By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Clinton has clinched nomination-Also, Clinton or Trump?

Torillian said:
Kane1389 said:

You're being very intelectually dishonest here. Yes, US spends more than other countries when you count the amount of money, but when it comes to the percentage of the actual GDP being spent on the defense, USA is nowhere near the first place. This amount only seems big because US's  GDP is so much bigger compared to other countries

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

Furthermore, even if the US cuts the military spending COMPLETLEY, as in, they dont spend a single dolar on it, they still wont be abel to pay for Communist Bernie's bullshit ''free'' (spoiler:even then it wont really be free) college 

I'm very curious where you get the math for the bolded.  

The average college tuition (including room and board) is 23,872 a year (https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=76)

The estimated number of college students in the US is 20.2 million.  (http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372)

That comes out to 482 billion a year (this is assuming that universities keep their tuition as it is now) which the 682 billion mentioned before would more than cover.  

Also, if free college is so impossible for a country to afford, why do other countires already have it?

Copy and paste from Steven Crowder's website

POLITICO – Bernie Sanders 18 Trillion New Spending

FORBES – The Biggest Military Budgets As Percentage Of GDP

THE BLAZE – Top 20% To Pay Nearly 72% Of Federal Tax Burden

WSJ – Greece Struggles To Get Citizens To Pay Their Taxes

TAX FOUNDATION – What Evidences Taxes And Growth

SALON – Wall Street Journal Bernie Sanders Piece Backfires. Single Payer Health System.

CONSUMERIST – Federal Student Loan Forgiveness Plans Cost Govt Nearly $22B More

MODERN HEALTHCARE – Medicaid Costing More Than Expected

WASHINGTON TIMES – Obamacare Premiums Spikes

SLATE – Healthcare Premiums Skyrocket

HUFFINGTON POST – Canada Free Healthcare

Fact References

 

 

Furthermore, other countries dont really have ''free'' healthcare, college etc etc... Money has to go from somewhere, and it comes from insanely high taxes that the citizens pay for their entire lives. So you get 5 years of ''free college'' and then you spend the rest of your life giving half of your earnings away so that the others can have 4 years of 'free education''. Here is a good video on it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdYOjUqlcFA

Also, the reason many other coutries have ''free'' healthcare, college etc is because they spend almost virtually nothing on their defence. And the reason they do that is because they dont feel the need to, because the big bad imperialistic USA will cover their expenses and aid them, so that many ''liberal democrat'' western european countries can pretend to be the good pacifist, peaceful guys. In fact, I think I read somwhere that only 2 NATO members outside US (Poland and UK) pay their epected share on the military allience.



Around the Network
Kane1389 said:
Torillian said:

I'm very curious where you get the math for the bolded.  

The average college tuition (including room and board) is 23,872 a year (https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=76)

The estimated number of college students in the US is 20.2 million.  (http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372)

That comes out to 482 billion a year (this is assuming that universities keep their tuition as it is now) which the 682 billion mentioned before would more than cover.  

Also, if free college is so impossible for a country to afford, why do other countires already have it?

Copy and paste from Steven Crowder's website

POLITICO – Bernie Sanders 18 Trillion New Spending

FORBES – The Biggest Military Budgets As Percentage Of GDP

THE BLAZE – Top 20% To Pay Nearly 72% Of Federal Tax Burden

WSJ – Greece Struggles To Get Citizens To Pay Their Taxes

TAX FOUNDATION – What Evidences Taxes And Growth

SALON – Wall Street Journal Bernie Sanders Piece Backfires. Single Payer Health System.

