http://www.vgchartz.com/article/270103/bandai-namco-developing-3-big-switch-exclusives-due-out-by-summer-2018/

Well, it's VGC lore now.

Yeah, but some From Software developed games are Namcos. Most notably Souls.

I honestly never saw your reply.And I apologize for that.Will reply to you by the end of the day, since now I have some appointments to take care of.

Funny thing is, I can.I understand completely when a company is trying to play it safe.Even though I find that stupid(and I will explain that in the other post), its their choice.The problem is that you say that its normal, and its simply not.Capcom for instance, says that its normal to support a new system with ports of old games, but then it comes other companies like Bethesda and Square that support it with recent games.Not even new, just recent, like Doom and Wolfenstein.You dont need to go guns blazing at the start, but you need to take chances, as any company does.MH is a safe bet to sell on a Nintendo system(a new one mind you, not a a recycled one), and Capcom knew a long time about the Switch, what it was about, and most likely what specs it was aiming for.I mean, by E3 2016 many companies already saw the Switch, so it is safe to bet that Capcom also knew about it, specially since it has close ties with Nintendo, being an important supporter of Nintendo systems and all.Dont you think that more than a year and a half isnt enough to make a port of MH World for the Switch?At the very least isnt it more important than a XOne version?It didnt even need to be day and date if time was an issue, it could have launched 3 months after for all I cared.But they didnt, and you can ask everyone here and they would all say it was a garanteed success on the Switch.This is just an example of course, dont just apply to Capcom.

Point is, if companies that are not usually tied to Nintendo did this, I would completely understand.But there are companies like Capcom and Bandai that have recent entries on beloved franchises that could work wonders on the Switch, but they did nothing.Instead they gave crappy excuses, while the others either just admited they were wrong, or just plain supported with some titles(not everything).

Open your eyes.Dont be biased.

Yes, but whether Dark Souls 4 gets made is up to From Software, not Namco. From Software owns the IP, and Namco Bandai owns the trademark. They need each other completely for another game to be made. And From has already said they don't want to make Dark Souls 4. Not anytime soon at least.

The type of announcements you should expect from this are Namco Bandai properties (my bet is on a Tales title, Gundam title, and an licensed anime game), not Dark Souls.

You know what?  Forget about that collaboration guess.  I'll replace that with Taiko Drum Master because it just seems like an easier game to develop.

I just feel deep inside that an exclusive Switch 'Tales of' game would sell well enough to justify exclusivity as long as it's good because it's not like any of the 'Tales of' games sold fantastically on the PS4 or PC.

Oh, I didn't meant to expect an exclusive Souls-title for Switch. I simply pointed out that one of the three titles could be a From-developed game published by Namco. Or not. But From being not owned by Namco wouldn't prevent that.

Dragon Ball Fighter Z, please.

Yes that true.

But DS also counts like Namco Bandai propertie, If some related Souls game is among this 3, that wouldn't be surprised, espacily beacuse From Software is alredy mentioned like Switch partner.

Namco Bandai??? AWESOME! We'll get mainline Power Rangers, Tamagotchi, and Pacman games!

You're really trying hard to debunk this, aren't you?