By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Call Of Duty: Ghosts confirmed for WiiU?

 

Do you think WiiU will get Call of Duty Ghost?

Yea, CoD comes on almost every console 121 72.89%
 
maybe 22 13.25%
 
I dont know.. 23 13.86%
 
Total:166
AAA300 said:

I thought nintendo magazine was cancelled months ago so this whole story is a lie!

That was Nintendo Power. ;)



Around the Network
Mythmaker1 said:
sethnintendo said:

Good because I don't really want to have arguments or deep discussions on this site.  It is either I am right or you are wrong.  Call me immature because I don't give a fuck.  I gave up because your views won't change and mine won't change either.  Perhaps you are the better man but I really don't give a shit.  I don't let others influence me and one more time... Fuck dual analog.  Keyboard + mouse or wiimote + nunchuck shits all over dual analog.  If there is one thing to get from me is that I don't bend my ass over.  You have your own thoughts for how games progressed and I have my own.  Leave it at that.

I was perfectly willing to let you go on your way. You're the one who decided to come back and justify yourself after the fact. Trust me, I would have understood if you hadn't replied back. In fact, if I understand you correctly, you're pretty much agreeing with my last post.

If you are wanting to be intransigent, I have no problem with that. Seriously, there are things I'm not open to discussing myself. But if that's the case, please don't respond to me in a manner that indicates you want a productive discussion. That's all I ask.

I didn't not compose my self and a decent manner last night.  The it is either my way crap wasn't really the truth.  I am open to changing my view points.  Sure I perhaps overstated the stagnation of FPS throughout the past 15-20 years.  I have a perfect explanation for my behavior last night.  I was drunk posting and "discussing" a topic about a genre that I don't really like anymore.  Add alcohol and something I don't like and I will start talking shit even and downplay it more than I actually think of the topic.  

FPS aren't as stagnant as you pointed out with games such as Portal and a few others recent IPs that have added mix to the genre.  I'm just tired of FPS.  I'm tired of the people talking shit that have mics on FPS.  Tired of being accused of cheating when I didn't cheat.  Tired of the ups and downs while playing the game online (turns me into a bipolar person because I expect to win every game and if losing it pisses me off).  Tired of mainly one franchise: CoD.  I'm surprised people still by it more and more each year with little variation they put into their games due to yearly releases.  Eventually Activision will turn it into a Guitar Hero or Tony Hawk where they pump out too many titles and eventually people move on.  That is about the only thing I hope for.  I see Activision as a cancer on gaming (just like I see EA).  Anyways, I am not against debate or discussing things civil.  It was my fault of posting while drunk on a topic that I don't like that much anymore.



sethnintendo said:

I didn't not compose my self and a decent manner last night.  The it is either my way crap wasn't really the truth.  I am open to changing my view points.  Sure I perhaps overstated the stagnation of FPS throughout the past 15-20 years.  I have a perfect explanation for my behavior last night.  I was drunk posting and "discussing" a topic about a genre that I don't really like anymore.  Add alcohol and something I don't like and I will start talking shit even and downplay it more than I actually think of the topic.  

FPS aren't as stagnant as you pointed out with games such as Portal and a few others recent IPs that have added mix to the genre.  I'm just tired of FPS.  I'm tired of the people talking shit that have mics on FPS.  Tired of being accused of cheating when I didn't cheat.  Tired of the ups and downs while playing the game online (turns me into a bipolar person because I expect to win every game and if losing it pisses me off).  Tired of mainly one franchise: CoD.  I'm surprised people still by it more and more each year with little variation they put into their games due to yearly releases.  Eventually Activision will turn it into a Guitar Hero or Tony Hawk where they pump out too many titles and eventually people move on.  That is about the only thing I hope for.  I see Activision as a cancer on gaming (just like I see EA).  Anyways, I am not against debate or discussing things civil.  It was my fault of posting while drunk on a topic that I don't like that much anymore.

Ahh, I understand. Time or two I've done much the same thing. Sorry for jumping to conclusions. :P

You are definitely right in saying games like COD have stagnated, especially over the past 5 years or so. Publishers don't seem to want COD getting too comfortable and cornering the market, hence the COD-clones. I have a feeling Activision is aware this isn't self-sustaining, but they're just riding it out. With online, I think it will survive longer than Guitar Hero, but it can't last forever. I, personally, don't care too much for it for the same reasons as you. Online, especially that sort of online, just isn't really my thing, and that's the only appeal to those games.

Still, as you said, there have been some new IPs to mix things up, so I can't write off the whole genre. It's kind of why I figure FPS doesn't really work. Portal and COD are almost nothing alike, but often they still get lumped under the same genre. For me, COD is a Modern Military Shooter, and Portal is a Puzzle Shooter. Modern Military Shooters are terribly stagnant. The Shooter genre as a whole, a bit less so.



I believe in honesty, civility, generosity, practicality, and impartiality.

IsawYoshi said:
oniyide said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

Honestly if they wrote about it in their magazine I think it would come to Wii U, the main reason Blops 2 sold so bad on Wii U is because they released it on there late and everyone already had the game.


yeah no, the game came out what a whole month after the other versions? wow, thats so late. Im sure all those people who were buying it on PS360/PC couldnt wait to buy it for their brand new WIi Us. Please.

For a game so multiplayer heavy, this is the fact. I'm not sure if it came out one month after, but if that's what you said let's go with that. In one month a large percentage of the buyers have already bought the game, and since the userbase is so large, and your friends who plays the game are on PS3 or 360 you would be less inclined to buy the game on Wii U. 