CONSUMERIST – Federal Student Loan Forgiveness Plans Cost Govt Nearly $22B More

MODERN HEALTHCARE – Medicaid Costing More Than Expected

WASHINGTON TIMES – Obamacare Premiums Spikes

SLATE – Healthcare Premiums Skyrocket

HUFFINGTON POST – Canada Free Healthcare

Fact References

 

 

Furthermore, other countries dont really have ''free'' healthcare, college etc etc... Money has to go from somewhere, and it comes from insanely high taxes that the citizens pay for their entire lives. So you get 5 years of ''free college'' and then you spend the rest of your life giving half of your earnings away so that the others can have 4 years of 'free education''. Here is a good video on it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdYOjUqlcFA

Also, the reason many other coutries have ''free'' healthcare, college etc is because they spend almost virtually nothing on their defence. And the reason they do that is because they dont feel the need to, because the big bad imperialistic USA will cover their expenses and aid them, so that many ''liberal democrat'' western european countries can pretend to be the good pacifist, peaceful guys. In fact, I think I read somwhere that only 2 NATO members outside US (Poland and UK) pay their epected share on the military allience.

I'm not seeing the part that says that decreasing the military spending to zero from 682 billion a year would not pay for free college for all those current attending which comes out to 482 billion a year in tuition and room/board.  Where in all these links does it show that decreasing military spending to zero would not pay for free college as you claimed?

Let's ignore the part about how other countries can afford it.  Tell me how your statement makes sense from a standpoint of basic math.



...

hershel_layton said:

But, but, but...Trump promised to make 'murica great again!

 

 

They killed Percy! 

Now, as for serious stuff, I am no American, but I'd vote for Trump if I were one. Hillary is not only in favor of being more of an annoying interventionist (and no one likes interventionists) but has also proven to be bland and lifeless. We might as well ask Obama to stand for yet another term and get it over with! Seriously, nothing can change with Hillary in charge. Sanders was my original vote, but he's out... unless a miracle happens... 

At least Trump is against the ossified American government. Since he's the only one of the only two remaining, I'd vote for him if I were you guys (and technically, had I done so stuff for my boss five years ago, I might have been able to)... 

setsunatenshi said:
nominating a candidate with an FBI investigation and a pending indictment, while having the head of the FBI a lifelong republican...

brilliant move as always Democrats... o.0

I will throw a bloody bloc party in my Florida home if they throw Hillary off the horse! 



Johnw1104 said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:

I was reading in the Times a report that Obama is eager to formally support Clinton and take the fight to Trump. So that endorsement may not be far away.

He's always been close to the Clintons. If anything, I suspect he's just waiting to see how bad this Clinton stuff gets before he lends her his endorsement, as he could have essentially ended this race a while ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/10/us/politics/obama-hillary-clinton-endorsement.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=image&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

Achievement unlocked: Endorsed Hilldog



ooohhhhhhh



Around the Network

These are bad times to a citizen of the US, I really feel for you.



Dark_Lord_2008 said:
America needs Trump as President. America has leaned too far to the left with all the recent Political Correctness and Socialism. America needs an end to Political Correctness and a return to Capitalism.

America has gotten further away from socialism ever since Reagan lol, so I haveno idea where you're getting that from.



SuaveSocialist said:

1. Not when Trump is in the race.
2&3. And both are way better than Trump.
4. Going by his proposals, Trump would be even worse.
5. Trump is one of the "masters" who feeds politicians---by his own admission. Cutting out the middleman would remove the only potential buffer between corporate interests and public interests.  Again, Hillary is the better choice by the measuring sticks you're providing.
6. It's funny how you avert your eyes to how much worse things would be under Trump.
7. Those who actually care about America.  Trump is the worst choice in every category.

Trump existing is a perfect reason.  A vote for Clinton is less a violation of one's integrity than a vote that doesn't impede Trump.  You said you couldn't comprehend how a Bernie supporter could vouch for Clinton----Trump is the reason.  He's the worst candidate to ever run in an American election.  You can list every one of Hillary's flaws, detail every bad decision she could make in office and she's still the obvious choice when the alternative is Trump.

