Forums - Movies Discussion - The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smeags Hype Thread: Are You Hyped?

Tagged games:

Are You Excited?

Yes, very! 62 68.89%
 
Kind of. 10 11.11%
 
Neutral. 8 8.89%
 
Not at all! (What's wrong with you?) 10 11.11%
 
Total:90
Mr Khan said:
Aldro said:
Mr Khan said:
Just "why" on Kili x Tauriel

the rest was pretty good, stood a little closer to canon and fleshed out some good things like Laketown politics or Dol Guldur. Changing the Arkenstone to be an artifact that would allow Thorin to rule was a nice touch, as it actually made more sense than the canonical plot, which was "Find Smaug, Bring Burglar, ???, Profit!" Here they only wanted the Arkenstone, and with it could rally the Dwarves to fight off Smaug.

Because sausage parties are no fun.

 

Seriously though did you SEE Tauriel?

No, i get why Tauriel needed to exist, but why the romantic tension with Kili? It runs entirely counter to every portrayal of Dwarves and how they interact with Elves.

Because they saw an oppertunity to probably tell a bit about Legolasand it makes ..the next movie rather interesting. (If you've read the book), SPOILERS: Kili dies and with him having a romance, people will be able to atleast seperate him from any other dwarf (even if the book barely seems to mention him). Basically itll be more impactful. Maybe Tauriel dies alongside him as well. And I dont know about you but I'll weep if that hotness dies ;_;



Around the Network

Please copy & paste your reviews on this Thread:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=154457

 

And post what you think of 2014 3D movie trailers you saw here:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=173039

 

Thank you.



Went to see it last night... 3D high frame-rate so it looked extremely sleek.

Needless to say, it... was... AWESOME.

It's better than the first Hobbit for sure, but sadly it also is the most open-ended of all the LotR/Hobbit movies! D*mnit why do I need to wait another year :-|.



S.Peelman said:
Went to see it last night... 3D high frame-rate so it looked extremely sleek.

Needless to say, it... was... AWESOME.

It's better than the first Hobbit for sure, but sadly it also is the most open-ended of all the LotR/Hobbit movies! D*mnit why do I need to wait another year :-|.


Can you please post what you thought about the movie on the very first Hobbit Desolation ofSmeags Thread?:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=154457



The only Original and very first Hobbit Desolation of Smeags Thread:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=154457


@OP

Stop stealing my reviews, LOL.



Around the Network

I hate Smaug, he was like "freaking see me again next year b!tches" with that ending. :/



I loved the way the depicted Smaug. I was very hyped going into this movies, reviews said it was better than the first one. I loved the first movie so I was hyped. Kind of a let down.

I liked the movie alot, but it felt like only half a movie in my opinion, where as the first movie felt like a complete movie. I'm sure I'm going to love the third one.



this movie sucked. for every minute that was interesting there were 6 minutes where i was so bored i wished i had something sharp to poke myself with just so i could stay entertained.



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

MrBubbles said:
this movie sucked. for every minute that was interesting there were 6 minutes where i was so bored i wished i had something sharp to poke myself with just so i could stay entertained.

I was playing with myself due to Tauriel :)



NintendoPie said:
Dulfite said:

You know, I didn't understand that whole 48fps issue that people had before the first Hobbit movie came out. Now I know better. I had more of a headache (mostly in my eyes) from watching that movie and strying to keep up with everything going to fast on the screen than I do when I watch 3d movies. My eyes shouldn't hurt when I watch a movie so I will wait until this movie comes out on dvd until I give it a try (and if it hurts my eyes then I'll be done with this trilogy based on 1 book).

I can't really comment on the 48 FPS situation since I saw AUJ on Blu-Ray, but was it really that bad? Did you see it in IMAX/IMAX 3D or did you just see it in 3D?


Not in 3d at all. I've seen movies in 3d and they didn't really hurt my eyes. I watched Hobbit in 48 fps with no 3d and it hurt my eyes. Weird?