"consider looking into it in the future."

Nintendo is still more conservative than the fucking church.

To you specifically and to many people in here calling this BS:  

The competition have NOT been region-free for that long at all.  The PS2 was region-locked as well.  And also the new consoles have a form of region-locking where the region-lock is on the disc rather than on the system.  The excuse isn't BS, and I would say the main reason Nintendo doesn't do the same is because of what happened with the DS and people screwing around with flash carts and bypassing certain things.

Iwata, sometimes I hate you you bastard.

RealGamingExpert said: Could Drake Tolu translate this please?

Hifuckinglarious!

Again, what is his reasoning then? Just random acts of stupidity and/or evil? Clearly they took a risk with the DS, thought they could do even better financially with region locking the 3DS, and now they see the difference and are considering going back. This is an investor Q&A, after all. It's all about the financial motivations. Saying that he's lying about region locking for financial reasons in an investor meeting is pointless. It's not crap, you just don't like region locking. But then you don't like Nintendo either, so it's not like you really care, you just want an excuse to call Nintendo evil/stupid. It doesn't matter why they didn't care with the DS, what matters is that they decided they did care, and between it being financially motivated to benefit the seller, the obvious reason for all region locking (unless you think it benefits the buyer?), and being a random act with no reasoning behind it, I'm inclined to believe it's financially motivated to benefit the seller, because that makes more sense than acting randomly. It's a basic principle of economics, that people and corporations do what they think is in their best interest at the time. So saying that because they made one decision at one time and a different decision later means the later decision is crap is illogical. The simpler, more logical conclusion is that they changed their minds about that policy based on new reasoning about what would be in their best interest. Now they gave their reasons for it, and I really don't know what more you want from them. I wish it wasn't region locked either, but that doesn't mean I'm going to claim they're lying about their reasons for region locking when they fully admit the financial motivations behind the decision.

Blah Blah Blah, we need money cause our wiiu and 3ds are selling lower than expected so buy two of them if you want stuff from other regions, please understand! Least next time, they might not implement it

I love reading things translated from Google Translate :)

From where do you base your claim that I don't like Nintendo? Do you think I have anything against them? Based on what?

Of course they took a risk with the 3DS making it region-locked, and yes it was a stupid decision. Both the DS and the GBA were region free. So was the PSP (except for the PSP's UMDs, but the games were region free.) and then they got a bad idea about region-locking possibly making them money.

The first four and a half lines of the answer are pure bullshit. The only thing that isn't is that it's for the sellers sake and not the customer. And ofcourse you choose to look at the only thing that isn't crap instead of the statement as a whole, which is crap.

Like most people who say something is a stupid decision, it's stupid because you don't like it.  I know that's your reasoning because you don't even explain why it's stupid beyond "X and Y is region free" and "I don't like the reasons they gave."  

Pretty much every system has a form of region lock on it, whether they leave it up to the publisher, put it on the hardware, or put it on the software.  The motivation for keeping more strict forms of region lock have a lot to do with how people work around it and how some people abuse the system.  Region lock sounds like a dumb idea until you find out that there are actual legal reasons why it's put into place.  Nintendo doesn't WANT to region lock systems for the sake of region locking them.  Like every other company, Nintendo is interested in making profits.  Given what happened with the DS with flashcarts, I imagine that has a good bit to do with their reversion to their strict region lock.  

How the f*** can you know my reasoning? It's not just that I don't like the decision. I'm saying it was a stupid decision based on what we know now. I might not have said that 4 years ago, but based on what we know now it was not smart.

Their reasons for why (besides the general "it's for the sellers"):

1) localization takes a long time. 

Exactly, which is why you shouldn't force people to wait potentially several years to play a game if their okay with playing it in Japanese (or whatever). This might even cost sales, because in the period beetween release and localization all hype might be dead.

2) Marketing deals.

Marketing deals existed during DS era as well, and it both MS and Sony can have regionspecific marketing deals, yet somehow they can have region-free consoles. That proves that it's not a legal problem.

3) "All kinds of circumstances"

Those circumstances are also present with their competetion, and were also present during the DS/PSP era. Again, if their competetion can bypass those circumstances, why can't Nintendo?

You know my reasoning? Please, don't be such an arrogant a****** and think that you know what others think.