do you want to see link butt fuck zelda? because thats how you make link butt fuck zelda.
Or any other company? Discus below! | |||
Yes | 137 | 18.36% | |
no | 566 | 75.87% | |
other company post below | 9 | 1.21% | |
Le'Sei resuultse! | 33 | 4.42% | |
Total: | 745 |
do you want to see link butt fuck zelda? because thats how you make link butt fuck zelda.
bananaking21 said: do you want to see link butt fuck zelda? because thats how you make link butt fuck zelda. |
I think we have Rule 34 for that!
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
LOL I doubt it, but it would be hilarious. Just imagine Link as Max from MP3. LMAO
lol, Zelda isn't built off merely being a fun sandbox game. Probably the quality of puzzles, unique whimsical flair and sense of adventure would be missing from a rockstar developed game.
Yeah, my worst fear is that the next Zelda wont have enough DLC...
...someone hold me
No, I don't think they could make a better Zelda than Nintendo.
I love Rockstar, I buy all their games, but if they were to make a Zelda it would probably be a buggy mess.
Especially if they were limited to using Ninendo's hardware. I think they would get half way through, quit and say the hardware was too weak.
If they were both making a Zelda on more powerful hardware, Nintendo would still win.
FUCK no.
Sorry, Rockstar's games are primarily impressive in the amount of geography they pack into them. As far as actual gameplay mechanics/combat go, they're mediocre at best, and they're at the low end of mediocre at that.
Rockstar does content and satire really well but I don't think they could pull off the charm of a fantasy game.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.