BTW, Crimea parlament just made a desicion. 16th of March will be referendum, so people of Crimea wil decide, if they stay in Ukraine on join Russian Federation.

Yes.   Well depending on whether or not you consider the current Apache run areas as nations.  (I don't.)

Of course you also have to consider that most geneologists believe the Kossacks do descend from native Ukrainians at least in part.  

Good one on the snipers...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraine-secretive-neo-nazi-military-organization-involved-in-euromaidan-snyper-shootings/5371611

1) You've given no reasons why the emails aren't legit, just why the people who made them made really stupid mistakes in faking them.

2)  Except during the Orange Revolution, the US and EU were upfront about it through people who trained non-violent protestors.   That's a whole lot different then what's going on here.

3) So you more or less made my point for me on the need for Sevestapool.  You say they can move the base, but that they couldn't move the base now, because it takes time and money.   So if the Kiev government decides to invaldiate the Russians and kick out the Black Fleet... then what?

4)  Yes.  Russia has been terrible to the Ukraine.   That should be a fairly undeniable statement.  Outside which, did you look at the EU offer?  It's the same as the Greece offer... and the previous offer basically.

Some money upfront with further conditions.

So, it doesn't change anything, accept putting out a big number that better explains that money will be there if the Ukrainian government actually reforms it's economy.

I'm guessing you don't know much about the whole WMD's in iraq thing outside the fact that there weren't any there, if you think the Sharu/West is behind everything statements remotely are the same.

There was plenty of evidence pointing to Iraq having WMDs.  Just none of it ended up being true.  The Bush administration more or less got taken in by info they wanted to believe provided by third parties, while ignore other information.

It's a much more fascinating story then simply "Bush made up some stuff".

In the end, this is what will happen: Ukraine won't react with their military because they are far inferior to Russian forces. US and EU won't defend them military because it would be crazy to start a war against Russia only to defend Ukraine (let's be honest, if Russia invaded and ocupied them, nobody would move a single troop because of that). 

US threatened them with economic sanctions. But they are alone in that since EU won't do it. They depend of the Russian natural gas and, in 2006, Russia already just closed the valves and let EU without gas just because they wanted to give a lesso to Ukraine (that gets a percentage of the gas sales profit, since the pipes pass through their territory). So sanctions won't help.

The problem is simply militar. It's similar to the China/North Korea situation. When NK started doing nuclear tests, the US wanted to intervene, basically the entire OTAN wanted it. China didn't want it. Why? Because if that happened, the OTAN would ocuppy the country. And it would become a militar base for the US in China's borderline. For China, it's better to have the crazy anti-US dictator there than an US militar base right in their backyard. They won't go as far as defending NK, but will try to stop any intervention. That is similar to Ukraine's situation. The new government is pro-US. Russia don't want to lose a coutry it influences that is right in their backyard. The recent US$ 1 B loan from US probably only made things worse. Putin know that Ukraine will become a closer ally to US and EU. So the new plan is to separate Crimea, so they will still have a militar base in the middle (Crimea is full of Russians anyway). They will simulate a full scale invasion just to go to the negotiation table in the end and declare Crimea an independent country. Of course, they will want some deal about the gas pipes, in a way they can't get screwed by Ukraine and maybe they will think in some things to make more difficult for Ukraine to get closer to US and EU.   

UN is a pawn for the 5 security concil member. US started to want to end the North Korea problem, China vetoed it. Syria was the same thing but with Russian vetoing. 

That would be the most reasonable method.

LOL, I guess you don't know much about the missing EWMD-thing. There was ONE source, and the reliability of that source was already doubted internally in secret services. Even with public information at the time it was pretty unlikely the Iraq had WMDs. Most sane people were pointing to the missing proofs and even indications towards this theory. At the time was an official UN-inspection already running - instead of waiting for a result the war was started.

The Bush-administration was all aware of it, but ignored it to have a pretty thin reason to go to war. But the claim the Iraq had WMDs was as believable as now Putins claim the unmarked soldiers in crimea are not russian. In europe (except UK) the war against iraq wasn't justified with WMDs, as even our leaders didn't thought that anyone would buy that here.

Which more or less proves my point.

The wisest move for the Ukraine would be to just let national pride take a hit, let Russia have Crimea and it's naval base and work doublespeed towards Europeon Union/NATO integration

It's always the sane decision to let the people decide upon their own future instead of corrupt leaders. And let not lie to ourself: the leaders involved are all corrupt, it doesn't matter which side they are on in this conflict.

Of course. I just fear that Russians won't accept peoples decision if it doesn't come as they expect it.