They are late in this gen and may be not possible in future too due to mostly its going to be online based consoles due to future so they missed the oppurtunity for the last decade and trusted more on their mario and handheld.

Those numbers mean absolutely nothing to the Wii U's current situation. How much have the Wii U successors to any of those games sold by comparison. Nothing. They've sold like shit by comparison, especially in the west, because those games were inflated by hardware far more desirable than software. That's not the case with Nintendo anymore and the Wii U's sales prove it while Killzone and InFAmous, two of Sony's notably weaker franchises, are outselling literally every big Nintendo game that isn't Mario, especially in the West. Titanfall, a new IP, is curbstomping Zelda. Forza sold better than Pikmin 3 and DKCTF combined. The only reason Wii Party U is relevant right now is because 2/3 of it's sales came from bundle... In Japan.

Your denial pains me.

Nintendo needs western third party. That is their problem. They dont need western first party. Look at what western first party did for Sony in Japan. As far as sales are concerned being alienated by western tastes has caused the Japanese primarily to only look to Nintendo for specific games.

Nintendo needs to open their mind to third party and get back to the business of being competitive instead of being as ignorant as they always were. If they cant work with them they will continue to have these issues.

That's not true at all. The Japanese are moving away from consoles, not from Sony. Even then, Sony makes primerily western games now which is not what I'm suggesting. I'm saying Nintend needs to add western IP.

And no, Nintendo doesn't need 3rd party. 3rd party games will never sell on a Nintendo console until they have exclusive IP that will lure in that same audience. It's the reason why literally every single western 3rd party game has positively flopped on the Wii U. There's no audience. Nintendo needs to force that audience on to their consoles by giving them amazing games of that style they want, that they literally can't and will never get anywhere else but on Nintendo. That's what Sony does with Uncharted, TLoU, God of War, Killzone, InFamous, Little Big Planet, Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, Sly Cooper, Heavenly Sword, and Resistance. That's what Microsoft does with Halo, Gears of War, Fable, Forza, Crackdown, Viva Piniata, Quantum Break, and Perfect Dark along with exclusive deals with games like Bioshock, Sunset Overdrive, Titanfall, Call of Duty, and Mass Effect. Compared to that, Nintendo doesn't compete. In the west.

And my point stands that your point is flat. Nintendo doesn't have "a few years of market drought." They've had two whole decades of steady decline, only to be tempererily spiked by an intelligently orchestrated fad, and now the decline is back on schedule. I'm not critisizing their games. I love their games. I've owned almost every Nintendo console and I've play games from every system. I'm no stranger to their mass appeal, but mass appeal doesn't mean universal appeal and now that overstretched appeal is being outdone by more focused and direct western targeting appeal. They need to get with the program.

The Japanese will still buy consoles if they appeal to them. The Wii U has yet to have anything and Sony keeps looking at the west for profit instead of realizing Japan is there. Microsoft...well..they have no shot. I was alluding to the fact earlier than japan is turning to Nintendo . When I say Nintendo I am primarily focusing on the DS. Why might you ask? The DS has not changed from classic Nintendo sensibilities and harkens back to the days when Nintendo had proper support from all parties.

All Nintendo needs is third party and they could have the west in their hands. Third party is much more important than you think and play a large role in why Microsoft and Sony have success in the first place. Nintendos first party sales on popular consoles put both brands to shame, so first party is NOT the problem. 

Nintendo couldn't get to 40 million with the N64...even with great second party from western developer Rare. GoldenEye, Killer Instinct, Conker, Banjo Kazooie and more did not change a thing. 

Sony still trouned them to death with what kids?

Try to figure out what caused Nintendos sales to drop from SNES levels to N64 levels. Look it up and get back to me.

Sony's sales were inflated by the CD player as just like the Wii was with it's motion controls.

Western IPs weren't Nintendo's problem back then. It was an era where games like Crash and Spyro could still generate mass profit. It's not like that anymore. Times have changed and so has the gaming market. The Japanese want handhelds and the west want western appealing games. Nintendo needs that in the form of exclusives. The 360 fell off once it stopped providing exclusives. Nintendo's Wii U is like that except it didn't already lure 80m in the beginning with exclusives that appealed to the west.

Nintendo doesn't need 3rd party. They need new first party western exclusive IPs.

Your logic brings them to the N64 predicament. If quality exclusive games from the west not proving a damn thing to help them says anything look no further than the N64. 

The problem is third party. Without third party Sony and Microsoft would've lost 60-70% of their fanbase. When Nintendo had proper third party in the 80's and 90's they sold in the high ninties to sixty million consoles. Without third party, they couldnt even reach anywhere near those desired numbers. Look at the sales once the third parties made a mass exodus from Nintendo and Sega to Sony. 

Look at the sales. I don't need to say anything else because the sales speak for themselves. This is exactly why Nintendo pandered back to third party with the Wii U but were too late to fix anything about the Wii U because the hardware wasnt up to par with third party demands. Everyone needs to work with third parties these days since Nintendo cant just dominate companies and have third parties following their lead. Nintendo ran third party with an iron fist until Sony came and they found someone else to work with who wouldnt treat them like crap.

"Western IPs weren't Nintendo's problem back then."

No it doesn't.

Dillon's Rolling Western

Pushmo

Sakura Samurai: Art of the Sword

Ketzal's Corridors

Kid Icarus: Uprising

Steel Diver

Denpa Men

Youkai Watch

Golden Sun 4

Tomadochi Life

Crashmo

Dillon's Rolling Western: The Last Ranger

and many others.

If you include 2nd Party games:

Bayonetta 2

Lego City Undercover

The Wonderful 101

And more.

And then 3rd party exclusives:

ZombiU

Kingdom Hearts 3D

Several Resident Evil games

Bravely Default

Bravely Second

Monster Hunter 3

Monster Hunter 4

Several Final Fantasy games

King of Pirates

Rodea the Sky Soldier

And soo much more.

And Nintendo is making more new IPs that will appeal to western gamers.

I don't see the reason to complain, espeicially with how long the competition also takes to pump out any new IPs that will really stand out for getting sales.

No it doesn't what? What does that mean? Nintendo didnt have to worry about western IP's in the NES/SNES era because even though they couldn't stand Nintendos ignorant guts they couldn't profit without them. They were stuck until another company would help them get away from Nintendo until Nintendo would work with them and straighten up.