Okay, you're thinking to broadly about this.  When I say change, he already made the change, at least in my view, the same view that was in the OP.  The change was that he was not one of them.  Not completely, at least.  In Wrestling, you have to look for the small nuiances about wrestlers.  We have big ones, we have medium ones, and we have small ones.  In all categories there are many of each big, medium and small.  But in wrestling, when you see that big one or medium or small, that is different from the rest, you know there is a change.  A small change, but a change nonetheless.  The change I'm talking about is that Donald is different.  Is it a big difference, herhaps not, but there is enough there for someone like me to realize there is a difference and I'm sure you can list a few things that he IS that is different. 

As for Bernie, I don't see it.  At least not that big a difference.  Bernie had different ideas, but not too different from Hillary.  Yeah he wanted to legalize **, and of course other things I don't want to research for the sake of this reply.  But ultimately he is the same as Hillary in my eyes.  He has been there for 30+ years.  He is less notorious, but he acts just like everyone other politician.  He goes on stage to talk, he has the perfect record for a political career, he will abide by the Demos as he should.  He speaks like politician does and acts as a politician does.  

When ask of Trump to acknowledge the winner, his answer akined to, "I'll think about it."  Bernies was, "yeah, I concede.  Because that's the thing to do for a politician."  When trump was against other repubs, his was, "no, f these guys, I'm not coming to a debate that's all robotic, logical, and maneuvered."  We hear Marco autoreply himself just because he's still so green.  We hear Ted "bundy" cruz, after all the stupid shit trump said about his daddy and wife, because it was part of what Dems or Repubs would do because of tradition, and still he backs the bastard.  When real people would be like, "No, Calvin, fuck that, you said my wife was a whore.  We ain't buds anymore.  Fuck your presidential aspirations.  Bitch!"

But no.  It's all the same answers.  Same people.  Same mindset.  Same actions in course to what's expected of them.  When asked about his use of loop holes in his business woes, Trump's answer was in the likes of, "yeah, I got it for 2 for 1 deal.  It's cool, it was legal at the time".  In that capacity trump is different by a big margin.  And again, that does not mean he's a good candidate.  But, he is a change.

Okay, you're thinking to broadly about this.  When I say change, he already made the change, at least in my view, the same view that was in the OP.  The change was that he was not one of them.  Not completely, at least.  In Wrestling, you have to look for the small nuiances about wrestlers.  We have big ones, we have medium ones, and we have small ones.  In all categories there are many of each big, medium and small.  But in wrestling, when you see that big one or medium or small, that is different from the rest, you know there is a change.  A small change, but a change nonetheless.  The change I'm talking about is that Donald is different.  Is it a big difference, herhaps not, but there is enough there for someone like me to realize there is a difference and I'm sure you can list a few things that he IS that is different. 

As for Bernie, I don't see it.  At least not that big a difference.  Bernie had different ideas, but not too different from Hillary.  Yeah he wanted to legalize **, and of course other things I don't want to research for the sake of this reply.  But ultimately he is the same as Hillary in my eyes.  He has been there for 30+ years.  He is less notorious, but he acts just like everyone other politician.  He goes on stage to talk, he has the perfect record for a political career, he will abide by the Demos as he should.  He speaks like politician does and acts as a politician does.  

When ask of Trump to acknowledge the winner, his answer akined to, "I'll think about it."  Bernies was, "yeah, I concede.  Because that's the thing to do for a politician."  When trump was against other repubs, his was, "no, f these guys, I'm not coming to a debate that's all robotic, logical, and maneuvered."  We hear Marco autoreply himself just because he's still so green.  We hear Ted "bundy" cruz, after all the stupid shit trump said about his daddy and wife, because it was part of what Dems or Repubs would do because of tradition, and still he backs the bastard.  When real people would be like, "No, Calvin, fuck that, you said my wife was a whore.  We ain't buds anymore.  Fuck your presidential aspirations.  Bitch!"

But no.  It's all the same answers.  Same people.  Same mindset.  Same actions in course to what's expected of them.  When asked about his use of loop holes in his business woes, Trump's answer was in the likes of, "yeah, I got it for 2 for 1 deal.  It's cool, it was legal at the time".  In that capacity trump is different by a big margin.  And again, that does not mean he's a good candidate.  But, he is a change.

You realize that Bernie fought to the end of the primaries. Even went so far as to have the delegates counted state by state at the convention. You realize that Trump has run before? Back then he wasn't flying off the handle and still demanding to fight even if he lost. And of course he couldn't deny the loopholes. But he is still denying all the sexual assault allegations even though he even told people how he does it.

Again you're right. He isn't a good candidate. But Politics isn't supposed to be entertainment. Its the direction of the country being laid out by the people. Like you said, if you are more interested in entertainment, then maybe you should pursue that interest more. Smackdown is awesome. Hang out and watch Smackdown instead.

Oh, sure Bernie fought for the seat, you always have to fight for the seat.  But when that was taken away from him, he fell back in line with everyone else and by default, he has to back hillary.  His party expect that of him.  In that, he becomes another Ted Cruz where he must back the nominee.  All that made him different is no longer there.  When a wreslter loses numer 1 contender, that's it.  But that Wreslter doesn't go out and tell others to cheer for the guy that beat him.  And in that, it's politics as usual, and in that there is no change.  The political system is a farce and a joke and apparently when hillary wins, they cycle continues.  And whatever party takes over after her, the same cycle.  At least trump is a wild card.  It's the devil we know and the devil we don't know. 

What does sexual assault allegations have to do with this?  Bill went up and down the white house touching tail all day.  None relevent.  And so what Trump ran before.  It was with a 3rd party that couldn't get their shit together.  Maybe change didn't occur back then, but now he has it.  Matt Hardy didn't have it until this year after he got broken.  None relevant. What changes occur when you mention any of that?  Every other candidate is still nothing but a polititican wholly grasping on to keeping this old archaic system that's not worked for a long time. 

And no, Smackdown is not awesome.  It's just better than raw and most of the time it only wins by default because of 2 hour format.  And please, don't dismiss my interest as nothing but for entertaiment.  It is a concern I have that we not repeat the same old ways of doing things that clearly has not worked.  With Hillary it's the same old stuff repackaged this time in her.  Great, Roman reigns again.

But there's a difference. If you have Matt Hardy being broken that's fine. Its just him trying to save a floundering promotion. Trump gets in and its pretty much the end of civilization. This election you're pretty much voting for the fate of the world. Its great you're looking for change and all, but this isn't exactly change that will benefit mankind. As crazy as it sounds, I'm expecting much better politicians in 4 years. This year voters have shown their disdain for the system. Next election, we'll get actual politicians that can affect real change in a real way.

And yes. Smackdown is awesome. I've enjoyed it ever since the brand split. Its no Ring of Honor, but its still awesome.

"Trump gets in and its pretty much the end of civilization."

Oh my Gosh, dude, that's hella assumption and speculation and you know it.  And we're going to wait another 4 years for a possible change when it's starring us in the face right now.  What, don't tell me you're holding out for Jesse Ventura.  Because have you seen the people running this year?  Bernie is done, btw.  Too old. I'm not saying we're going to get change with trump, but he's the better experiment than Hillary.  She's been wanting to run since Gore.  So she loses to Obama, but then 8 years later she's ready and better at it?  She's better at smiling, better at her words, better from being grilled on all her pass darken clouds.  Common, bro.

And no, rating would speak volumes about smackdown and raw.  No, not awesome.  After the brand split, it's a jumper cable, that's all.  Don't give them an excuse to keep being mediocre.