Forums - Nintendo Discussion - About Star Fox Zero graphics

Graphics are:

Amazing! 74 14.98%
 
Nice, just a bit outdated 221 44.74%
 
Pretty bad 86 17.41%
 
Terrible 67 13.56%
 
Do a barrel roll 46 9.31%
 
Total:494

In my opinion it looks amazing and incomparable.



Around the Network

I'm not going to lie - I'm starting to see the improvement everyone else saw with this video.

I still think it looks incredebly sub-par, both graphically and artistically, but I'm not going to lie and say it still looks like garbage. It doesn't.

Does the game look like a good single-player entry to the Star Fox franchise? No. But Hopefully playing with my sister will alleviate some of what is absolutely disastrous game design. And hopefully they don't take the piss in the next Star Fox game and design something that's actually modern and worth the asking price.

That being said, I wouldn't mind cock-pit mode being restricted to a co-op mode in future Star Fox games. I like the idea of being able to play with my sister. I don't see why there can't be an auto-aim feature for people who rightfully think that playing with the gamepad by yourself is shitty.



Well, this is new.

Read.

Looks fine to me, mind you I still find some Gamecube games pleasing on the eye. Gameplay is king.



Goodnightmoon said:
daredevil.shark said:
If you are comparing it early Xbox 360 games then it's passable. If you are comparing it with 8th gen game ((Ratchet and Clank) then it's no where near. There is a gen (more) difference.

I'm not really comparing, I'm just asking if they look nice or bad. If we have to chose a system to compere, obviously it would be X360, but thats something we already know from the start with the WiiU.

1. I stated Xbox 360 because of resolution. GameCube or PS2 had 480p resolution (if I am not mistaken). So it's kinda 7th gen.

2. As for graphics it looks like GameCube level visuals. It has more animations. But overall dual display and 60fps is too much for the system.



It still looks like an early 360 game no matter what people try and convince themselves that this game is at any where near good looking graphical wise. I mean look at the environments like the ground and the mountains. they look terrible. A lot of the models look decent since they used some like polish on them but the game is overall ugly with a terrible art style. But it has good water, so there is something.



     

Check out my lastest games review: Fast RMX and  Snipperclips: Cut it out Together

Around the Network

The style fits most of the time. But environments are ok at best. And actually the same goes for enemies and some FX. Sometimes they look pretty bad. Being far from constant 60fps it's still disappointing overall.



The video is missing some of the best looking places of the game like Fortuna and Titania, so I'll leave it here.

  



Game looks awesome, chief.



I´m ok with the graphics. I think its graphics are good enough. Nothing impressive, but good and with a great art style



the geometry looks pretty N64/GC, not everything else.

I like it though. I love those consoles.



I LOVE ICELAND!