Nah.Save for the dialogue options, nah, It wasnt watered down, it was just streamlined to make it more understandable. Fallout 3 forced you to pick an unchangeable class at the start of the game which was stupid. The second this being the perk system. People's obsession with numbers for some reason made them hate the change.

It was an improvement over it's predecessor, Fallout 3.

im not the biggest fallout fan, but nothing i have seen watching people play it grabs me and makes me want to.

that being said, way to much better and more finished games are out that has my attention. they would have been much better off pushing it back to spring next year and polish it up more and work out the horrible bugs i have read about. i believe that it might be something looking at a year or so from now with more content, patches, and better price by then.

so they put an embargo on the game ? hate when they release games like that. I would love themto go the cell shaded route, like borderlands. Would look much better than this outdated mess. 

While I'll always like Fallout 3 since it introduced me to  the series the original games  Fallouts 1 and 2 are far superior RPGS  with stronger stories and mechanics  and ever  since Bethesda acquired the series they have been watering down the RPG elements of the series  from game to game.

I mean you mentioned classes for Fallout 3 they didn't have much impact  on the game since when ever you leveled up you could put more points into you SPECIAL stats and including bobbleheads could level them all the way up  and you could choose whatever perk you liked so whatever build you had at the beginning of the game  was meaningless and you end up having an overpowered character.

Fallout 4 was again more watered down  with its RPG mechanics the perks were even more  dull then before and it became even closer to a shooter then RPG 

I mean for me part of the fun with RPGS is creating characters with strengths and weaknesses  and Bethesda doesn't do  that well the perks in their games and they came across as more vanilla then the previous titles.

Totally fair points, I guess. I can't handle ridiculously complex rpg's like fallout 1 and 2, but I understand they are great games for what they do.

Would maybe be better if people can just give 1 negative or 1 positive point.

You get comments like those on dev youtube vids, so it wouldn't surprise me to see the same happening on Meta. Just create a fake profile and talk overly positive, even in the face of factual evidence that your game is a steaming pile of objectively bad bugs and performance issues. 

I just watched this today at work during my break, I couldn't have laughed more hard:

Well... is it a flop now?

**** eat and drink mode. In one our ingame, i eat and drink thinks for one month in realy time. 
I only spend time with eating and drinking 
The other time i spend with looting eat and drink

I have no problem with honest opinion and reviews.... but when you give a 0/10 or 10/10 your just trying to break the system. 

0/10 big fat 0 for not being on steam, cant avoid bad reviews Bethesda and lie about your player count on this bethesda

0/10 SabinePling

Nov 16, 2018

0

 

**** eat and drink mode. In one our ingame, i eat and drink thinks for one month in realy time. 
I only spend time with eating and drinking 
The other time i spend with looting eat and drink

 0/10 PlayerForever

Nov 15, 2018

0

Online only? With big problems, like bugs, bad frame-rate, etc? That´s zero for me!

 0/10 luxar

Nov 15, 2018

0

El peor juego de la saga Fallout, básicamente es un Fallout con unos gráficos que para la época dan hasta vergüenza. Y lo que puedes hacer en el se basa en el ir a un lado, matar bichos y hacer equipamiento. No lo recomiendo ni gratis