| bunchanumbers said: Even the final release versions will have issues. Both of these consoles are already being pushed beyond their limits. Its a bummer that 1080p and 60 fps is mainly the realm of PC gaming. |
How fitting your username is to this post. It's just a bunch of numbers and you won't be able to tell by playing it.
Isn't it struggling to reach a locked 30fps? I can't see how 60 fps would be possible. Locked 30 fps would probably nicer than an unlocked fps anyway.
Ryse: Son of Rome is 900p on my console and it's still the best looking game I have ever played.
I know it's disappointing, but I wouldn't get too worked up about it.
It's more of a big deal on paper than in real life.
|
Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon! |
|
 |
Tell me a funny joke! |
I just hope the framerate is solid like a rock, they should take all the time they need to polish the game to death (not like they have a bad track record in this regard). I've waited almost 10 years for this game, I can wait more.
| Zappykins said: Ryse: Son of Rome is 900p on my console and it's still the best looking game I have ever played. I know it's disappointing, but I wouldn't get too worked up about it. It's more of a big deal on paper than in real life. |
It is 1080p + on PC and it looks even better.
right click -> view image, and even zoom in about seven times to get the idea of what it'd look like on an HDTV.
Difference in jaggies (would be more pronounced on an HDTV) Look at his arm. The jaggies in the 900p version are more pronounced and obtrusive. Jaggies distract from gameplay in my opinion. Especially in games with a lot of foilage (causes flickering.)
Difference in clarity (would be even more pronounced on an HDTV.) Look at SPQR on the post and look at the warriors next to it. Less of a deal for me personally, but still some people like a sharp, crisp image.
zero129 said:
1st. ok So let me see if i understand you right here. Console gamers can benafit from a boost in res cos its a closed system but PC cant benefit with a boost in res on a game that was never on the system before or never above a res of 720P when it was on consoles cos its an open system??. 2nd. first you say that only 3rd rate JRPG's come to PC then when i point out that the FF series is no 3rd rate series and that the reason SE is porting ther older FF games is 1 that they have no new one out atm since everyone is waiting on FF15!, and 2 they want to build up their userbase and see how the games sell. you go on to point out that SE brought us The Last Remnent last gen wich by your definition (Going by what you said about the other JRPG's on steam such as Valkrye Profile etc) is a 3rd rate JRPG. So last gen SE gave us a 3rd rate JRPG and this gen they are porting their mainline FF games to steam like the is no tomorrow with 6 of them already being released and 4 of them games never even being on PC before, are you seeing a difference here??.. 3rd. "FF 15 is certainly have high expectation for many console gamer, and even if it's come it will take a long time to come" SE has said many times they will like the game to be on PC heres one of them times "During his on-air E3 Square Enix Presents interview, director Tetsuya Nomura commented that the game was being developed in a PC environment, and that platforms that best support DirectX 11 will be likely candidates for the game’s appearance. While this may rule out a WiiU debut, it has led some PC fans to wonder if Square Enix will throw a bone their way. Yoshihisa Hashimoto, Square Enix’s Chief Technology Officer, has lead the charge into the next-generation for the company with the Luminous Engine that will host games such as Final Fantasy XV. A PC version is currently undecided, but “collaborations” with Luminous Studio are planned for the future. The game, as per the team, will require a top of the line (expensive) machine to run. It’s because of this point that they want to see what the “demand” will be from the PC audience (which is your cue to let them know that you want it)." LINK: http://www.finalfantasy.net/xv/world-epic/ . Now as you see from that one link SE has no problem with bringing the game to PC but they want to see what the Demand is like first, how would they do that? by releasing other Final Fantasy games something they have been doing already! like i said! and they have been selling very well!!, but lets ignor all that.. 4th. My theory isnt working cos MGS 3-4 didnt come to PC?? did you even read what i was writing?? (BTW MGS2 is on PC), cos i used that to prove my point!! something you just backed up! since it shows that more Japan devs are seeing value in relasing on PC too. And BTW they released MGS: GS on PC to test how a MGS game would sell after it sold so well we are now gettin MGS5PP that proves my point since the last time we had a MGS game on PC was MGS2!!, but no where did i say that Konami will release MGS 3-4 on PC before MGS5 (But i do believe MGS 3 and 4 will come to PC at some point but it wont be before MGS5). 