Flilix said:
pokoko said: Good to see ports and remasters have joined DLC on the accepted list. Next up, paying for online. |
Ports and remakes have always been on the accepted list though. People have been begging for lots of ports on the Switch even before the presentation last year.
|
I'm guessing you weren't here when the PS4 launched? It was a contentious subject.
specialk said:
pokoko said: Good to see ports and remasters have joined DLC on the accepted list. Next up, paying for online. |
I've never seen what's wrong with ports. Games should be on as many platforms as possible. DLC can be good, bad, or neutral. Nintendo has never done bad DLC IMO.
Paid online is yet-to-be-seen.
|
I agree with you. Ports allow more people to play a game, which is great, and they allow a developer to expand their fanbase, which is also great. I never understood why there was so much vitriol on these forums about ports and remasters before and have had many arguments over the subject.
I don't know if Nintendo has ever had bad DLC or not but I firmly believe DLC should be judged individually. Because game X has bad DLC doesn't mean game Y can't have excellent DLC.
I think paid online is bad in general--however, I also believe a platform-holder can make it a much easier pill to swallow by providing extended value.