similar to this third party design below the older model switches would still fit in it. |
That's a good idea actually, making the "dock" totally different, I did not think of that.
zorg1000 said:
That's where premium or entry level models come further down the line. When 2DS was released, the original 3DS model was phased out leaving 2DS as the entry level choice and 3DS XL as the premium. When New 3DS XL launched, the original 3DS XL was phased out then when New 2DS XL launched, the New 3DS XL began to be phased out. Also look at PS4 & XBO. The original models were phased out when the Slim models released and they later received Pro models that co-existed with the Slims. The same could happen for Switch, this revision would replace the current model and later they could release newer premium & entry level versions. |
The 3DS/PS4/XBO did not have the Switch's problem of compatibility with multiple components like the Joycons. I can easily see a parent buying their kid a Switch Lite after his OG Switch was lost/broken and being confused why they can't use their old Joycons/dock with it. Having so many different bits and pieces out there, all of which share the "Switch" name yet not all of which are compatible with each other, just seems like a bad idea. Few things turn off consumers like confusion. As it is, the Switch is simple and easy to understand, they shouldn't mess with that.
Last edited by curl-6 - on 29 December 2018