5th. No my friend you are dead wrong, What i meant before was that Valve has made PC gaming more User Friendly for the casuals that game on consoles sorry if i wanted to put it in friendlier terms before but i still dont mean this in a bad way, But alot of console gamers always needed PC to become more friendly for them to get into Something Valve has done and in doing so has made the experence more easy for them (Console like since they dont have to worry about manualy updating their games etc etc). But its consoles thats becoming more and more like PC and trying to image Valves online service but still cant top it as Valve does have the Best Online Store and the Best Online Service and its all free amazing i know!!. 6th. Yes they where very different at one point but Consoles and PC's are now more alike then ever with many of the same experences on both and more and more console only gamers now getting PC's to game on also!. I bet if your any type of a social person at all with gaming friends you know at least a few of them that has heard of Steam and plans on getting a PC to game on or a laptop etc.. Anyway i am the one done with you here as it seems all the points i have made have gone completly over your head and now your pulling the "Derailing the thread" well guess what if you dont want my opinion dont reply to me in the thread i have a wall or PM for that you know!! something you should already know since you said it ya self!. |
Some things sound ok, other dont. Ps4 is unlikely using directx11, most likely uses some kind of opengl variant that can do the same stuff. As for wii u, wii u also supports opengl with directx11 equivalent features that havce already been confirmed like compute shaders, multi threaded rendering, etc.
here is an example that better explains this
if this is directx11
then how do you call this?, directx 10?
please understand
outlawauron said:
How fitting your username is to this post. It's just a bunch of numbers and you won't be able to tell by playing it. |
I don't see the issue. All I've heard from Sony fans is 'Better on PlayStation' and Sony themselves said that 1080p makes you a better gamer. Supercharged PC and almost every buzzword in gaming. Even the director of this game says, “As a developer I did not actually feel that much of a pull from the PS3 to want to develop games for it, but I certainly feel that from the PS4. It feels like a very big evolution in game design, similar to the shift from 2D to 3D was. I really feel that this challenge to create something that could not be done on any platform other than PS4 can only happen with the latest cutting edge consoles of the current generation.”
Is it wrong that I want to hold them to the standards they set?
| sc94597 said: It is 1080p + on PC and it looks even better. right click -> view image, and even zoom in about seven times to get the idea of what it'd look like on an HDTV. Difference in jaggies (would be more pronounced on an HDTV) Look at his arm. The jaggies in the 900p version are more pronounced and obtrusive. Jaggies distract from gameplay in my opinion. Especially in games with a lot of foilage (causes flickering.) Difference in clarity (would be even more pronounced on an HDTV.) Look at SPQR on the post and look at the warriors next to it. Less of a deal for me personally, but still some people like a sharp, crisp image.
|
Oh, no doubt, higher rez looks better. But remember these are zoomed in images, it's not how it looks on the screen.
If you look back, I wanted 4K to be the standard. But, obously, I don't think $2,000+ priced consoles are going to work. I also wanted 120 FPS, but I'm freaky that way.
A good upscaler can do well though. Never as good a true res, but not a biggy. My buddy was playing Shadow of Mordor on his 2K high speed TV and it look better than mine. But I also respond to the high frame rate well, but I know some people hate it. It makes up additional frame to make the picture smoother, which does add a little noise. But it's not like my game looks bad at 1080p30.
I'm just saying when you are playing a game, the difference between 900p and 1080p isn't really worth getting one's panties in a bind. But yes it is dissapointing, but mostly negligible.
|
Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon! |
|
|
Tell me a funny joke! |
I'm very disappointed in FFXV from a technical standpoint. Compared to FFXIII, it's less than groundbreaking when it isn't pushing any boundaries. Some of the textures look like a mess, less than impressive shaders, the lighting and the models are meh ...
Now this ...
I know this is a demo but this is getting pitiful considering a franchise of this pedigree ...
I'd rather have a game with an explorable world (exploration has always been something important in the FF series), even if it doesn't look perfect graphically (edit: and not like the demo looks bad), than some pretty but shallow corridor game like FFXIII.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
.
lol because it's close system, unlike PC games that benefit on advance graphic option, having resolution and frame rate bump only does waste the PC that utilize high end graphic card, you can play the games on very old card and it still look the same (despite the resolution).
