By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - So George Zimmerman shot a boy who's not old enough to drink, 2 times in the back, and 1 to 6 times in the balls (like Robocop) in self defense?

Kaizar said:


He only followed and did the confrontation and killed the innocent teen because of robberies.

But the black teen never did any robberies in he's life.

A innocent teenager got killed for nothing. He was someone's son, and now he is dead.


But we do know that TM was in possession of stolen goods at his school and expelled. As for being innocent, we know thats not true. Just because he wasn't commiting any robberies at the time doesn't mean he is onnocent. Logical fallacy in your argument. Are rapists innocent because they aren't robbing anyone?



Around the Network
Kaizar said:

And he suspected a young black male, but he never once suspected a white male, nor female of any race.


More logical fallicies. I've never come across an tibetan monk so I must not be suspicious of them eh?



Damn when I see this thread bumped I think maybe karma exists and someone will be reporting Georgie was found dead in a ditch somewhere but alas never the case :(



If the lady is suing the family of the kid she killed then GZ should sue TM's family. It would be hilarious and he has more of a reason to sue.



DD_Bwest said:
Kaizar said:
DD_Bwest said:


and claiming he was after the boy because he thought he robbed a liquor store?   is that also just bait?


The teenager was followed and confronted and killed by a civilian vigilante for robberies, when the teenager never robbed anything in his life.

The teen was followed and confronted and killed for nothing.


Im sorry to be the one to break this to you, but no matter how many times you repeat that to yourself, it wont make it true.

 He was killed because HE started the confrontation, He was the one that came out of the bushes, threw punches at zimmerman and smashed zimmermans head against the ground. THAT is what he got killed for.

actually, the audio recording from Trayvon Martin's cell phone during that night, shows that the black teenager was talking to his girlfriend for several minutes while on the way to his girlfriend's place, and then you hear George Zimmerman in the background at the end of the call, right before Trayvon Martin says to his girlfriend on his cell; hold up, I have someone asking me something. After that, his cellphone was hang-up, so there is no more audio recording from that night from Trayvon's cell phone.



Around the Network

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OvKcXZpDMo

Seems relevant



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

When someone tries to portray a crime because of race, tries to take guns right and talks about the benefits of drugs may I assume left wing and ignore all his points because they won't ever assume to be wrong and use lies to make a false point or is that bias?

There is no way to argue to lefties they will distort, lie, and leave the conversation proud thinking they won.

In Brazil the defendant have the right to lie to protect himself even more since perjury is a lesser crime and in criminal you have the right to full defense. And in USA you can make civil arrest if you have enough evidence of a crime.

And about shooting after being beaten for 3 min not being self defense but after 30s it's, are you serious? And say he done as first resort? Man your points are full of holes.

As you said change the victm to a junkie white kid with previous criminal charges and the killer a upper class black man. Would it make a difference?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:

When someone tries to portray a crime because of race, tries to take guns right and talks about the benefits of drugs may I assume left wing and ignore all his points because they won't ever assume to be wrong and use lies to make a false point or is that bias?

There is no way to argue to lefties they will distort, lie, and leave the conversation proud thinking they won.

In Brazil the defendant have the right to lie to protect himself even more since perjury is a lesser crime and in criminal you have the right to full defense. And in USA you can make civil arrest if you have enough evidence of a crime.

And about shooting after being beaten for 3 min not being self defense but after 30s it's, are you serious? And say he done as first resort? Man your points are full of holes.

As you said change the victm to a junkie white kid with previous criminal charges and the killer a upper class black man. Would it make a difference?

http://m.youtube.com/results?q=bill%20maher%20trayvon%20martin&sm=1

http://m.youtube.com/results?q=jon%20stewart%20daily%20show%20trayvon%20martin&sm=3

http://m.youtube.com/results?q=daily%20show%20trayvon%20martin&sm=3

http://m.youtube.com/results?q=stephen%20colbert%20trayvon%20martin&sm=1



Where r the Dexters in the world when u need to get rid of scum like Zimmerman. Stand your ground should only apply to non lethal shots like the leg or arm or something. If u have a gun you should know how to use it in self defense to disarm not kill.