 

Or atleast I would. 

they would be less inclined to buy it on Wii U anyway whether it came out the same as the other versions or not, because people arent going to spend 300+ on a system to play a game they could play on something they already own. ESPECIALLY if all there friends are playing on P360/PC already. Hell just look at the last few COD games on Wii. THe COD audience is NOT on Ninty systems at least not right now.



KungKras said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:

we are talking about a game that released to 0 install base. even if the Wii U released to conicide with the day blops2 dropped it would have made little difference because people werent going to buy a whole new console to play a game for a system they already owned.

Many wouldn't have, but there would be some gamers who wanted a Wii U but also wanted to buy COD right away to keep up with all their COD-playing friends.

no, they would buy the game on the systems their friends have to play COD if they wanted to keep up, that system isnt Wii U

Most would, not all. BO2 sold 11 million week 1, it's just not realistic to say that there's no overlap with the 400,000 who bought a Wii week one.

the overlap is very small. BO2 sold 11 million first week. BO2 hasnt even sold 250000 copies to DATE. if that is not small overlap i dont know what is.

Missing out on such a big opening is significant. The current overlap is small becaue there WAS in fact no overlap, the game was late.

id agree with that, had it not been on WIi U a system that had NO install base. It would not have mattered if it came out the same time as the others, becaue most people would have bought it on those systems anyway. 

You just don't get it.

CoD during opening week would have pushed hardware, because people want the game, and it is the most feature-rich version. Also, the people who bought Wii U for other games (the enthusiasts, who got Wii U day one) would probably have bought it for their new exciting system.

Either way, it would have done better had it not been late. And had it had a head start, it would have done phenomenally well. I am speaking in terms of attach rate, of course.

No COD was not going to push hardware, it doesnt even push hardware for the cheaper systems. It wont do it for a more expensive one, not when there are CHEAPER alternatives. Most COD players dont give a damn if its feature rich or not, they are playing the version that there friends are playing, that wont be the WII U version. Attach rate, maybe. I dont think most care especially Activision care about attach rate. They want to see their game sell and they are not seeing that on the system.



Around the Network

Will no doubt be a watered down version released after all other versions...
followed by a huge amount of comments from activision about how no third party studios sell any games on Nintendo systems.



Current Game Machines: 3DS, Wii U, PC.

Currently Playing: X-Com(PC), Smash Bros(WiiU), Banner Saga(PC), Guild Wars 2(PC), Project X Zone(3DS), Luigis Mansion 2(3DS), DayZ(PC)

curl-6 said:
AAA300 said:

I thought nintendo magazine was cancelled months ago so this whole story is a lie!

That was Nintendo Power. ;)


Which lives on in spirit through Nintendo Force! set up and run by dedicated fans of Nintendo power.



Current Game Machines: 3DS, Wii U, PC.

Currently Playing: X-Com(PC), Smash Bros(WiiU), Banner Saga(PC), Guild Wars 2(PC), Project X Zone(3DS), Luigis Mansion 2(3DS), DayZ(PC)

Why do people keep saying the Wii U version came out a month late?  The Wii U came out in NA six days after Black Ops 2 launched.  Even if you discard that week and only start counting on the next week when it released in Europe, there have been 9.3 million sales across the PS3 and 360 since the Wii U launched.  Add another ~2.5 million if we're counting from the NA launch.

I don't know where people are getting this idea that everybody who wanted BO2 bought it before the Wii U came out.  Hell, in the last two weeks the PS3/360 versions have sold 184k.  The Wii U version has done 186k since launch.  Now I'm not saying the Wii U version was expected to sell anywhere close to the PS3/360 versions, but the idea that the market was tapped out before the Wii U launched is ridiculous.



I can only afford one next gen system ,which i have chosen Wii U. It would be great to get COD ghosts as i am really enjoying BLOPS 2. The COD audience isnt really in force on Nintendo systems, but there are enough people willing to buy it to contribute a small profit for Activision.



oniyide said:
KungKras said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:

we are talking about a game that released to 0 install base. even if the Wii U released to conicide with the day blops2 dropped it would have made little difference because people werent going to buy a whole new console to play a game for a system they already owned.

Many wouldn't have, but there would be some gamers who wanted a Wii U but also wanted to buy COD right away to keep up with all their COD-playing friends.

no, they would buy the game on the systems their friends have to play COD if they wanted to keep up, that system isnt Wii U

Most would, not all. BO2 sold 11 million week 1, it's just not realistic to say that there's no overlap with the 400,000 who bought a Wii week one.

the overlap is very small. BO2 sold 11 million first week. BO2 hasnt even sold 250000 copies to DATE. if that is not small overlap i dont know what is.

Missing out on such a big opening is significant. The current overlap is small becaue there WAS in fact no overlap, the game was late.

id agree with that, had it not been on WIi U a system that had NO install base. It would not have mattered if it came out the same time as the others, becaue most people would have bought it on those systems anyway. 

You just don't get it.

CoD during opening week would have pushed hardware, because people want the game, and it is the most feature-rich version. Also, the people who bought Wii U for other games (the enthusiasts, who got Wii U day one) would probably have bought it for their new exciting system.

Either way, it would have done better had it not been late. And had it had a head start, it would have done phenomenally well. I am speaking in terms of attach rate, of course.

No COD was not going to push hardware, it doesnt even push hardware for the cheaper systems. It wont do it for a more expensive one, not when there are CHEAPER alternatives. Most COD players dont give a damn if its feature rich or not, they are playing the version that there friends are playing, that wont be the WII U version. Attach rate, maybe. I dont think most care especially Activision care about attach rate. They want to see their game sell and they are not seeing that on the system.

You have no idea what you're talking about. CoD is the series that saved the HD twins.



I LOVE ICELAND!