CGI-Quality said:
Not always - at least from most rational people. Problem with a lot of previews these days - they don't go in-depth about either what's right or wrong (unlike the magazine days of the 80s and 90s, where journalists would really cover the bases). That's my biggest complaint, as a gamer from those times. Today, it's all about hits (give a game 10/10 - don't elaborate on its merits, while giving acclaimed titles 3/10 without going much into what went wrong or simply "not liking it"). So I get the complaints and fears of shoddy journalism. This particular read, he doesn't really go in-depth and even says he wants the game to play like other games. This is partially why devs don't take many risks anymore. That's not good. |
I too miss the days of magazine reviews, where site traffic didn't affect profit margins. Just confuses and messes up the whole system, which is F****d beyond all belief to me. Thats why I like to see negative previews, as they buck the predictable norm these days.












