Yeah, right now. Because Eifert is injured.

Your attitude is perplexing, because you are the guy who traded to get David Johnson on his roster, a player who has barely scored any fantasy points this season and has been put on injured reserve. Why would you do this? Oh right, because you are banking on Johnson putting up points once he is healthy again. That's based on his fantasy points from last season and the role he plays in Arizona's offense.

But somehow the above can't be applied to Eifert who has been one of the best TEs in the league when it comes to TD potential because he is Dalton's favorite target in the redzone. There aren't many TEs in the league of whom you can confidently say that they have a good chance to score a TD in any given week.

Please provide a list of TEs from the current free agent pool that are more promising than Eifert.

Have you not seen Aaron Rodgers face? He is a rat lol.

Yeah, right now. Because Eifert is injured.

Your attitude is perplexing, because you are the guy who traded to get David Johnson on his roster, a player who has barely scored any fantasy points this season and has been put on injured reserve. Why would you do this? Oh right, because you are banking on Johnson putting up points once he is healthy again. That's based on his fantasy points from last season and the role he plays in Arizona's offense.

But somehow the above can't be applied to Eifert who has been one of the best TEs in the league when it comes to TD potential because he is Dalton's favorite target in the redzone. There aren't many TEs in the league of whom you can confidently say that they have a good chance to score a TD in any given week.

Please provide a list of TEs from the current free agent pool that are more promising than Eifert.

Yeah, right. You guys really want Eifert for dirt cheap and now you also want Kelce.

If I have faith in Eifert (and I have), then the logical thing for me to do is to keep him as my backup for Kelce because Kansas City has a bye week just like every other team.

It's not a waste in a 12-team-league where you can't fill your roster with good players to begin with. My starting lineups have been pretty much the same every week and there are at most two players on the bench that I seriously consider to swap in. I basically have three spots on the bench at any given time that can't be maximized to anything, so keeping Eifert isn't going to hurt my team.

Since Kelce is so good at TE that anyone else I could have at TE is most likely not going to get more than the one start during Kelce's bye week, I don't need Eifert that much. This isn't like the Rodgers + Brady situation I had last year where both were about equally good options to start at QB, so I didn't want to trade either one of them. I want to trade Eifert because I could need more depth at RB, especially this week because I will be without Montgomery.

I am fine with keeping Eifert because he isn't hurting my roster. What annoys me is the attitude of you guys that Eifert is a complete waste of a roster spot, making it seem like he's a completely worthless player.