1. What does it matter that Trump is in the race ? You still have Clinton as an issue in the end ... 

2 & 3. I ain't looking to go into a pissing match any further when this is just a subjective excerise ...

4. He'd be better than anyone in the Democratic Party by miles, economic policy wise ... 

5. Trump's lobbying history is minute when you consider that he's spent less than $2 million in donations for both the Democrats AND Republicans in his ENTIRE career before launching his recent campaign compared to Clinton taking in over $100 million in donations. Trump is hardly one of the "masters" that I describe compared to the PACs. Clinton is an even bigger offender of buying into the peer pressure than Trump is by initiating one ... 

6. It's funny how the only thing the #NeverTrump camp is almost never critical of their own candidate. Is hate speech the only thing they can spew in the face of anti-PC ? 

7. People care about america in their own ways so there is no need to be disgustingly conceited in your entire groups beliefs, remember to quitely concede if you lose ...  

You either have integrity or you don't and with Clinton you get none so they still need to drop their own narcissism in the end ... 

Just because Trump is the worst candidate doesn't mean you have to settle for the so called second worst candidate when there exists much better alternatives like Gary Johnson. Sanders supportors are a traitor to their own cause or they never believed them in the first place I imagine of they are going to back Clinton ...



fatslob-:O said:
SuaveSocialist said:

1. Not when Trump is in the race.
2&3. And both are way better than Trump.
4. Going by his proposals, Trump would be even worse.
5. Trump is one of the "masters" who feeds politicians---by his own admission. Cutting out the middleman would remove the only potential buffer between corporate interests and public interests.  Again, Hillary is the better choice by the measuring sticks you're providing.
6. It's funny how you avert your eyes to how much worse things would be under Trump.
7. Those who actually care about America.  Trump is the worst choice in every category.

Trump existing is a perfect reason.  A vote for Clinton is less a violation of one's integrity than a vote that doesn't impede Trump.  You said you couldn't comprehend how a Bernie supporter could vouch for Clinton----Trump is the reason.  He's the worst candidate to ever run in an American election.  You can list every one of Hillary's flaws, detail every bad decision she could make in office and she's still the obvious choice when the alternative is Trump.

1. What does it matter that Trump is in the race ? You still have Clinton as an issue in the end ... 

2 & 3. I ain't looking to go into a pissing match any further when this is just a subjective excerise ...

4. He'd be better than anyone in the Democratic Party by miles, economic policy wise ... 

5. Trump's lobbying history is minute when you consider that he's spent less than $2 million in donations for both the Democrats AND Republicans in his ENTIRE career before launching his recent campaign compared to Clinton taking in over $100 million in donations. Trump is hardly one of the "masters" that I describe compared to the PACs. Clinton is an even bigger offender of buying into the peer pressure than Trump is by initiating one ... 

6. It's funny how the only thing the #NeverTrump camp is almost never critical of their own candidate. Is hate speech the only thing they can spew in the face of anti-PC ? 

7. People care about america in their own ways so there is no need to be disgustingly conceited in your entire groups beliefs, remember to quitely concede if you lose ...  

You either have integrity or you don't and with Clinton you get none so they still need to drop their own narcissism in the end ... 

Just because Trump is the worst candidate doesn't mean you have to settle for the so called second worst candidate when there exists much better alternatives like Gary Johnson. Sanders supportors are a traitor to their own cause or they never believed them in the first place I imagine of they are going to back Clinton ...

1.  The Clinton issue in the end is better than a Trump issue in the end.
2&3.  It's not subjective.  Trump has no idea what he's doing. With his constant flip-flops (often mid-speech), he either has no ideas or has no clue what his ideas would actually do.
4.  He doesn't have a policy.  He has a few random, contradictory soundbites.  "The wages are too high"  *one week later* "Wages are too low."  If you're going to claim Trump's policies are better, you're going to have to prove it.  But Trump hasn't made it clear what his policies even are.
5.  Trump claims it's a much higher figure than 2 million, and his tax plan is tailored to benefit himself and his friends the most.  However thin you think the membrane is that separates corporate interests from Hillary's own policies, that barrier doesn't even exist with Trump.
6.  The Bernie supporters are indeed critical of Hillary; that's why they are Bernie supporters--most of them were Hillary supporters at one point.  Trump is just objectively worse.
7.  So you agree with me then.  

