By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Digital Foundry: Dark Souls on Switch analysis

Tagged games:

Trumpstyle said:

Guys this is a good port not a bad port, surprisingly it did beat xbox 360 in handheld mode, it's has slightly higher resolution and better framerate. Some graphics effects are worse though.

But I wonder who wanna play this game now? It's old.

People who didnt played before or people that want to play it in full handheld mode.



Around the Network
KLAMarine said:
JRPGfan said:

Its getting compaired to the xb360 version, and your not blown away by how much better the Switch version is.
Am I the only one that thinks thats a issue? like its not great if your console is getting compaired to last gen consoles imo.

The Switch isn't a console and the video is comparing different ports of a game, not consoles.

It's not?  What have I had hooked up to my TV for the past year and a half then?

'Switch' is Nintendo's next game console

Goodbye NX, hello Switch.

The tablet itself (which Nintendo calls "the Switch Console") is thin and pretty attractive.

https://www.engadget.com/2016/10/20/switch-is-nintendos-next-game-console/

Learn more about Nintendo’s new home gaming system at the Nintendo Switch Presentation, streamed LIVE on Jan. 12 http://ninten.do/6184889Qg 

Nintendo Switch™ console

  https://www.nintendo.com/switch/features/tech-specs/



SKMBlake said:
xl-klaudkil said:
Cool its portable but a prettt bad port.

You clearly missed the point of the anlaysis. It's a way better version than the PS3/Xbox 360, and is as stable as the PS4/Xbox One version.

Better than PS3 and 360 versions? It has alpha effects that look way worse than last gen consoles and the audio is atrocious.

As stable as PS4 and Xbox One versions? Those versions are 60 fps, Dark Souls on Switch is 30 fps.

I wanted to play it on Switch but not when the sounds are that bad. Seems like it needs some updates to become the version it should be at release. Still even with audio patched Switch probably isn't capable of the sound quality of a PS3 but if it can match the 360 version I'll be fine.



Pemalite said:
KLAMarine said:

The Switch isn't a console and the video is comparing different ports of a game, not consoles.

The Switch is a console.

AND a handheld.

Mandalore76 said:
KLAMarine said:

The Switch isn't a console and the video is comparing different ports of a game, not consoles.

It's not?  What have I had hooked up to my TV for the past year and a half then?

'Switch' is Nintendo's next game console

Goodbye NX, hello Switch.

The tablet itself (which Nintendo calls "the Switch Console") is thin and pretty attractive.

https://www.engadget.com/2016/10/20/switch-is-nintendos-next-game-console/

Learn more about Nintendo’s new home gaming system at the Nintendo Switch Presentation, streamed LIVE on Jan. 12 http://ninten.do/6184889Qg 

 

Nintendo Switch™ console

 

  https://www.nintendo.com/switch/features/tech-specs/

What you have hooked up is a hybrid.



GOWTLOZ said:
SKMBlake said:

You clearly missed the point of the anlaysis. It's a way better version than the PS3/Xbox 360, and is as stable as the PS4/Xbox One version.

Better than PS3 and 360 versions? It has alpha effects that look way worse than last gen consoles and the audio is atrocious.

I wanted to play it on Switch but not when the sounds are that bad. Seems like it needs some updates to become the version it should be at release. Still even with audio patched Switch probably isn't capable of the sound quality of a PS3 but if it can match the 360 version I'll be fine.

Well yeah, 900/1080p vs 720p and much more stable framerate vs terrible frame rate, while on other side you have worse sound and one worse effect.

I playing game on Switch for around 8 hours, on side bad audio on which you get used, port is very good and game is great even in portable mode.



Around the Network

I don't understand why they compressed so hard to 3.9GB then installed on an 8GB cart, would've been nice if they compressed a little at least 6.7GB for audio quality.



KLAMarine said:
Pemalite said:

The Switch is a console.

AND a handheld.

Mandalore76 said:

It's not?  What have I had hooked up to my TV for the past year and a half then?

'Switch' is Nintendo's next game console

Goodbye NX, hello Switch.

