By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Dark Souls 2 Coming to PS4/Xbox One According to Tesco.com

sales2099 said:
kitler53 said:
sales2099 said:
Great! Xbox 1 gamers now have their own Bloodborne :)


lol.   for the record,..  previews have been saying bloodborne plays very differently.   fast and more focus on offense than defense.

Well thank you for being the first one to say the real difference aside from just looking prettier


oh, and i forgot to add,..  bloodborne has been confirmed to be 60fps and 1080p.  anything less would be unplayable.

 

spoiler: the aforementioned fact may not be true.  i'm not really sure.



Around the Network

The first one had a "goty" edition, so that makes sense.



KLXVER said:
the-pi-guy said:
KLXVER said:

You are absolutely right. Man, these remasters are getting a bit out of hand...

Think of it as a delayed port.  


..........that actually helps. Thank you;)


And it should be accurate, considering this is the version they were promoting before the game was released..

I mean ffs, that version has to exist somewhere..it sure as hell isn't (sadly) the PC version



I don't even know why I bother coming to these threads.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
I don't even know why I bother coming to these threads.


But you came. Also you commented. Welcome.



Around the Network
sales2099 said:
daredevil.shark said:
sales2099 said:
Great! Xbox 1 gamers now have their own Bloodborne :)


Lol. Man. Your comment makes me laugh.

Yes, perish the thought of a multiplat substituting for a exclusive.

Allow me to blow your mind again. I bought Devil May Cry 4 as a substitute for God of War.

(Your brain = Does not compute)?

Lol no you didn't. "Substitute" implies having an option to substitue in. You can't have DMC4 "sub in for" GOW, when you had no GOW to sub in for in the first place. You didn't buy DMC "instead of " GOW, because you couldn't buy GOW for something else to be bough "instead of" it. That's like playing 5 on 5 basketball, and saying you were the "substitute" player because the starter got tired....but you, yourself, are the starter because no other alternates or a bench exists. Imagine if LeBron got tired and subbed out and the sub in was himself. Makes no sense, right? Because, effectively, there was no substitution.

"Substitute" implies more than 1 thing that can interchange positions. You didn't have a PS3. You didn't have the option of choosing one over the other. You were stuck with what you were stuck with. Not "substituting".

OT: I may pick this up if there are improvements. If this is the "definitive" version. I didn't get around to DS2 but if nothing else changes and this is just a port with prettier graphics, I'll pick it up for PS3 or PC



Now this would actually be a remaster that deserves the hate (although id still probably buy it lol)

If this game ships as the PS360 versions were originally advertised then this would be a massive F U to the people who brought the PS360PC versions, when we brought the game we expected it too look like how it was dam advertised, only to get shat on and we have to buy the next gen versions to get the REAL release

That is what we should have gotten^, instead we need to buy the next gen versions for it (witch i most likely will, if true lol)



Sweet, gives me a chance to play this gem. I really enjoyed my time with dark souls 1.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

BMaker11 said:
sales2099 said:
 

Yes, perish the thought of a multiplat substituting for a exclusive.

Allow me to blow your mind again. I bought Devil May Cry 4 as a substitute for God of War.

(Your brain = Does not compute)?

Lol no you didn't. "Substitute" implies having an option to substitue in. You can't have DMC4 "sub in for" GOW, when you had no GOW to sub in for in the first place. You didn't buy DMC "instead of " GOW, because you couldn't buy GOW for something else to be bough "instead of" it. That's like playing 5 on 5 basketball, and saying you were the "substitute" player because the starter got tired....but you, yourself, are the starter because no other alternates or a bench exists. Imagine if LeBron got tired and subbed out and the sub in was himself. Makes no sense, right? Because, effectively, there was no substitution.

"Substitute" implies more than 1 thing that can interchange positions. You didn't have a PS3. You didn't have the option of choosing one over the other. You were stuck with what you were stuck with. Not "substituting".

OT: I may pick this up if there are improvements. If this is the "definitive" version. I didn't get around to DS2 but if nothing else changes and this is just a port with prettier graphics, I'll pick it up for PS3 or PC

Your just arguing my not-precise choice of wording. I bought DMC4 to get my 3rd person beat-em-up fix, thus GOW wasn't a factor to buy a PS3 (not that I would have anyway).

In this case, I didn't buy DS2 so by getting this remake, I wouldn't consider Bloodborne as a reason to buy the PS4 (not that I would have anyway).



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

sales2099 said:

Your just arguing semantics and my not-precise choice of wording. I bought DMC4 to get my 3rd person beat-em-up fix, thus GOW wasn't a factor to buy a PS3 (not that I would have anyway lol).

In this case, I didn't buy DS2 so by getting this remake, I wouldn't consider Bloodborne as a reason to buy the PS4 (not that I would have anyway).

Lol that's not semantics. That's facts. That's the definition.

"I bought DMC4 to get my 3rd person beat-em-up fix" yea...because that was all you could buy. But if it were as simple as that, then no need to buy Halo to get your "1st person sci-fi shooter fix" because you've got Destiny. Oh wait...you are gonna get Halo still, right? It's because you have the ability to buy it (as opposed to GoW). I wouldn't be foolish enough to say "I have Destiny, so no need to play Halo. I got my fix", especially because it makes no sense to miss out on a completely different game, with a different story, different setting, etc. (which I'm going to go out on a limb and say would be your reason for differentiating it from Destiny) just because the gameplay was similar. Otherwise I wouldn't have played, for example, both Legend of Dragoon and FFIX. But hey, different strokes. If having one game trumps your potential enjoyment of multiple other games, because you got your "fix", that's good for you. I, personally, wouldn't not play Battlefield just because I played CoD, but that's just me. You seem to be that way, so I'd only expect you to own 10-12 games over the course of any given generation =/.

I also find it ironic coming from the guy who's trumpeted on here for a long time "Xbox 360 has more AAA, AA, and A games than PS3, so objectively it has the better library" but now, having less games is ok because you can "get a fix" with one game. Are you not gonna be interested in Bloodborne 2 (if that were to happen) as well, because you can get your "fix" with DS2?