inconvenient truth, the first few years of blu-ray were pretty dismal, hd-dvd versions of things available on bluray also, looked better on hd-dvd, because the VC-1 codec used was better than the MPEG2 used for bluray.
inconvenient truth, the first few years of blu-ray were pretty dismal, hd-dvd versions of things available on bluray also, looked better on hd-dvd, because the VC-1 codec used was better than the MPEG2 used for bluray.
I wouldn't really call it "support". I mean Oculus was and it will always be a Windows device. So any direct involvement from MS for good or bad will have no impact on its success.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
HD DVD lost because Sony pulled out their cheque book in the last hour to sign over major studios to BluRay. Once they went everyone followed.
| aLkaLiNE said:
|
It's cool, I just feel that while they aren't smart at making some decisions, I don't really believe they are evil as fuck like some make them out to be =P.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
| kitler53 said: and by that i mean a doomed technology publically backed by MS but given no real investment by MS to ensure its success. OR will fail in all aspects except the one thing MS cares about,.. disrupt and prevent the adoption of VR devices and force sony/valve to loose large amounts of money while ms waits for the market to jump into the next set of techology. for HD DVD it was waiting for digital distribution to become feasible with faster internet and larger storage devices, for VR it is waiting for hololense technology to become practically priced and software suport to increase. |
Or VR will fail miserably on its own, without any intervention from MS, and we might lay all the conspiracy theories on the side? :).
I don't think its a ridiculous stance to assume but here are some MAJOR ways in which its different:
Oculus and Morpheus fulfil different niches to some extent, Oculus does not currently work with the most popular gaming device out and I don't think it will anytime soon if the most MS can get out of it regarding Xbox One is streaming which essentially is not VR. Vice versa there is a hardcore PC crowd and Oculus will be their go to.
HD-DVD was not bought by facebook moments before its commercial release, they have long term plans.
VR doesn't begin and end with Oculus and Morpheus, it will be a multigenerational effort, unlike HD-DVD/Bluray which were are probably the last introduction of "next gen" discs/entertainment storage media we will see for another 10+ years. We may get updated bluray disc but I suspect nothing more.
Facebook will make sure you'll be able to be with your grandchildren birthday party even when you live 1000 miles away..







Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!)
Normchacho said:
Valve as of right now pretty much owns the PC gaming space and have a good reputation amongst PC gamers. On top of that, their headset is likely going to be the first to market and will pack the best hardware. It will be more expensive, but for the people that are willing to throw down the kind of money for a PC that will even run a VR headset, and the early adopters that are going to be so important to VRs sucess, that better hardware and early launch are going to be important. Sony is the only one without a major partner because they're the only one who doesn't need one. Sony does hardware and software all by themselves. The Morpheus will most likely be the cheapest of the three headsets and will require the smallest investment to be able to use, which means that it will be the most mass market friendly. Being on console also means that it will have no direct competitor. The Rift though, could end up in a tight spot. It's going to launch after the Vive and won't be as good of hardware. It will be cheaper but likely still far from cheap with the CEO quoted as saying that the headset and PC to run it together should cost around $1500. They also don't have the established fanbase or storefront from which to market their headset or it's games. Edit: I forgot to mention that Oculus is owned by Facebook now. Which has not been a very popular change amongst the very people they need to buy it when it launches next year. |
+ 1
also I would believe Microsoft and oculus partnership will do more harm to VR than benefit anyone of them. I just hope casual adopter of VR, doesn't get the impression, that VR is all about sitting in a virtual room and play game on a screen front.. and that morpheus and HTC vive will be the same.
Also I agree with the OP, the way MS implemented HD DVD to 360, just to play movies and not games. xbox1 VR implementation is in the same league as HD DVD was. tacked on.

Except this causes people to throw up. I have no desire for this device.
I agree VR is going to fail, but I doubt Microsoft has some devious master plan like that.