By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Are the PS4 versions of multiplats really better??

Oh trust me, sub 1080p on a 1080p screen and crushed blacks is something you easily spot...



Around the Network
4k1x3r said:
Oh trust me, sub 1080p on a 1080p screen and crushed blacks is something you easily spot...


Not when its upscaled T_T

So if someone asked you which console has the better versions of multiplatform games, you would tell them they're identical?



 

The PS5 Exists. 


Neodegenerate said:
kitler53 said:
Neodegenerate said:
random15 said:
And even if they cared they will see 1080p vs 900p and say yes it is better.

I always found the resolution thing to be funny.  Show me someone who can stand at an optimal viewing distance from a TV and tell me how many lines are on that screen with consistent accuracy, and I might actually take the resolutions arguments seriously.


how many pixels does your TV have and why did you waste your money on a 1080p tv when you can't see the difference?


I can tell when something is 480, 720, or 1080.  my response didn't say anything about not being able to see the difference in the standard settings for television.  My response said show me someone who can say, by looking at a game on the screen, "oh that one is 900p" and then "that one is 784p", or "that one is 1080p".

way to contradict yourself.

my tv is 1080 but i can always tell the difference between content on the tv being at standard def, 720p, or 1080p.  it is obvious and a massive change.  but then again,. i sit 6 feet from a 46 inch tv so according to the charts 4k is justifyable to my viewing configuration...



Neodegenerate said:
Mr.Playstation said:
No one in the right mind will buy a game which is inferior to the same game on a different console no matter how small the difference. Anyways with these consoles there is no difference except power ( and exclusives ) unlike previous gens where even though multiplats looked worse on the ps3 it still had free online play and Bluray.


I would buy the "inferior" (900p instead of 1080p example) version of the game if it were on the console where all of my friends bought it.  Not everyone has every console, and not everything is about framerate or resolution.  Those two items generally being the disparities this gen.


Why? If you wanna play with your friends play co-op games with them on the same couch, that's a much better and enjoyable way, secondly if one can't buy both consoles then buy one with the best multiplats and exclusives, and finally I do agree that framerate and resolution are not everything that's why I would always choose a ps3 over Xbox 360 even though the xbox 360 had the much better multiplats.



Send a Friend Request On PSN :P

Around the Network

The technological differences are minimal, but PS4 make less mistakes. Xbox not only have a weaker hardware, but had things like paywalls and DRMs. People avoided that and went to PS4, now Xbox is trying to catch up. I choose PS4 because they are better prepared.



3DS, Wii, PSP, Vita, PS2, PS3, PS4 & Steam.

4k1x3r said:
Oh trust me, sub 1080p on a 1080p screen and crushed blacks is something you easily spot...


Well on my 50 inch Panasonic Viera I have never seen enough of a difference in multi-plat games for me to think "damn, this thing is ugly by comparison" when playing on PS3 or the 360 last gen.  Guess when I get the X1 eventually I can see if the "inferiority" is immediately noticed.



Danman27 said:
Yes. Next question.

Literally, exactly what I was going to post.

Its simple reasoning really.

If the games are virtually identical, and the only difference is better resolution or framerate, the gaps of which where much smaller last generation but paradoxically mattered a whole lot more i.e 900p to 1080p is bigger then 720p to 800p but 800p mattered a lot more, and they cost the same price, 60$. Then the better version is obviously the one that has better framerate/resolution.

Why would you willingly pay the same price for a worse version of the game, even if you claim you can't tell the difference. It seems like purposely cheating yourself. The only justification that makes any sense is if you have reasons outside of the game, such as friends on the console to play the game with or already being subscribed to one of the Networks, or you really like the Tablet, lol touch screen hacking..., other than those there is really no valid reason.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

The emperor has no pixels.



kitler53 said:
Neodegenerate said:
kitler53 said:
Neodegenerate said:
random15 said:
And even if they cared they will see 1080p vs 900p and say yes it is better.

I always found the resolution thing to be funny.  Show me someone who can stand at an optimal viewing distance from a TV and tell me how many lines are on that screen with consistent accuracy, and I might actually take the resolutions arguments seriously.


how many pixels does your TV have and why did you waste your money on a 1080p tv when you can't see the difference?


I can tell when something is 480, 720, or 1080.  my response didn't say anything about not being able to see the difference in the standard settings for television.  My response said show me someone who can say, by looking at a game on the screen, "oh that one is 900p" and then "that one is 784p", or "that one is 1080p".

way to contradict yourself.

I fail to see the contradiction.  I stated that I can see the difference in standard def, 720 def, and 1080 def.  I want to see someone who can tell me where things are between those specific definitions.