Turkish said:
Wright said: Well, you know. War...war never changes. |
I remember back than you use to always have your fanboy camps, but 2 years later and it's much more rampant? Not only that, but you can get banned for pointing out that someone is using a fallacy of hasteful generalization and false attribution?
So: War has changed
|
Au contraire. This proves war never changes. What we're seeing is nothing but the logical progress after years of war. We're deeply approaching the point of exhaustion, and that's why the participants; that's it, the combatants. The warriors. The warfare guerrillas are enduring their methods of attack. It's not only now enough to make based asumption attacks and making up excuses; but now we resort to the "report" strategy and alternative accounts that further serves to prove a point. Mods, as in, the last bastion of an unbiased, non-participant team in war, can't help but judge who deserves to win and to lose sometimes, and given the circumstances, no loser team embraces their actions; so that's why you see them more critisized than ever, despite don't deserving it.
War never changes. It doesn't matter what weapons you'll use next. What tactics. Who and when. No, war is war; in the war, everyone loses. Everyone suffers. If war were truly to change, it would need to have a purpose. A motive. A team truly defined as a "bad", and the champions of the "good". But that borders the utopia; the idealization for war. And that's not the point. Never was, never will be.
War never has, and never will change. War...is war.