1. Better is arguable ... 

2 & 3. That's his appeal, him having no idea what to do means he's incorruptible no matter what happens and if he's a flip flopper then so is Clinton with her voting record ... 

4. He's not clear on everything but that doesn't mean he doesn't have a stance from which he can create policies from ... 

5. According to authoritative sources such as OpenSecrets.org and FollowtheMoney.org, Trump has spent less than 2 million in total and that's a modest amount no matter what you think or what he says. Your totally wrong about his tax plans too since he's in FAVOUR of HIGHER taxes for the RICH to pay off the national debt to which not even Clinton cares enough to pay the bills. Trump serves his OWN corporate interests, not to others and that is far better than been at the mercy of others ... 

6. I wonder if Sanders supporters are critical about Sanders himself ... 

7. In no way did I agree with you ... 

You don't refuse presidency to maintain integrity, you maintain integrity by standing in your own beliefs. There is only cowardice in following a crowd you don't believe in, no integrity at all to be had in doing that so Sanders supporters backing Clinton means that their convictions are weak and fickle since they didn't have the strength to stand on their own ideals ... 

Integrity isn't about winning or losing, Sanders supporters have no principles or ethics to stand on if they cannot show their own humility. Instead of voting for Gary Johnson or Hillary Clinton they should be WRITING IN Bernie Sanders. If they can't do that then they don't deserve the honor of being a Sanders supporters and instead should redirect themselves as the rest of the insignificant #NeverTrump clones out there ... 

1.  You are free to argue against it, but you'd be wrong.

2&3.  So you've gone from "subjective" to admitting it is "objective".  Very good.  Trump is aimless and clueless.

4.  Thanks for the list of vague, often contradictory statements.  Here's another one: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/donald-trump-2016-contradictions-213869  Trump has no stance, no convictions and no integrity.

5. No, the rich are the ones who benefit most from his tax "plan". http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/analysis-donald-trumps-tax-plan  Who knows, though?  He's flip-flopped so many times there's no telling what his tax "plan" would look like if he ever actually settles on one.  The Joker is more consistent.

6.  They have voiced numerous criticisms throughout his campaign.  

7.  you said "People care about america in their own ways", so by your very words you agree that there are people who will vouch for Clinton against Trump for that very reason.  Because they care about America.  This is where you quietly concede that you've lost. :)

If your convictions see Trump as diamtrically opposed to them, it would not violate one's integrity to cast a ballot with the intent to keep him out of office.  It's too bad you couldn't comprehend that, I had such faith in you.

I've read over half of it and haven't found anything that changes my opinion that he's the best candidate - to the contrary, he only gained extra points in my eyes. He was born in Canada? Oh please. At least this time it's on your continent. He's religious? Good. He's bad for women? No, he's bad for feminists - and that's yet another point for Mr. Cruz. There aren't many things I enjoy more than watching Milo Yiannopoulos destroy and humiliate them Climate change? We know it's bullshit. It's nice to care about the climate and USA could start to control itself a bit more, but going overboard (like we're doing it in Europe) is even more stupid.

So yeah, can't see anything that puts me off.

But the bottom line is, he's the only guy who puts it straight, that Putin is a threat to Europe and that USA can't leave Europe alone, cause the German-Russia duo are starting to stir shit up over here again. And unfortunately, that is the bloody truth. When I hear Clinton talking pro-Russian bullshit, saying they'll lift the sanctions, take troops from here or on other ocasions they are straight up attacking and insulting my country - the only country in whole Europe that actually wants to be your allies - all this makes me think that she has absolutely no idea about what's going on in Europe and should she win, it can get really ugly really fast.

@Military spendings - I know all that. But are you aware that you spend this money... In USA, right? So this money helps finance American companies, research, science, etc. How many people would lose jobs? Quite a lot I think. And your position in the world would start to deteriorate, which would hit your trade and economy as well. I mean, you've got China on the rise, challenging you everywhere, going back now is the stupidest thing you could do. Your fleet is the only thing that keeps you where you are.

I've read over half of it and haven't found anything that changes my opinion that he's the best candidate - to the contrary, he only gained extra points in my eyes. He was born in Canada? Oh please. At least this time it's on your continent. He's religious? Good. He's bad for women? No, he's bad for feminists - and that's yet another point for Mr. Cruz. There aren't many things I enjoy more than watching Milo Yiannopoulos destroy and humiliate them Climate change? We know it's bullshit. It's nice to care about the climate and USA could start to control itself a bit more, but going overboard (like we're doing it in Europe) is even more stupid.

So yeah, can't see anything that puts me off.

But the bottom line is, he's the only guy who puts it straight, that Putin is a threat to Europe and that USA can't leave Europe alone, cause the German-Russia duo are starting to stir shit up over here again. And unfortunately, that is the bloody truth. When I hear Clinton talking pro-Russian bullshit, saying they'll lift the sanctions, take troops from here or on other ocasions they are straight up attacking and insulting my country - the only country in whole Europe that actually wants to be your allies - all this makes me think that she has absolutely no idea about what's going on in Europe and should she win, it can get really ugly really fast.

@Military spendings - I know all that. But are you aware that you spend this money... In USA, right? So this money helps finance American companies, research, science, etc. How many people would lose jobs? Quite a lot I think. And your position in the world would start to deteriorate, which would hit your trade and economy as well. I mean, you've got China on the rise, challenging you everywhere, going back now is the stupidest thing you could do. Your fleet is the only thing that keeps you where you are.

Why so condescending ? 

1. It's not so uncommon that people can't see the other side afterall ... 

2 & 3. There you go again getting yourself into the pissing match ... 

4. Just admit that you were patently wrong about him having no stance, passing a lie doesn't help your case ... 

5. Analysis =/= Evidence, Statement = Claim so I'll take words of a nonpolitician over some paper ... 

6. Then why isn't #NeverSanders trending higher despite getting less votes than either Clinton or Trump in the primaries ? 

7. It also means to be not so arrogant and highly parroting against the opposing side but it's no wonder that the #NeverTrump camp couldn't see that and get so extremely self-absorbed in their own superiority complex ... (No wonder I find Trump supporters to be 100x more humble than Clinton supporters and 10x more humble than Sanders supporters.) As for quietly conceding, I mean that after election results. Win or lose, one side is going to have shut it no matter how loud they get ...  

Cowardice =/= Integrity ... 

I wonder if Sanders supporters are are willing to opt in for Ted Cruz as the democratic nominee if it weren't Clinton just to spite Trump or will their hatred keep clouding their judgement ? *rolls eyes*

To me, Sanders is best, Trump a close second and Hillary the worst. What can you conclude from this? 

To me, Sanders is best, Trump a close second and Hillary the worst. What can you conclude from this? 

That would depend if your anti-establishment or you could be in the #NeverHillary camp ... 

I can see some common appeal between Trump and sanders but they are very different beasts ... 

Sanders is full on socialist whereas Trump is a regular moderate conservative ... 

If it were between Sanders and Clinton I would pick the former just on the basis that he goes against the government ... 

Both Trump and Sanders are the governments worst enemy whereas Clinton is their best friend ... 

I would tentatively infer that you are very strongly against the establishment politicians, but recognize the fact that Trump is a lunatic of a candidate (thus preferring Sanders), yet hate the establishment even more (thus Trump over Clinton by a long way).  You figure that whatever Trump breaks, he's at least going to get things done and shake up Washington.  Am I close?