Black Ops 3 will be better (assuming it is coming to Wii-U; and I'd think it will be) since it'll be Treyarch handling their own code rather than dealing with someone else's.

That said, I'm not too surprised Wii-U got a bad deal. I understand we're in a cyclical "but we won't buy the games if they're bad ports!" kind of thing right now; but not enough people bought Black Ops 2 in the first place (which is a decent port) to warrant a vast amount of resources going into Ghosts to optimize it.

(I know, I know "we didn't get the DLC" etc., which is all true, but still).

I wonder how it'll sell.

DF said they would do a comparsion of the wiiu version when they do the nextgen versions, i'm gonna wait for the DF faceoff, because impressions from wiiu gamers have been very off with multiplatform comparisons.

But it's Treyarch developing the Wii U version pretty much internally this time as well, even their own formula for resolution and AA is here and exactly the same as in BO2. 

I honestly wouldn't expect the hypothetical BO3 version for Wii U to be much better, it just seems that they have very limited team and resources for that and that's close to what Wii U owners can generally get. They certainly didn't make much progress since BO2, I could find that face off, but iirc that was a pretty staight 360 port visually with big framerate dips, now with Ghosts from what DF is saying it's slightly visually inferior to 360 and terrible framerate is still in place.

I was going to get the Wii U version but, since they apparently didn't try, I'm going to skip the game entirely. First time since Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare on the 360 that I do this. Oh well.

good example why most people outside of gaming forums don't really care too much about resolution. the ps3 version has a resolution of 860x600 and the game will still sell better as any 720p or even better game on ps3. if 720p would be really a problem, 860x600 would be a huge flop but no, people will love it and won't even talk about this resolution.

I think the reality is the wiiu hardware is really close to currentgen, and to make it better then currentgen it needs a lot of effort and optimization, this isn't a rare occurance most ports have been inferior according to digitail foundry, but in the end, i just want to play amazing nintendo games in HD that's why i'm happy with my wiiu.

You put your effort were you will be rewarded, hence why the wii U version is the worst of the 3 and the X360 is the best

When the "next gen" ultimate pc version looks slightly superior to last gen, you know you can't expect much on consoles.

Man. Game looks like total garbage on consoles graphically doesn't it. Total cash-in this game. It's not exactly a contender for 'Graphics King' on PC either, but at least it's presentable. Those console ports are a joke, and the WiiU version is the worst. How on Earth can it be so utterly inconsistent quality-wise? In some scenes, the WiiU version is the clear winner over the other consoles, but then in others, textures look like they're 6th gen!

well Treyarch used IW code to work with. My guess is its just a cheap port to get the game on the console. You can't really blame activision after the poor sales.

There is no excuse for the really poor sales of ghosts. sure it has some issues, but the game also has issues on XBOX one and PS4 and people will preordering it in hundreds of thousands lol.