Nobody ever tried to make games for Playstation/Xbox consoles?

So if I make a new game company - let's say 'Awesome' - and release a game on PS4, it is automatically innovative, because nobody ever published awesome games on PS4 before?

Was PS Move innovative then? What about hdmi in the PS3? Or 1080p games on the PS4? By that logic, just about anything that is newly done is innovative. Most people don't use the word in that way. Innovation usually applies to industry standards. Nintendo becoming a third party publisher when there are already a plethora of them is not innovative. 

Only PROFITS matter so they should stick to amiibo and portable and dump console because only PROFITS matter

There is no reason to believe the Wii U won't make a net profit, and even then there is no reason to believe that its successor won't. Then the question is, "does the profit exceed the opportunity cost?" and if Nintendo already planned to make amiibos and a handheld regardless, it is safe to assume, yes. 

If you dont like digital games (I dont like them)

and

if your console actually has a good bluray drive (unlike PS3 which had bad read speed) you dont need to install the games at all to play them.

So I dont care if I have to completely download a game to play it (since I dont play digital console games) and the Wiiu bluray drive is fast enough. (could be more silent tho)


Confortable would be to play retail physical games without disk and then once 2 weeks or so pass you have to reinsert it to confirm you actually own it.  (digital kinda solves this yes but I dont own digital games like I own physical ones. Shutdown the service and I cant play them. I cant borrow games or lend them to friends and I cant resell them. And I cannot have a collection I can look at or show to friends etc)

The biggest innovation Nintendo could possibly do would be to open a school and teach other developers how to make completed games that work that dont drop to unplayable sub 20 FPS and remind devs that the most important thing to focus in game development is gameplay NOT visuals.

It has got EA games though. If you put all Indies in one category, you have to put also all AAA-publishers in one. So Nintendo releasing games on PS4 would not be innovative, as EA already did that.

^It would be amazing.  I'm not gonna buy a sub-par console to play 2 great Nintendo games a year.   

However I would LOVE to buy two great Nintendo games on an EXCELLENT console EVERY year.

Not at all true.  The only reason last-gen consoles could get away with a the paultry 12 MB/s drives is that they were too weak to need any faster streaming.  However modern HDD's stream at 50-150 MB/s and have WAY less latency.  This is the standard going forward for any modern looking game with big textures.

And most are closet Nintendo fans by the sounds of it.