The tablet itself (which Nintendo calls "the Switch Console") is thin and pretty attractive.

https://www.engadget.com/2016/10/20/switch-is-nintendos-next-game-console/

Learn more about Nintendo’s new home gaming system at the Nintendo Switch Presentation, streamed LIVE on Jan. 12 http://ninten.do/6184889Qg 

 

Nintendo Switch™ console

 

  https://www.nintendo.com/switch/features/tech-specs/

What you have hooked up is a hybrid.

A hybrid what?



Miyamotoo said:
GOWTLOZ said:

Better than PS3 and 360 versions? It has alpha effects that look way worse than last gen consoles and the audio is atrocious.

I wanted to play it on Switch but not when the sounds are that bad. Seems like it needs some updates to become the version it should be at release. Still even with audio patched Switch probably isn't capable of the sound quality of a PS3 but if it can match the 360 version I'll be fine.

Well yeah, 900/1080p vs 720p and much more stable framerate vs terrible frame rate, while on other side you have worse sound and one worse effect.

I playing game on Switch for around 8 hours, on side bad audio on which you get used, port is very good and game is great even in portable mode.

The resolution boost is good, but the framerate isn't that much better. Blighttown and New Londo are the only places where framerate was a problem on PS3, and even then it wasn't always a problem. Most of the time the framerate is pretty close. But as I said, resolution boost is nice but the audio quality is so far behind it hurts the game on Switch far more than PS3's 640p and occasional framedrops did as it takes away part of the appeal.

Not saying it isn't an amazing game, Dark Souls with the drawbacks is still better than any other game released this year. Its Dark Souls, and it has the DLC which had to be bought separately on PS3 which makes it a better deal. Still its not like what the original commentator said that its way better on Switch than last gen, which it isn't.



GOWTLOZ said:
Miyamotoo said:

Well yeah, 900/1080p vs 720p and much more stable framerate vs terrible frame rate, while on other side you have worse sound and one worse effect.

I playing game on Switch for around 8 hours, on side bad audio on which you get used, port is very good and game is great even in portable mode.

The resolution boost is good, but the framerate isn't that much better. Blighttown and New Londo are the only places where framerate was a problem on PS3, and even then it wasn't always a problem. Most of the time the framerate is pretty close. But as I said, resolution boost is nice but the audio quality is so far behind it hurts the game on Switch far more than PS3's 640p and occasional framedrops did as it takes away part of the appeal.

Not saying it isn't an amazing game, Dark Souls with the drawbacks is still better than any other game released this year. Its Dark Souls, and it has the DLC which had to be bought separately on PS3 which makes it a better deal. Still its not like what the original commentator said that its way better on Switch than last gen, which it isn't.

Eh, frame rate was in 10s in Blighttown you dont have nothing even similar like that on Switch, and even in other parts game outside of Blighttown and New Londo there were dips below 20. Frame rate on Switch is much more consist in any case, and frame rate drops are much less frequent and much more smaller compared to 360/PS3, so we definatly talking about huge difference in frame rate. Look at link below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhoDHdJdcAs

Much higher resolution and much better frame rate defiantly means it better port despite have worse sound and one worse effect. Saying that, sound could be easily patched, I hope they will do that.



Miyamotoo said:
GOWTLOZ said:

The resolution boost is good, but the framerate isn't that much better. Blighttown and New Londo are the only places where framerate was a problem on PS3, and even then it wasn't always a problem. Most of the time the framerate is pretty close. But as I said, resolution boost is nice but the audio quality is so far behind it hurts the game on Switch far more than PS3's 640p and occasional framedrops did as it takes away part of the appeal.

Not saying it isn't an amazing game, Dark Souls with the drawbacks is still better than any other game released this year. Its Dark Souls, and it has the DLC which had to be bought separately on PS3 which makes it a better deal. Still its not like what the original commentator said that its way better on Switch than last gen, which it isn't.

Eh, frame rate was in 10s in Blighttown you dont have nothing even similar like that on Switch, and even in other parts game outside of Blighttown and New Londo there were dips below 20. Frame rate on Switch is much more consist in any case, and frame rate drops are much less frequent and much more smaller compared to 360/PS3, so we definatly talking about huge difference in frame rate. Look at link below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhoDHdJdcAs

Much higher resolution and much better frame rate defiantly means it better port despite have worse sound and one worse effect. Saying that, sound could be easily patched, I hope they will do that.

So Switch ports are better than a console that came out 12 years ago? Get out of town! That's incredible!