Integrity is the strength of one's convictions, not an indicator of what those convictions are.  An action that makes it easier for Trump to become President is arguably a violation of one's integrity if their convictions aligned with Bernie's---even Bernie himself has said that Clinton aligns much, much closer to himself than Trump and that a Trump presidency should be refused.  

If you think it's a question of integrity: you have it or you don't, Bernie supporters would easily demonstrate their integrity by choosing Clinton over Gary now that Trump's the Republican nominee.

I won't think less of you if you disagree, but I will lose faith in you if you still cannot comprehend.



SuaveSocialist said:

1.  The Clinton issue in the end is better than a Trump issue in the end.
2&3.  It's not subjective.  Trump has no idea what he's doing. With his constant flip-flops (often mid-speech), he either has no ideas or has no clue what his ideas would actually do.
4.  He doesn't have a policy.  He has a few random, contradictory soundbites.  "The wages are too high"  *one week later* "Wages are too low."  If you're going to claim Trump's policies are better, you're going to have to prove it.  But Trump hasn't made it clear what his policies even are.
5.  Trump claims it's a much higher figure than 2 million, and his tax plan is tailored to benefit himself and his friends the most.  However thin you think the membrane is that separates corporate interests from Hillary's own policies, that barrier doesn't even exist with Trump.
6.  The Bernie supporters are indeed critical of Hillary; that's why they are Bernie supporters--most of them were Hillary supporters at one point.  Trump is just objectively worse.
7.  So you agree with me then.  

Integrity is the strength of one's convictions, not an indicator of what those convictions are.  An action that makes it easier for Trump to become President is arguably a violation of one's integrity if their convictions aligned with Bernie's---even Bernie himself has said that Clinton aligns much, much closer to himself than Trump and that a Trump presidency should be refused.  

If you think it's a question of integrity: you have it or you don't, Bernie supporters would easily demonstrate their integrity by choosing Clinton over Gary now that Trump's the Republican nominee.

I won't think less of you if you disagree, but I will lose faith in you if you still cannot comprehend.

1. Better is arguable ... 

2 & 3. That's his appeal, him having no idea what to do means he's incorruptible no matter what happens and if he's a flip flopper then so is Clinton with her voting record ... 

4. He's not clear on everything but that doesn't mean he doesn't have a stance from which he can create policies from ... 

5. According to authoritative sources such as OpenSecrets.org and FollowtheMoney.org, Trump has spent less than 2 million in total and that's a modest amount no matter what you think or what he says. Your totally wrong about his tax plans too since he's in FAVOUR of HIGHER taxes for the RICH to pay off the national debt to which not even Clinton cares enough to pay the bills. Trump serves his OWN corporate interests, not to others and that is far better than been at the mercy of others ... 

6. I wonder if Sanders supporters are critical about Sanders himself ... 

7. In no way did I agree with you ... 

You don't refuse presidency to maintain integrity, you maintain integrity by standing in your own beliefs. There is only cowardice in following a crowd you don't believe in, no integrity at all to be had in doing that so Sanders supporters backing Clinton means that their convictions are weak and fickle since they didn't have the strength to stand on their own ideals ... 

Integrity isn't about winning or losing, Sanders supporters have no principles or ethics to stand on if they cannot show their own humility. Instead of voting for Gary Johnson or Hillary Clinton they should be WRITING IN Bernie Sanders. If they can't do that then they don't deserve the honor of being a Sanders supporters and instead should redirect themselves as the rest of the insignificant #NeverTrump clones out there ...