Plus; what was George Zimmerman motive for following a young black male around, that he had suspected had stolen a few dollars worth of things from a liquor store?

Why would George Zimmerman care soo extremely much about a stolen slim Jim or skittles, or whatever he thought was stolen?

Plus, it turned out the dude didn't even stole anything. So he followed & killed the black teenager for nothing. Where were the weapons of mass destruction? (LOL, at Iraq pond)

George didn't suspect anything was stolen in a liquor store. He didn't know TM was coming from a store. He didn't care about a few dollars. Listen to the call GZ made. He was concerned about the nieghboorhood because there were a rash of break ins recently and TM wasn't recognizable to GZ and TM's skin color had absolutely nothing to do with it. Which is one reason prosecution fell so flat. Because they tried to paint GZ as racially profiling when the only racial comment was made by TM.

I bet you can't make your case without trying to play the race card.

where are you getting your information from? are you just making things up now hoping you are right?

And he suspected a young black male, but he never once suspected a white male, nor female of any race.

Here are the facts about GZ:

He called the cops to report suspicious individual. He described the individual as looking up to no good because it was in a close knit gated community, TM wasn't recognizable to GZ, the community had a rash of break ins and TM was casually walking in poor weather conditions.

When asked to come into the police station GZ went willingly without legal counsel and was eager to talk about it. (A sign of telling the truth because liars try to avoid talking about their lie). When asked to take a lie detector without legal counsel he again wanted to. The lie detector determined he was telling the truth. As for variations in story, again, a sign of telling the truth. The same story usually means its scripted or practiced. Humans recollect different things and different times and that's one reason stories change over time. Even when telling the truth.

Within trial multiple eye witnesses corroborated GZ story. Again, a sign he was telling the truth.

But for some reason, media got wind of this, said GZ racially profiled, edited the police call and made said he made racist remarks (which are lies. GZ was suing the news for slander as he should).

The OP EA's just bait, because there were already a million other threads about George Zimmerman killing TM.

He's not a murderer, because he was found innocent, but he IS a killer because a killed an innocent person who never did any robberies.

and claiming he was after the boy because he thought he robbed a liquor store?   is that also just bait?

He only followed and did the confrontation and killed the innocent teen because of robberies.

But the black teen never did any robberies in he's life.

A innocent teenager got killed for nothing. He was someone's son, and now he is dead.

The teenager was followed and confronted and killed by a civilian vigilante for robberies, when the teenager never robbed anything in his life.

The teen was followed and confronted and killed for nothing.

Im sorry to be the one to break this to you, but no matter how many times you repeat that to yourself, it wont make it true.

 He was killed because HE started the confrontation, He was the one that came out of the bushes, threw punches at zimmerman and smashed zimmermans head against the ground. THAT is what he got killed for.